580 likes | 819 Views
IT Briefing. September 2006. IT Briefing Agenda 9/21/06. SWE Updates Manage IT Upgrade Blackboard Overview Web Approach NetCom Q&A. Karen Jenkins Karen Jenkins Sandra Butler Karen Jenkins Paul Petersen. October 19 Briefing 10:15 – 1:30 – MS to attend: 1 hour for Product Roadmap
E N D
IT Briefing September 2006
IT Briefing Agenda 9/21/06 • SWE Updates • Manage IT Upgrade • Blackboard Overview • Web Approach • NetCom Q&A • Karen Jenkins • Karen Jenkins • Sandra Butler • Karen Jenkins • Paul Petersen • October 19 Briefing 10:15 – 1:30 – MS to attend: • 1 hour for Product Roadmap • 1 hour for Vista and Office 2007 MS to provide lunch. Please RSVP to: sebreana.williams@emory.edu
Software Express • Microsoft access • Student employees no longer given access • Sponsored accounts & retirees • No longer given access • Examining all applications against our contracts and will make adjustments accordingly • Any issues?
Manage IT Karen Jenkins Andrew Kincaid Al Shelton
Remedy Modules Service Desk Change Management Action Request System Service Level Management Asset Management
Remedy Upgrade – Heads up! • Major new release v7.0 • More ITIL compliance • Multi-tenancy • Additional categorization – from 3 levels to 6/7 (product & operational) • Cleaner look – left navigation & top navigation • Solutions/knowledgebase – added user flag • Definitive Software Library (DSL) • CMDB – with new tools to assist the build, graphical view • REMOVED the “teaser” apps
Service Desk (Help Form) • New name for Help Desk module • Largest graphical change is top ITIL process bar • 2 types of Requests (ITIL compliance) • Incident • Problem • Task management added (use with incidents, problems, or change requests) • New canned reports • Enhanced problem management, new form • Work log renamed to Work Info (table based) • Other fields renamed (such as severity to impact) • Decision tree and scripts
Change Management • Module now required to create any type of change request • More/tighter integration with Configuration Management, DSL, & CMDB • Closed loop change • Change calendar w/ business events • Set varying approval levels – even auto-approve – so process is not bogged down • Save high risk changes for CAB
Other Applications • Service Level Management • Ability to compute overall SLA compliance with multiple weighted targets • Performance targets via SNMP interface (SMARTS) • Asset Management • Better integration with Configuration Management (aka Marimba) • DSL contains a product dictionary • Software license management
Input & Schedule • First TechTalk tomorrow 2:00-3:30 NDB 225 Kennesaw • 10/13, 11/3, 11/24 • Will also updates at IT Briefing • Target installation => October • Go-live => TBD • Initial scope = migrate current functionality & data
? Questions Manage IT
Blackboard @EmorySandra ButlerManager, Interactive Technologies TeamIT Briefing 09/21/06
Adam Lipkin Marcy Alexander Tricia Goddard Kathy Hayes David Lower Julia Leon Marianne Schneider Open Slot Interactive Technologies Team
Interactive Technologies • LearnLink • Blackboard • classes.emory.edu • classes@emory.edu • Insight • Wimba
What is Blackboard (Bb)? • Academic Suite • Learning System • Community System • Content System • Building Blocks • Add-ins that extend capability and functionality
Course and Content Authoring Assessment Engine Assignment Manager Online Gradebook Discussion Board Email Class Virtual Chat Group Management Course Reporting and Statistics Performance Dashboard/Review Status (recent upgrade) Bb Tools more available via Building Blocks and Course Cartridges
History: Bb at Emory 1999: review Bb CourseInfo versus WebCT teaching & learning at anytime from anywhere 2000: University adopts Bb 5; upgrade to Course & Portal Manager depts, orgs, and clubs; customizable buttons; building blocks announcement (Bb Inc.) 2002: upgrade to Bb 5.5 Enterprise Bb app server & Oracle db server; move to 24/7 data center; custom script for enrollment; Emory’s GenLib developers release e-reserves interface for Bb; branding 2004: upgrade to Bb 6.1 LDAP enabled; PS feeds via Bb snapshot utility; dual servers in PROD and DEV
History: Bb at Emory 2005: license Content System; SSL & load balanced; upgrade to Bb 6.2 file mgmt; content sharing; ePortfolios; passes to entire community and guests; Wimba Building Block trial 2006: Reorganize / AAIT / ATS / Interactive Technologies app system support transition; upgrade to Bb 6.3; RSPH migrates to University Bb servers; add’l training and outreach (ex. JIT sessions, custom training sites, etc.); increased non-academic and training usage; Wimba Building Block added 2007: Enhance integration w/other IT resources review overall structure: enhance processes; improve infrastructure
Bb at Emory Stats 09/18/06 2:00pm • 3,255 courses • 1,772 active courses (08/06 – current) • 163 organizations • 104 active organizations (08/06 – current) • includes intranets, student forums and groups, faculty/staff groups and committees
Bb & Insight integration made easy
Proposed Web Approach September 2006
Agenda • Current environment • Initial plan • Revised plan • Architecture goals • Draft architecture • Estimated timeline • Outstanding issues
Gecko & Maple • Focused on the needs of the hard core developer community • Maple Issues: • Difficult to support & maintain due to multiple customizations (Apache, “ITD WebDrive”) • Security issues • Old hardware
Initial Plan • Update hardware • Update software • But what are the most common needs of the community • Does this hit the mark … Stabilize, re-group, gather requirements
Stabilize • Split SiteMinder / non-SiteMinder sites • Solved the performance issues identified in March ‘06 • Upgrade CF to 7.1 (Maple) • Containment capabilities improve stability • Majority of code in CF – allowed for early testing prior to new architecture • Identify high risk security issues • Plan in place to implement changes
Community Requirements • Developers only need a couple of additional features: • MySQL, shell access on Dev, stability • Resource and/or skill set constrained users are the majority • Analysis indicates there are many static sites and others with basic/common minor dynamic components (~77%) • One size does not fit all …
Revised Plan • Place focus on the majority and the current gaps • Build a tiered service offering • target different customers/needs • Build tool kit for common needs • Provide more applications • Improve documentation
Web Approach • Standard Hosting • Users with limited resources needing to quickly and easily publish static websites • Advanced Hosting • Users with advanced developments skills creating dynamic sites and/or web applications • Enterprise Hosting • Users creating mission critical enterprise websites and/or enterprise web applications Tiered service offerings dependant upon user needs
Architecture Goals • Low entry-barrier • Consolidate where possible • Improved isolation / management • Seamless scalability • Highly secure • High stability, availability, and performance
Project Scope Phase 1 and beyond
Project Scope • Design & implement new robust web infrastructure • Create mandatory tools • Administration/provisioning • File management • Necessary scripts for Standard • Improve existing documentation • Migrate current Maple sites • AAIT to move sites and test • AAIT to create required documentation • Site owners to test & validate