1 / 16

Why Biologists Need Sampling, Experimental Design, and Statistics

Why Biologists Need Sampling, Experimental Design, and Statistics. Based on Chapter 1 of D. Heath (1995). An Introduction to Experimental Design and Statistics for Biology . CRC Press. What do biologists “do”?. Biologists study the living world through observation and experimentation

Download Presentation

Why Biologists Need Sampling, Experimental Design, and Statistics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Why Biologists Need Sampling, Experimental Design, and Statistics Based on Chapter 1 of D. Heath (1995). An Introduction to Experimental Design and Statistics for Biology. CRC Press.

  2. What do biologists “do”? • Biologists study the living world through observation and experimentation • Two types of scientific questions: • Description (“WHAT?” questions) • Explanation (“HOW?” questions)

  3. QUESTION: What is the mass of a M & M ?

  4. In-Class Exercise • 1 person from each group will come up and choose 10 M &M from a jar • Each group will then use a balance to measure the mass of each of these 10 beans • Finally, each group will characterize the mass of the M & M in the jar

  5. QUESTION: What is the mass of a M & M? • We could say the “true value” is: 1.63 g • Is it correct to say this? • NO, because there is always variation associated with our measurements!

  6. VARIABILITY • Experimental variation: variability introduced by the observer/experimenter or by the techniques and equipment used • Organismal variation: natural variability in genotypes and phenotypes • Spatiotemporal variation: variability in the spatial and/or temporal distribution of organisms, ecosystems, etc. • PROBLEM: all of this variability gets in the way of (or should be a part of?) our attempts to describe and explain the living world!

  7. How do we deal with variability? • One approach is to measure every single entity in every possible location of our population of interest (NOTE: this may not always be a “biological population”) • BUT, this is rarely possible in practice! • Potential solution: we measure a subset of all the possible entities (i.e., a sample) and use these values to make inferences about the population

  8. Sampling and Experimental Design • We want our sample to be representative of all the possible observations in the population • Potential problems: • Bias: when certain observations occur more or less frequently in the sample than they do in the population • Sampling variation: chance variation in the makeup of a sample (aka, “sampling error”) • We can use the principles of experimental design to develop a sampling strategy that minimizes these problems

  9. Sampling and Statistics We can assume that there is a “true value”, however: • Even with an effective sampling strategy, it will never be possible to obtain the “true” population value (due to sampling variation) • BUT, we can use statistical analysis to get a measure of how close our sample estimate is to the “true” value

  10. Beyond Description: Explanation • Describing biological patterns is important, but we also want to understand the processes that generated the observed patterns • Explanation: involves identifying the factors or causes of what has been described • PROBLEM: the complexity and variability of biological systems often means there are many possible factors involved

  11. EXAMPLE: Predator-Prey Relationships Predator density Prey density Environment

  12. Observational Studies(aka, “Natural Experiments”) • After making hypotheses about potential factors, we can take advantage of naturally occurring variation in the factors to test for differences in the association among the variable of interest • Common in ecology • Problem: such studies cannot determine the direction of cause-and-effect (i.e., causal connections)

  13. Manipulative Experiments • The investigator sets up the experiment so that the treatments differ only in the factor(s) of interest • Can be laboratory, greenhouse, or field experiments • Because we reduce possible confounding factors, we have much more confidence in the causal relationship between the factor(s) and the response variable

  14. Experimental vs. Observational Studies • While manipulative experiments are the most effective method of establishing causal relationships, they have some drawbacks: • Focus on only a few factors • Experimental manipulation of factors may not be representative of “natural” conditions • Often limited to relatively small spatiotemporal scales • May not be feasible due to legal, ethical, and/or practical considerations

  15. Summary • The starting point of all studies should be one or more well-defined research questions • Sampling, experimental design, and statistical analysis are crucial to almost all biological studies • It is essential to consider these three issues together and, ideally, before any of the practical work of the study is carried out

  16. For next class: • Read Chapter 6 of Gotelli and Ellison (2004) • Read Hurlbert (1984 ) • Prepare a brief written summary (1 page) on an example of experimental design including: • Your research question and hypothesis • How you plan to eliminate alternative explanations and control for confounding factors as you evaluate your hypothesis • Homework 1 is due August 31: • Read Ehrlen 1992 and Harvell 1992 and answer the following questions • How these studies were pseudo-replicated? • How did this affect the information he presents?

More Related