1 / 11

The UHH Detector Laboratory

Outline: Projects Expertise and Infrastructure Examples. Universität Hamburg Institut für Experimentalphysik Detektorlabor. The UHH Detector Laboratory. Doris Eckstein MC-PAD Kick-Off Meeting, CERN, 13./14.1.2009. The Institute of Experimental Physics. has groups working on:

edith
Download Presentation

The UHH Detector Laboratory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Outline: Projects Expertise and Infrastructure Examples Universität Hamburg Institut für Experimentalphysik Detektorlabor The UHH Detector Laboratory Doris Eckstein MC-PAD Kick-Off Meeting, CERN, 13./14.1.2009

  2. The Institute of Experimental Physics • has groups working on: • Particle Physics and Detector Physics • ATLAS, CMS, ZEUS, H1, HESS, ILC, OPERA • Accelerator Physics • FLASH, PETRA III, XFEL, ILC • Laser- and X-Ray Physics • DYNAMIX, X-Ray Spectroscopy, STM, SXRD Physics Department

  3. R&D Projects of the Detector Lab Development of radiation hard silicon detectors • Marie Curie International Training Network MC-PAD: P2 ‘Hybrid Pixel Detectors’ and P3 ‘Radiation Hard Crystals / 3D Detectors’ • RD50 Collaboration: Radiation hard Silicon materials/sensors • CMS SLHC upgrade: Central European Consortium – Silicon Sensors for tracking at intermediate to large radii • Helmholtz Alliance: Virtual Detector Lab and radiation hard silicon sensors for SLHC • HPAD-XFEL

  4. Silicon Detectors for Vertexing and Tracking Silicon detectors: • are used for vertexing, lifetimes, triggering, tracking, even dE/dx • are used in all current HEP experiments • detect MIPs • are fast (~10ns) and precise (~10μm) • (crazy geometries, run in vacuum, cover large surface) • are radiation tolerant LHC starting 2008: • Luminosity L = 1034cm-2s-1 • in 10 years (500 fb-1) F (r=4cm) ~3·1015cm-2 • Oxygenated Silicon (ROSE-Collaboration RD48) • replacement might be necessary • sLHC starting 201x: • Luminosity L = 1035 cm-2s-1 • in 5 years (2500 fb-1) F (r=4cm) ~ 1.6·1016 cm-2 • new materials/technologies under investigation (RD50 Collaboration)

  5. Radiation Damage in Silicon Sensors • Two general types of radiation damage: • Bulk damage due to Non Ionizing Energy Loss • - displacement damage, built up of crystal defects – • Change of Effective Doping Concentration Neff • type inversion • higher depletion voltage  possibly under-depletion  loss of signal, increased noise • junction moves from p+ to n+ side • influenced by impurities in Si (oxygen, carbon,…)  defect engineering, material dependence! • Increase of Leakage Current • shot noise  thermal runaway, power consumption  hard to bias  temperature dependent  need cooling • Increased carrier Trapping • Charge loss  at 1016cm-2λ≤20μm charge collection distance! • Surface damage due to Ionizing Energy Loss • accumulation of charge in the oxide (SiO2) and Si/SiO2 interface  inter-strip capacitance (noise factor), breakdown behavior, … CMS MC-PAD RD50 HPAD-XFEL

  6. R&D to develop materials, technologies and simulations for Silicon sensors modules at intermediate to large radii of a new CMS tracker for SLHC • Establish a sensor technology valid for the outer radii of the tracker • Investigate the maximum durable irradiation fluence •  minimum possible radius • Stick to planar technology and strixel-like structures, with the possibility of inlcuding a 2nd metal layer for signal routing • Provide a single connection technology and minimize material budget by combining sensor and readout

  7. Expertise and Infrastructure • Irradiation campaigns (CERN, Ljubljana, Stockholm, Darmstadt, Karlsruhe, DORIS,…) • Macroscopic damage vs. time/annealing for different materials • Leakage current Ileak I/V (Probe stations, also cooled) • Neff  Vdep  C/V (Probe stations, also cooled) • CCE  τe,h Transient Current Technique • Nox, Neff  sensor stability  C/V (Probe station, also cooled) • evolution with time  annealing (ovens) • overall performance  multi-channel TCT (new) test beam • Microscopic damage vs. time/annealing for different materials: Thermally Stimulated Current, Deep Level Transient Spectroscopy • characterisation of damage levels (introduction rate, energy level, ) • kinetics vs. time/annealing • relate to macroscopic damage Overall detector performance • Multi-channel TCT • Test beam • Incorporate results I. and II. into simulation of • sensor “static” (ISE TCAD) • charge collection

  8. Optimization of Sensor Design - Strategy

  9. 2.5 GHz Scope automated control (PC) defined set-up optics 32 channels linear tables high intensity sub-ns laser Example Setup: Multi-Channel TCT • TCT (Transient Current Technique) records the time-resolved current of the device under test. • Inject laser light  record pulse shape • With multiple channels: add sensitivity to position, record neighbouring strips/ pixels Example: 300 V, Spotsize FWHM 5 µm injection of 660 nm light from backside (holes)

  10. Example: Microscopic - Macroscopic • Radiation damage – reverse current • No known point defects responsible – cluster defects? • found a means to measure cluster concetration by using the bistability of E4 and E5 C(T0)-C(Tanneal) vs. I(T0)-I(Tanneal) n-irradiated, 3x1011 cm-2

  11. Summary Aims: • quantitative understanding of Si sensor performance in harsh radiation environment • improve sensor performance • optimize sensor design (for given material, dose/fluence) Techniques: • Measurements macroscopic: I/V, C/V, TCT, multi-TCT microscopic: DLTS, TSC • Simulations of sensor ‘static’ and ‘dynamic’ properties

More Related