1 / 22

Risk Changes Following Ex-Dates of Stock Splits

Risk Changes Following Ex-Dates of Stock Splits. Shen-Syan Chen National Taiwan University Robin K. Chou National Central University Wan-Chen Lee Ching Yun University. Introduction. Ex-dates for a stock split Changes in the number of shares outstanding and in the level of stock price

efrem
Download Presentation

Risk Changes Following Ex-Dates of Stock Splits

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Risk Changes FollowingEx-Dates of Stock Splits Shen-Syan Chen National Taiwan University Robin K. Chou National Central University Wan-Chen Lee Ching Yun University

  2. Introduction • Ex-dates for a stock split • Changes in the number of shares outstanding and in the level of stock price • Should not affect the distribution of stock returns • But, shifts in the riskiness of the stocks have been found • Stock return volatilities tend to increase significantly following split ex-dates

  3. Introduction • Increase in volatility after split ex-dates • Ohlson and Penman (1985), Lamoureux and Poon (1987), Dubofsky (1991), … • There have not been explanations for the increase in volatility • Microstructure biases do not explain the increase • Desai et al. (1998) and Koski (1998)

  4. Motivation • Analyze the changes in the riskiness of stocks following splits • Focus on the long-term influence of stock splits on return volatility • Up to five years subsequent to ex-dates • Previous studies examine shifts in stock return volatility for a short period, usually less than one year following the splits

  5. Motivation • Focus on changes in the components of equity risk • Identify the sources of changes in post-split stock return volatility

  6. Hypothesis • Equity risk contains systematic and unsystematic risks • Hypothesis 1. There is an increase in equity betas after stock splits • Hypothesis 2. There is an increase in the residual variance after stock splits

  7. Hypothesis • By Hamada (1972) • Hypothesis 3. Any increase in post-split equity betas is due to an increase in asset betas • Hypothesis 4. Any increase in post-split equity beta is due to an increase in financial leverage

  8. Hypothesis • Hypothesis 4. Increase in post-split betas result from changes in splitting firms’ asset structure • High capital expenditures which are offset by the sales of assets • Hypothesis 5. Increase in post-split betas result from market reassessment of the risk of the splitting firm’s existing assets • Lack of unusual investment activity for the splitting firms

  9. Data • Sample of stock splits • All splits from NYSE, AMEX and Nasdaq during 1981-1998 • Excludes regulated utilities and financial institutions • The splits must have a split factor of at least 25% • No cash dividends or other stock distribution of 25% or more within 5 years after the split

  10. Data • Matched samples (Lewis et. al (2002)) • Matched by industry (two-digit SIC), asset size (25% to 200% of the splitter), and normalized operating income (OIBD/Asset) • The comparison firm does not have any stock distribution of 25% or more within 5 years before and after the sample firm’s ex-date

  11. Methodology • Focus on the long-term influence of the splits on return volatility • Calculate risk measures for both sample firms and matched firms, then compare • To control for the industry effect • T-statistics and Wilcoxon signed rank statistics are calculated for testing differences in mean and median, respectively

  12. Empirical Results • Changes in total equity risk (Table 2) • Splitting firms in general have lower total equity risk than the control firms • Relative to non-splitting firms, splitting firms experience a significant increase in total equity risk in the first year after splits • The increases in total equity variances in the first year appear to be transitory

  13. Empirical Results • Changes in systematic risk (Table 3) • Splitting firms have higher systematic risk than the control firms, in contrast to the total equity risk results • Significant increase in systematic risk for splitting firms, relative to non-splitting firms in year +1 • Consistent with Hypothesis 1 • But, this increase also seems to be temporary (see results from year +2 to +5)

  14. Empirical Results • Changes in unsystematic risk (Table 4) • Splitting firms have lower unsystematic risk than the control firms • Significant increase in unsystematic risk for splitting firms, relative to non-splitting firms in year +1 • Consistent with hypothesis 2 • But, this increase seems to be temporary (see results from year +2 to +5)

  15. Empirical Results • Changes in asset risk (a component of the systematic risk) (Table 5) • Splitting firms generally have higher asset risk than control firms • Asset risk for splitting firms only increase in year +1, so it appears to be transitory • The post-split increases in equity betas are due to increases in splitting firms’ asset betas • Consistent with Hypothesis 3

  16. Empirical Results • Changes in financial risk (a component of the systematic risk) (Table 6) • Splitting firms have lower financial risk than control firms • The debt ratios of splitting firms do not increase after splits, relative to non-splitting firms • The post-split increase in equity betas are not due to increases in the splitting firms’ financial leverage • Inconsistent with Hypothesis 4

  17. Empirical Results • Why does asset risk change? (Table 7 & 8) • Changes in asset structure or market reassessment of the risk of existing assets? • A temporary increase in capital outlays for the splitting firms in year +1 is identified in Table 7 • From Table 8, there is no significant change in net capital outlays for the splitting firms • These imply that splitting firms are engaged in a replacement of assets in year +1 • Consistent with Hypothesis 5, rather than Hypothesis 6

  18. Empirical Results • Why stock return volatility increase temporarily after stock splits? • Asset restructuring in year +1 increases asset risk • Asset risk in turn increases equity risk • Equity risk increases result in stock return volatility increases • This study shed new light on the source of changes in post-split volatility

  19. Robustness Checks • Stock splits lead to a significant change in the trading activity of splitters • This may affect the estimates of systematic risk (Scholes and Williams (1977)) • Apply the AC method by Dimson (1979) to re-estimate equity betas and asset betas • Empirical results in the paper remain unchanged (Table 9 and Table 10)

  20. Robustness Checks • Daily data may be prone to bid-ask bounces and price discreteness errors • Use of weekly data can correct for this problem (Koski (1998)) • We use weekly data to re-estimate equity risk, systematic risk, unsystematic risk, and asset risk • Empirical results in the paper remain unchanged (Table 11)

  21. Conclusions • This study focus on the long-term influence of stock splits on return volatility • Splitting firms experience a significant increase in total equity variance in year +1 • But the increase is temporary • A result that has not been found before

  22. Conclusions • Identify sources of the changes in stock volatility subsequent to stock splits • The increase in stock volatility after stock splits is ultimately driven by the asset restructuring by the splitting firms • Asset restructuring induces increases in asset risk (business risk), systematic risk, and eventually total equity risk • Residual return variance also contribute • Financial risk does not change

More Related