350 likes | 454 Views
Creating an RTI Culture at the Building Level in Order to Make Sound Eligibility Decisions. Oak Hills Local School District Cincinnati, Ohio UC Summer Institute June 14 &15, 2010. Keri Bennett, Ed.S . School Psychologist at C.O. Harrison Elementary
E N D
Creating an RTI Culture at the Building Level in Order to Make Sound Eligibility Decisions Oak Hills Local School District Cincinnati, Ohio UC Summer Institute June 14 &15, 2010 Keri Bennett, Ed.S. School Psychologist at C.O. Harrison Elementary Chelsey Schneider, Ed.S. School Psychologist at Bridgetown MS Brooks Klosterman, M.Ed Regular Education Teacher at Bridgetown MS Jessica Fuhrman, Ed.S. School Psychologist at Oak Hills High School Amy McNabb, Ed.S. School Psychologist at Oak Hills High School
Objectives • Demonstrate the shift from traditional intervention services to full RTI implementation • Provide examples of the application of RTI at the building level • Discuss how the implementation of RTI is building a culture for making sound eligibility decisions
Rti past, present, and future at C.O. Harrison ElementaryKeri Bennett, ED.Sbennett_k@oakhills.hccanet.org
COH demographics • Approximately 1000 students • 94.9% White, Non Hispanic • 9.8% Economically Disadvantaged • 11.0% Students identified with Disabilities • 1 Principal, 1 Assistant Principal • 2 school psychologists • COH rated “Excellent” for the past 7 years
Past….2007-2008 • Universal Screening • DIBELS • All students 3x per year • Administered by classroom teachers • No fidelity checks
Past….2007-2008 • Tier 2 Intervention • PALS, Corrective Reading, Sight Word and Repeated Reading groups • Standard protocol approach • Progress monitored bi-weekly • Delivered by intervention aides • Tier 3 Intervention • Ongoing problem solving for students not making adequate progress • Delivered by Intervention Specialist
Past…2008-2009 • Universal Screening • AIMSweb Reading • All students 3x per year • Administered by District Team • Fidelity checks prior to each administration
Past…2008-2009 • Tier 2 Intervention • PALS (Kindergarten-First) • Repeated Reading and Sight Word groups (Grade 2) • Corrective Reading (Grades 3-5) • Standard protocol approach • 30 minutes daily per grade level • Progress monitored weekly • Delivered by intervention aides • Tier 3 Intervention • Ongoing problem solving for students not making adequate progress • Delivered by Intervention Specialist
Present…2009-2010 • Universal Screening • K-5 Reading measures 3x per year • K-3 numeracy measures 3x per year • Inter-rater reliability checks prior to each administration
Present…2009-2010 • Tier 2 Intervention • PALS, Repeated Readings, Sight Word groups, and Corrective Reading continue • 6 Minute Solution added to Grade 3 • Weekly Progress Monitoring • Fidelity checks • Grade level team meetings once per month • Problem solving meetings for students not making adequate progress • Outcome Data • See handout
Present…2009-2010 • Tier 3 Interventions • Ongoing problem solving for students not making adequate progress • Delivered by Intervention Specialist
Future…2010-2011…and beyond • Universal Screening • Continue AIMSweb for literacy and numeracy • Tier 1 Instruction • Adopt Reading Street as core curriculum
Future…2010-2011…and beyond • Tier 2 Intervention • My Sidewalks-literacy • Number Worlds-numeracy • Tier 3 Intervention • Ongoing problem solving for students not making adequate progress • Delivered by Intervention Aide and/or Intervention Specialist • Increase use of research based programs
Rti past, present, and future at Bridgetown middle schoolChelsey Schneider, ED.SSchneider_C@oakhills.hccanet.orgBrooks Klosterman, ME.dklosterman_B@oakhills.hccanet.org
BMS demographics • 622 students • 6th – 8th • 94.2% White, Non Hispanic • 11.7% Students with Disabilities • 1 Principal • 1 Assistant principal • 2 school psychologists • 38 Certified Teachers
