270 likes | 438 Views
IPS in E urope. Research, practice and current challenges Tom Burns University of Oxford. Principles of IPS. Competitive employment Open to anyone who wants to work Rapid job search Attention to client preferences Time-unlimited support Integrated with mental health care
E N D
IPS in Europe Research, practice and current challenges Tom Burns University of Oxford
Principles of IPS • Competitive employment • Open to anyone who wants to work • Rapid job search • Attention to client preferences • Time-unlimited support • Integrated with mental health care • Personalised benefits counselling
US evidence • >13 studies (5 RCTs) consistently and overwhelmingly favour IPS over train and place • 20–60% obtain jobs in IPS • 10–20% in train and place • Accepted as the evidence-based standard
Why, then, a European study? • Good evidence from Assertive Community Treatment literature that Mental Health Services research into complex interventions may not travel • Opportunity to exploit differences in European context to illuminate processes
US and Europe very different • Employment culture • US ‘hire and fire’ versus European employment protection and stability • Welfare state provision • European benefits generally higher • Varies considerably across Europe
Benefit trap • Benefits > Salaries • Benefits to make up shortfall in salary; • UK, NT • Benefits ≈ salaries • Benefits linked to previous income; • DE & SW • Benefits < salaries • BG & IT (like USA)
Design and Method • Randomised control trial (RCT) in six European countries • Comparing ‘place and train’ (IPS) with ‘train and place’ • Psychotic patients with extensive unemployment • Randomisation at the patient level, • Stratified using minimisation technique by: • Centre, gender and work history • N=300, 50 from each centre • Assessments at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months • Primary outcome open employment for one day
Three questions • Is IPS effective in Europe? • Is its effectiveness influenced by broader social factors? • Does return to work for SMI patients involve health risks?
Conclusions • IPS is twice as effective in obtaining employment in Europe as standard rehab • 54.5% vs 27.6% • Close to US levels • Effect varies and is influenced by • Local unemployment rates • The benefit trap • Patients are not made unwell by IPS
Current UK IPS Trials • IPS + CBT module • IPS + motivational interviewing • IPS in first onset psychosis • IPS-LITE
IPS-LITE • 9 months, no job – refer back to MH team • ‘perhaps not the right time’ • ‘welcome back if things change’ • 9 months in job • 4 months persisting support with discharge clearly understood • Back to MH team or discharge
Hypotheses • Less effective but higher throughput thus more cost beneficial • Lower right hand corner of cost-benefit plane • More effective • Focuses both client and job coach on getting on with it
What are the challenges? SWAN Trial
What challenges from SWAN? • IPS in high unemployment - recession • Voluntary sector or Health services provision? • Differences between US and UK management cultures for services • Balancing principles • Rapid job search vs client choice • Training or quality control?
Thank you for you time Greetings from Oxford