750 likes | 963 Views
Learning. Foundation of Behaviorism Promoted by John B. Watson Psychology… should be an objective science study behavior not mental processes. Definition of Learning.
E N D
Learning • Foundation of Behaviorism • Promoted by John B. Watson • Psychology… • should be an objective science • study behavior not mental processes
Definition of Learning • Learning is an adaptive1 permanent change2 in behavior or behavior potential3 that is produced as a result of prior experience4 • 1 occasionally maladaptive such as depressed mental set, obsessions • 2 not due to fatigue, injury • 3 includes tendencies to respond that might not have been tested • 4 excludes maturation, disease, instinct
Learning Can there be learning that does not result in a change in behavior? • Types of Learning • Habituation (simple, single stimulus) • Associative Learning (simple, passive, external) • Cognitive Learning (complex, strategic, internal)
Habituation • Simplest form of learning • Response to repeated stimulus declines across repetitions. • Not due to fatigue because response will reoccur if stimulus is changed. • non-associative learning as it involves only one stimulus. • Associative learning involves two stimuli (one is associated with the other).
Association • Learning to associate two events Event 1 Event 2 Sea snail associates splash with a tail shock Seal learns to expect a snack for its show-off behavior
Associative Learning • Classical Conditioning – associating two stimuli, generally one acts as a signal for the other • Operant Conditioning – associating a behavior and its consequences
Two related events: Stimulus 1 Lightning Stimulus 2 Thunder Result after repetition Stimulus We see lightning Response We wince anticipating thunder Classical Conditioning • We learn to associate two stimuli – one signals the other
Response: Pushing vending machine button Consequence:Receiving a candy bar Operant Conditioning • We learn to associate a response with its consequence
Classical or Pavlovian Conditioning • Ivan Pavlov • 1849-1936 • Russian neurophysiologist • studied digestive secretions • invented Classical Conditioning
Classical Conditioning • Pavlov’s device for recording salivation
Before Conditioning UCS (food in mouth) Neutral stimulus (tone) UCR (salivation) No salivation During Conditioning After Conditioning UCS (food in mouth) CS (tone) Neutral stimulus (tone) UCR (salivation) CR (salivation) Pavlov’s Experiment
Acquisition (CS+UCS) Strong Spontaneous recovery of CR Extinction (CS alone) Strength of CR Extinction (CS alone) Weak Pause Time Classical Conditioning
Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS) stimulus automatically triggers a response food in mouth Unconditioned Response(UCR) unlearned automatic response to unconditioned stimulus you salivate when food is in your mouth “physiological (hard-wired) association” Conditioned Stimulus (CS) neutral stimulus becomes associated with UCS triggers (conditioned) response Conditioned Response (CR) Nearly the automatic response But it is learned, slightly weaker (a bit less salivation in our example) Classical Conditioning
Effect of unreinforced trials (tone without food following it)
Classical Conditioning • Acquisition • the initial stage of learning, during which a response is established and gradually strengthened • Extinction • diminishing a conditioned response • occurs when an unconditioned stimulus does not follow a conditioned stimulus
Classical Conditioning • Spontaneous recovery • reappearance, after a rest period, of an extinguished conditioned response • Generalization • tendency for stimuli similar to the conditioned stimulus to evoke similar responses • Discrimination • the ability to distinguish between a conditioned stimulus and other similar stimuli that do not signal an unconditioned stimulus
Cognitive Development “Never hug and kiss them, never let them sit on your lap. If you must, kiss them once on the forehead when they say good night. Shake hands with them in the morning. Give them a pat on the head if they have made an extraordinarily good job of a difficult task. Try it out. In a week’s time you will find how easy it is to be perfectly objective with your child and at the same time kindly. You will be utterly ashamed at the mawkish, sentimental way you have been handling it.” —John Watson “Psychological Care of Infant and Child”
Classical Conditioning • Temporal Contiguity was thought to be sufficient – the CS simply needs to occur immediately prior to the UCS for conditioning to take place • Equipotentiality: any two stimuli could be associated through conditioning
Temporal Contiguity is Not Enough • Contingency: The CS must reliably predict the occurrence of the UCS (Rescorla, 1966) • Informativeness: The CS must provide new information for predicting the occurrence of the UCS
