1 / 8

Phi meeting

Phi meeting. Richard Seto Aug 30, 2007. Status analysis. All KK done (?) ee (goals – end of Sep for final) AuAu waiting for analysis from hiroshima dAu waiting for analysis from Yuji pp got prelim stamp ee and KK – do they match?. Status. AuAu ee:

edolie
Download Presentation

Phi meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Phi meeting Richard Seto Aug 30, 2007

  2. Status analysis • All KK done (?) • ee (goals – end of Sep for final) • AuAu • waiting for analysis from hiroshima • dAu • waiting for analysis from Yuji • pp • got prelim stamp • ee and KK – do they match?

  3. Status • AuAu ee: • AuAu ee/KK paper Waiting for analysis from Hiroshima – paper will include folks from Weitzman and Hiroshima (and perhaps more- • the direction of this paperdepends on Yuji’s result • pp paper

  4. Data as much as I have • We need to finalize what we have • waiting for new ee points ee dAu from Itzhak (error stat only) data from for dAu and pp from nopid analysis (AN600) AuAu from PID analysis of Maxim no dndy for ee(pp) yet

  5. Getting to a Final • AuAu • ee • Weitzman – Sasha+Itzhak +Zeev • Yoshihide - Hiroshima (new analysis) • KK Maxim – TOF only analysis, Dipali/Debsankar- PID analysis (consistent?) • dNdy calculated in An 414 • ee and KK not consistent at lower centralities • dAu • ee • Weitzman – Sasha+Itzhak +Zeev • Yuji – Hiroshima (new analysis) • KK – Maxim, Yuji, Victor, Sasha M. – do we have a dN/dy? • consistent with previous pid analysis (within statistics) • KK and ee not consistent • pp • ee – Deepali, Kotaro, Torsten – 3 analysis at prelim are consistent – no dN/dy yet • KK – Maxim, Yuji, Victor, Sasha M. no dN/dy yet? • consistent with previous pid analysis (within statistics) • KK and ee not quite consistent

  6. Cross Section omega ds/dy (mbarn) Extracted by integration OMEGA: 3.50 +/- 0.18 (stat) +/- 0.88 (sys) 4.37 (upper sys) 2.62 (lower sys) PHI: 0.37 +/- 0.02 (stat) +/- 0.09 (sys) 0.46 (upper sys) 0.28 (lower sys) phi ds/dy (p0) = 45.6 mbarn Ratio OMEGA: 0.077 +/- 0.004 (stat) +/- 0.02 (sys) PHI: 0.0081 +/- 0.00044 (stat) +/- 0.0019 (sys)

  7. Are we still on track? • new analysis in dAu, AuAu ee • finalize ee in pp • finalize prelim analysis of KK in all three systems • begin drafting AuAu paper? include Yoshihide’s analysis as it comes?

More Related