Core beliefs A. Student Learning B. Embraced Theory of Change C. Core leadership Team D. Knowledge Building E. Sustain success
Past….2007-2008 • Tier 2 Intervention • Students selected OAA, and teacher recommendation • Teacher created strategies focusing OAA
Past….2008-2009 • Universal Screening • Aimsweb • 3x per year • Administered by District Team
Past….2008-2009 • Tier 2 Intervention • Students selected based on CBMs, OAA, and teacher recommendation • 3 groups per grade level • Teacher created strategies focusing on fluency, decoding & OAA
Present…2009-2010 • Building Level • RTI academic team created • Year 1 of School-wide PBS • Outcome Data (see handout) • Universal Screening • All students assessed 3x per year • R-CBM and Maze • District screening team
Present…2009-2010 • Tier 2 Intervention • Corrective Reading • Students selected based on CBM, OAA, and teacher recommendation • Tier 2 Outcome Data • See handout
Present…2009-2010 • Tier 3 Intervention • 2-4 times per week • Small group and individual • Repeated reading with error correction
Future…2010-2011…and beyond • Academic • Study skills & organization • Increase Tier 1 support • Balance focus of OAA and basic skills • Math Intervention • Behavior • Strengthen Tier 1 PBS support • Behavior screenings • Social Emotional Curriculum • Tier 2 behavior interventions • Mentoring Program • Check & Connect
Rti past, present, and future at oak hills high schooljessicafuhrman, ed.sfuhrman_j@oakhills.hccanet.orgamymcnabb, ed.smcnabb_a@oakhills.hccanet.org
Ohhs demographics • Approximately 2800 students • 95.1% White, Non Hispanic • 13.8% Students identified with Disabilities • 5 Principals • 5 Counselors • 2 school psychologists • High School rated “Excellent” for 2008-2009 school year
Past….2007-2008 • Tier 2 Intervention • Algebra 1 Rescue! • Reading Rewards • Progress monitored bi-weekly by AIMSweb maze • No selection process
Past…2008-2009 • Universal Screening • 9th and 10th grade • 3X per year • AIMSweb R-CBM and Maze • Tier 2 Intervention • Reading Rewards (grade 9) • Progress monitored bi-weekly using maze • Buckle Down OGT Prep (grade 10) • No selection process
Present…2009-2010 • Universal Screening • 9th and 10th grade • 3X per year • R-CBM and Maze • Math concepts and Applications (MCAP)
Present…2009-2010 • Tier 2 Intervention • Corrective Reading • Student Selection based on participation in a special education supplemental class • Progress Monitoring • Bi-weekly by AIMSweb maze • 4 times per year with R-CBM • Outcome Data • See handout
Present…2009-2010 • Tiers 1, 2, and 3 • PBS training • Planning phase for Tier 2 and Tier 3 math and reading interventions
Future…2010-2011…and beyond • Screening • New enrollments • At risk students • Maze • Universal screening at end of year • Tier 1 Instruction • PBS • RTI teams developed • Problem solving/referral process re-designed
Future…2010-2011…and beyond • Tier 2 Intervention • Read 180 (grades 9 and 10) • Students selected based on Maze, 8th grade OAT, teacher recommendation • Progress monitored one time per month using maze • Data analyzed prior to end of each semester • Math intervention (grades 9 and 10) • Students selected based on Spring MCAP, OAT, teacher recommendation • Progress monitored one time per month with MCAP • Data analyzed prior to end of each semester
Future…2010-2011…and beyond • Tier 2 Intervention • Structured study hall • Target: Organization, work completion and study skills • 9th grade regular education students • Students selected based core class failures, attendance, teacher recommendation
Future…2010-2011…and beyond • Tier 3 Intervention • Corrective Reading (grades 9 and 10) • Students selected based on Spring Maze data, OAT, and teacher recommendation • Progress monitored bi-weekly using maze • Data analyzed monthly by Reading RTI team
Making sound eligibility decisions as a district Problem Solving Process Policies and Procedures Manual Student Support Services Website