Informativeness: Blocking • If an organism has already learned that one CS predicts the UCS, that will block the conditioning of a new CS if the new CS does not provide any additional information • Example: Fear conditioning of a tone blocks conditioning of a light
Classical Conditioning • Goes awry • Normally neutral stimulus becomes signal of negative CR
UCS (drug) UCR (nausea) CS (waiting room) UCS (drug) UCR (nausea) CS (waiting room) CR (nausea) Nausea Conditioning among Cancer Patients
Classical Conditioning Drug Tolerance Example • Drug Tolerance • Drugs have less of an effect when taken repeatedly (less of a high) • Drug users crave more of the drug despite its lessening effects • Certain drugs trigger our body to call upon its defenses against the effects of the drug (parasympathetic or shutdown system)
Siegel (1977, 1983) • Demonstrated that classical conditioning principles might be in effect during drug-injecting episodes… • Possible reason for overdoses
Siegel (1977, 1983) • UCS ----------------------------------------------UCR (drug) (anti-drug defenses) • CS -----------------------------------------------NO RESPONSE (injection ritual) (no defenses) • CS + UCS --------------------------------------UCR (injection ritual) + (drug) (anti-drug defenses) * Repeated several times • CS -----------------------------------------------CR (injection ritual) (anti-drug defenses)
Siegel (1977, 1983) • Familiar setting--------------------anti-drug defenses (usual time, place, etc) (body reacts) • New setting ---------------------------- no defenses (place, time are different) (body doesn't react) • Same dosage becomes an overdose – they get too high as their bodies have been fooled by the new procedure, no signals to start dampening down of response
Atkinson, Krank, and McCully (1982) Lab rats preconditioned to tolerate large doses of heroin… Trial 1……….Room 1…………….Saline………Rats okay Trial 1……….Room 1…………….Drug……….Rats get high Trials 2-19 are identical to Trial 1… Trial 20…….Room 2…………….Saline………Rats okay Trial 20…… Room 2…………….Drug………..Rats die
Atkinson, Krank, and McCully (1982) • Results: • >50% increase in death rate in new room • Rats show "room-specific" tolerance • May explain overdoses in humans • Practical implications as far as detoxification is concerned (returning clean addict to street, friends)
Operant Conditioning • Law of Effect (Thorndike) • Rewarded behavior is repeated • Operant Conditioning • behavior strengthened if followed by reinforcement • behavior weakened if followed by punishment
A cat’s Behavioral Repertoire (here, for escaping an enclosed space)
Operant Conditioning • Operant Behavior • voluntary behaviors • operates [acts] on environment • Behavior Consequences • Reinforcer • any event that follows behavior AND strengthens it
Operant Conditioning • B.F. Skinner (1904-1990) • Built on Thorndike’s Law of Effect • Discovered schedules of reinforcement
Operant Conditioning • Operant Chamber (“Skinner Box”) • chamber with a bar that an animal can press to obtain a food reinforcer • Frequency of responses are recorded
Principles of Reinforcement • Primary Reinforcer • innate reinforcer, satisfies biological need • e.g., food, water, warmth • Secondary Reinforcer • conditioned reinforcer, gains its reinforcing power through association with primary reinforcer • e.g., money
Schedules of Reinforcement • Continuous Reinforcement • reinforcing the desired response each time it occurs • learning occurs rapidly • extinction occurs rapidly • Partial Reinforcement • reinforcing a response only part of the time • learning occurs slowly • resistance to extinction
Number of responses Fixed Ratio 1000 Variable Ratio Fixed Interval 750 Rapid responding near time for reinforcement 500 Variable Interval 250 Steady responding 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Time (minutes) Schedules of Reinforcement
Schedules of Reinforcement • Fixed Ratio (FR) • behavior is reinforced only after the behavior occurs a specified number of times • the faster you respond, the more rewards you get! • different ratios • very high rate of responding • like piecework pay
Schedules of Reinforcement • Variable Ratio (VR) • behavior is reinforced after an unpredictable number of times • like gambling, fishing • very hard to extinguish because of unpredictability
Schedules of Reinforcement • Fixed Interval (FI) • behavior is reinforced only after a specified time has elapsed • frequency of behavior increases when the time for reward draws near
Schedules of Reinforcement • Variable Interval (VI) • behavior is reinforced at unpredictable time intervals • produces slow, steady responding • like pop quiz!