1 / 22

Designer Buildings: An Evaluation of the Price Impacts of Signature Architects

Designer Buildings: An Evaluation of the Price Impacts of Signature Architects. Franz Fuerst, Pat McAllister and Claudia Murray University of Reading Henley Business School School of Real Estate and Planning . Research Question.

egan
Download Presentation

Designer Buildings: An Evaluation of the Price Impacts of Signature Architects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Designer Buildings: An Evaluation of the Price Impacts of Signature Architects Franz Fuerst, Pat McAllister and Claudia Murray University of Reading Henley Business School School of Real Estate and Planning

  2. Research Question Do offices designed by architects who have won the AIA Gold Medal and/or the Pritzker Prize command a rental premium? More specifically: Whether, ceteris paribus, commercial offices designed by signature architects achieve rental premiums compared to commercial offices designed by non-signature architects

  3. DEFINITIONS: ARCHITECTURE AND FAME Awards Competitions. Publications. Buildings Focus? Size? Client?

  4. DEFINITIONS: AWARDS To honour a living architect whose built work demonstrates a combination of those qualities of talent, vision, and commitment, who has produced consistent and significant contributions to humanity and the built environment through the art of architecture. PRITZKER PRIZE The Gold Medal is the highest honor that the American Institute of Architects can bestow on an individual. It is conferred by the national AIA Board of Directors in recognition of a significant body of work of lasting influence on the theory and practice of architecture. AIA GOLD MEDAL

  5. TRANSMISSION OF PRIZE TO PRICE Prize Better design? (Not considered) Cost ↑,Benefits ↑ Image benefits to =occupiers =owners =developers Enhanced prestige, recognizability Higher productivity? Price

  6. PREVIOUS EMPIRICAL RESEARCH Hough and Kratz (1983) Sample: Rents 139 National and/or Chicago designated landmarks in Chicago. Method: Hedonic regression Findings: Premium only for newer landmark offices , for older buildings the coefficient was negative in all model specifications but insignificant. Vandell and Lane (1989) Sample: Rents and vacancy rates of 55 Class A office buildings in Boston and Cambridge, Massachusetts. Method: Examined the relationship between aesthetic qualities and rents/vacancy rates. Findings: Buildings rated in the highest quintile in terms of aesthetics had rents that were 22% higher than buildings rated in the lowest quintile controlling for differences in location, number of stories etc. Gat (1998) Sample: 50 office buildings in Tel Aviv, rents, physical and location features. Method: Hedonic regression, rating of building and design quality by architects. Findings: Marginal contribution of quality of architecture variable of 5.4% ---highest of a non-location variable in the model.

  7. RESEARCH METHODS AND DATA DATA: CoStar This study draws on CoStar's comprehensive national database We have identified 490 office buildings designed by signature architects. In order to identify a control sample against which to compare the sample of buildings designed by signature architects, we have drawn upon the CoStar database (10,500 properties with full set of variables in our sample). (1) Hedonic regression modeling enables researchers to isolate the relative contribution of an attribute (or a bundle of attributes) and estimate the price effects. (2) Logistic regression: can be used to identify a suitable peer group based on probability scores. (3) Manual selection from database. Requires close inspection of property details and available comparables. METHODOLOGY

  8. Age • Quality • Tenant quality • Location • Lease structures • Size • Specifications METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES Given heterogeneity, key methodological problem is to control for differences between ODSAs and non-ODSAs. Isolating price premiums Spillover effects ODSA may lift rental rates in surrounding area. Sample selection Our definition of a signature architect is unavoidably arbitrary. Comparable buildings may be designed by high profile architects. Iconic buildings need to be considered – designed by signature architects of the 1920s and 1930s? Skill, brand or expense? Is an identified price difference due to superior design, iconic status or additional expenditure?

  9. DISTRIBUTION OF ODSAs IN AMERICA Chicago Boston New York San Francisco Washington Los Angeles

  10. BASIC DESCRIPTIVE STATS

  11. HEDONIC EQUATION Rentalrates Age of building (year of construction or major refurbishment) Size (sq.ft. of rentable space) Height (no. of stories) Size (sq.ft.) Lease type Location (submarket cluster) Building quality

  12. HEDONIC REGRESSION RESULTS - RENTS

  13. REGRESSION RESULTS – MID-TOWN RENTS

  14. HEDONIC REGRESSION RESULTS - PRICES

  15. Logit function Probability of ODSA Logistic regression: Maximum likelihood function, probability (P) constrained between 0 and 1 x

  16. Results of Logistic Regression

  17. Results of Logistic Regression

  18. Matched peer group characteristics

  19. RESULTS USING LOGIT GENERATED SAMPLE

  20. CONCLUSIONS/ FURTHER WORK • Hedonic analysis suggests a rent premium but peer group analysis based on results of logit model is inconclusive (raw averages vs. probability weighted) • Model sales transaction prices • Obtaining close comparables by manually selecting suitable properties from the CoStar database for each ODSA (case studies of NYC, LA and Chicago) • More in-depth study of specific contribution of signature architects required

  21. CONCLUSIONS/ FURTHER WORK • More comprehensive assessment of overall added value of signature architecture: Neighbourhood externalities, quality of interior space etc.

More Related