1 / 9

WP10.2 – status

WP10.2 – status. Reported by L. Bottura and C. Senatore Meeting at CERN, February 2 nd , 2014. Overview of cable options. Result of the discussion on tape/cables. Roebel Mechanical properties and response to loading Manufacturing process for long length, compact cable geometry

edena
Download Presentation

WP10.2 – status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP10.2 – status Reported by L. Bottura and C. Senatore Meeting at CERN, February 2nd, 2014

  2. Overview of cable options

  3. Result of the discussion on tape/cables • Roebel • Mechanical properties and response to loading • Manufacturing process for long length, compact cable geometry • Windability (difficult axis direction and matching the transposition to the curvature radius) • Stacks • Transposition, need and effect of lack of transposition • Effect of transverse forces on the twisting region • All • Impregnation and insulation effects on tapes (delamination, stress distribution) • Protection and need of copper • Striation (how much do we need ?) • Dummies for winding tests • Parallel/transverse field effects and interaction with magnet design

  4. BSCCO Rutherford • Strand parameters • Strand diameter: 0.8 (mm) • Engineering current density (15 T, 4.2 K): 675 (A/mm2) • BSCCO current density (15 T, 4.2 K): 1930 (A/mm2) • Critical current (15 T, 4.2 K): 340 (A) • Cable proposal: • Number of strands: 22 • Cable width: 9.5 (mm) • Cable average thickness: 1.45 (mm) • Keystone angle: 0.6 (degrees) • Thin edge: 1.391 (mm) • Thick edge: 1.517 (mm) • Transposition pitch: 65 (mm) • Cable critical current: 6700 (A)

  5. REBCO Roebel – tape • Target Tape parameters • Tape width: 12 (mm) • Tape thickness: 0.1 … 0.15 (mm) • Engineering current density (15 T, 4.2 K): 450 (A/mm2) • Critical current (15 T, 4.2 K): ≈ 800 A • SC layer: 1…2 mm (TBD) • Cu layer: 30…50 mm (TBD) • Homogeneity and defects TBD to assess the effect of punching • Bonding strength (delamination issue)

  6. Cut tape geometry • Optimal geometry defined by KIT Status at KIT: t= 5.5 mm g= 1 mm α = 30 ° p=126, 226, 426 mm a g t R = 1-2 mm to reduce stresses , seeC. Barth, et al. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25 (2012) 025007 p By courtesy of A. Karlo, ITEP KIT

  7. REBCO Roebel – wide (block coil) • Number of tapes (-) 15 • Cable width (mm) 12 • Cable thickness (mm) 1.2 • Transposition pitch (mm) 226 • Critical current (Bperp) (kA) 5

  8. REBCO Roebel – KIT “stock” • Transposition 226 mm • 15 tapes (only SC) • cable thickness: 1.1 mm • critical current with 10% degradation: 5030 A • Transposition 426 mm • 28 tapes (only sc) • cable thickness: 2.1 mm • critical current with 10% degradation: 9390 A • 27 superconducting tapes and 27*0.15 mm Cu • cable thickness: 4.2 mm • critical current with 10% degradation: 9054 A • 14 superconducting tapes (loose cable) • critical current with 10% degradation: 5350 A By courtesy of A. Kario, ITEP KIT

  9. REBCO Roebel – narrow (cos-q coil) • Number of tapes (-) 8 15 • Cable width (mm) 10 10 • Cable thickness (mm) 0.44 0.88 • Transposition pitch (mm) 126 226 • Critical current (perp) (kA) 1.7 3

More Related