1 / 6

DESY Documentation: Status + projects

DESY Documentation: Status + projects. SPIRES input Merits / deficiencies Current collaborations Future projects. SPIRES input. Electronic material. Automatic extraction of bibl data. New records, standardization + aff, expnr, coll. SPIRES HEP. Publication notes. keywords.

edwinjones
Download Presentation

DESY Documentation: Status + projects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DESY Documentation:Status + projects • SPIRES input • Merits / deficiencies • Current collaborations • Future projects Annette Holtkamp

  2. SPIRES input Electronic material Automatic extractionof bibl data New records, standardization + aff, expnr, coll SPIRES HEP Publication notes keywords Paper material Manual records Bibliographic records for journal articles, conference proceedings, books,non-arXiv preprints Annette Holtkamp

  3. SPIRES input Bibliographic data: • title, authors, publication note, rep nr, url, doi • affiliations, collaboration + experiment nr (link to exp database) • link to conf database • content classification (analogous to arXiv) + standardized keywords • formal classification (talk, review, book, jnl article…) Acquisition of material: • toc alerts, xml data delivery, regular scans of known sites • active web search (conf procs, theses…) Annette Holtkamp

  4. Merits - deficiencies Merits: • comprehensive: preps + jnls + conf procs + books • content based selection • extensive data: aff, coll, exp nr, author kw, pacs • human quality control, standardization • content classification + standardized keywords Deficiencies: • no citations for journals and conference proceedings • lack of automatization (e.g. no automatic recognition of affiliations) • time-delayed input (no temporary entries) • meagre exploitation of keyword potential Annette Holtkamp

  5. Current collaborations • SPIRES (SLAC, Fermilab) • Data delivery SPIRES c CDS • CERN articles, recently added or updated • recent non-arXiv preprints • HEP taxonomy + automatic keywording (CERN) • SCOAP3 (CERN + …) Annette Holtkamp

  6. Future projects • Journal citations(SLAC/CERN) • HEP taxonomy + automatic keywording(CERN + EPFL?) • Marie Curie training network -------------------------------------------------------------------- • Journal abstracts c abstracts database (only for searches) • Automatic recognition of affiliations • Unique author – affiliation relation • Scanning of paper material, extraction of bibliographic data • Mapping of author keywords onto standardized keywords Annette Holtkamp

More Related