140 likes | 338 Views
3D Indoor Positioning System SD May 11-17. Faculty Advisor: Dr. Daji Qiao. Members: Dan Guilliams – CprE Nicholas Allendorf – CprE Adam Schuster – CprE Christopher Daly – CprE Andrew Joseph – EE. Client: Virtual Reality Application Center. Problem Statement.
E N D
3D Indoor Positioning SystemSD May 11-17 Faculty Advisor: Dr. DajiQiao Members: Dan Guilliams – CprE Nicholas Allendorf – CprE Adam Schuster – CprE Christopher Daly – CprE Andrew Joseph – EE Client: Virtual Reality Application Center
Problem Statement • Currently, there exists no inexpensive system that is able to accurately localize object in three-dimensional space. • We are concerned with small scale and high accuracy, unlike GPS. • Such a system could be used as an input device/controller to a computer system. • It could be used for virtual reality systems, touch tables, or a “Minority Report”-style UI. • Our goal is to create such a system, capable of tracking multiple objects.
Objective • Design and build a 3D indoor positioning system (IPS) for VRAC applications such as multi-touch table or touch wall. • The end product is to provide fingertip tracking with 1 cm accuracy. • Twomain components: • IPS Device: Worn on fingertips, or embedded in a glove • IPS Infrastructure: Detects location of IPS Devices
Functional Decomposition (Modules) • Multiple, reproducible tracking devices • Tracking methods • Received signal strength • Infrared beacons and cameras • Ultrasonic emitters • Hybrid (Accelerometers and gyros paired with localization) • A minimum of 15Hz refresh rate on position
Functional Requirements • Provide position updates with 1 cm accuracy within a 2 m x 2 m x 2 m region indoors • Give position updates 15 times per second • Display position in a graphical interface • Support as many simultaneous devices as possible
Non-Functional Requirements • Small, lightweight device • Durable device • Device with long battery life (a few weeks) • Easy to set up infrastructure • Reproducible devices with consistent quality
Constraints • Small device size limits choice of technology • Need for battery life forces much of the work to be done by the infrastructure • Want the system to be as non-intrusive as possible (no annoying beeps or lights) • In order to distinguish devices, some part of the device must be distinguishable to infrastructure
Risks and Mitigation • Finding the right technology for the task, need to do strong research and prototyping • Research needs to be completed on schedule so the project does not fall behind • Requirements are challenging and aiming for them could lead to coming up short, need to design the system such that there is room to give
Cost Estimate • Parts and materials: • Unknown at this time ~$1000 • Labor ($20/hr) • Chris Daly $2800 • Adam Schuster $2800 • Daniel Guilliams $2800 • Andrew Joseph $2800 • Nicholas Allendorf $2800 • Total ~$15000