330 likes | 668 Views
Sovereign Immunity. Most common type of immunity defense usedNeed to first consider if it is a governmental agency since the idea rests on the concept that the state must give its consent to be sued. Reasons for Sovereign Immunity. Suing a public entity restricts the amount of funds that could be
E N D
1. Immunity A condition which protects against tort liability regardless of the circumstances
3 Types of immunity defense
Sovereign immunity
Charitable immunity
Civil liability immunity legislation
2. Sovereign Immunity Most common type of immunity defense used
Need to first consider if it is a governmental agency since the idea rests on the concept that the state must give its consent to be sued
3. Reasons for Sovereign Immunity Suing a public entity restricts the amount of funds that could be used for the public welfare
The idea that the state can do no wrong (historical)
The public cannot be held responsible for the torts of the governmental employees.
The trend has been recently to repeal or limit the idea of sovereign immunity
4. Sovereign Immunity Using sovereign immunity a distinction must be made between what is governmental activity and proprietary activity
Governmental activity
Activity that can only be performed by the state and is commonly protected by sovereign immunity
Proprietary activity
Activity done by the state but could be undertaken by the private sector and therefore cannot be protected by sovereign immunity
5. Tort Case 1 A 6 year old boy was playing with friends at a local swimming pool in Illinois. The boy dove off the 1 meter diving board and grazed his head on the board. The blow was sufficient enough to knock the boy unconscious. The boy sunk to the bottom of the 12 foot deep pool. His friends frantically alerted the lifeguard on duty at the diving well. The guard responded that the boy has “faked” an injury like that before and that he (lifeguard) was not going to fall for it again.
6. Tort Case 1 The friends alerted a second lifeguard who responded apathetically and did nothing. Finally, one of the friends went to the head lifeguard/pool manager who was located in the pool office. He rushed to the scene, dove in the water in an attempt to save the boy. After repeated attempts to revive the boy, the boy died. The parents of the boy sued the city parks department for recovery due to willful negligence. How much did the court award and why?
7. Verdict The court rules in favor of the Parks and Recreation department for 2 reasons:
As a governmental agency the department was entitled to sovereign immunity
The plaintiff’s could not prove that the inaction of the lifeguard was willful in that they could not prove that the lifeguard wanted the boy to die.
8. An 8th grade student broke his neck in physical education class after landing on his head in an attempt to do a headspring over a rolled mat. Quadraplegia resulted for the boy.
The instructor was a first year teacher who introduced the activity without appropriate lead up activities. The principal at the school did not participate in the development of the curriculum and delegated those duties to the first-year teacher.
9. Verdict The court found for the plaintiff on the grounds that it was negligent for the teacher not to introduce lead-up activities to make certain that the student could safely to the action.
The school system and the principal were found negligent through the theory of vicarious liability
10. Tort Case 3 A middle school physical education teacher in Tucson, Arizona reprimanded a student who “acting up” in his class by punishing the student after school. The punishment was for the boy to walk on his hands for 100 yards. Though the student was able to do so with difficulty it was not the extreme. The place that the student had to walk on his hands was the school parking lot which was black topped. The punishment took place in August of 2000 at 3:00 pm while the temperature was about 100 degrees. The student developed second hand burns on both hands.
11. Verdict The case is still pending however, the teacher was dismissed and after due process fired from the position.
12. Governmental Activity In the case of a public school using its own facility, the courts have usually found that the holding of athletic contests are part of the educational function of the state and is therefore a governmental function protected by sovereign immunity
13. Proprietary Activity If the facility is leased for use by the public sector, the courts have generally found that the school is conducting a proprietary activity (by leasing) and will therefore be liable for injuries sustained as a result of negligent maintenance or construction of the facility
14. Charitable Immunity Justifications:
Donations to charitable organization constitute a trust fund which may not be used for an unintended purpose
No profits have accumulated, so the doctrine of vicarious liability cannot be applied
Charities perform public or governmental duties and are therefore immune
The overall good of a charity is protected by not diverting its money to pay damage goods
15. Civil Liability Immunity Justification:
The increase of civil lawsuits threatens many individuals, especially volunteers, to participate.
Youth sport organizations cannot carry out their roles without fear of being sued for damages
16. Common Law Defense Need to identify if the risk could be foreseen by a reasonable and prudent professional
If the the answer is no, that is the defense
If the answer is yes, the question relates to the standard of care given. Was it satisfactory or did it fall short?
17. Consent Based on the consent of the participant or injured party and is a bar to recovery
To have this occur the following must happen:
Participation must be free and voluntary
The individual consents only to the risks inherent in the activity
The participants knowledge of the activity and understanding of their skill level
The participants understanding of the potential injuries inherent in the activity
18. Types of Primary Assumption of Risk Implied
Having knowledge of potential risks, the individual participates anyway
Express
A written or oral presentation in which the inherent risks are are categorically stated
19. Secondary Assumption of Risk Refers to the conduct of the participant in which the injury or damage is directly reflected from their failure to obey rules and warnings
20. Comparative Fault Basically a method of determining the damages award.
2 Ways to Determine Damage Awards
Pure form
1 million dollar suit in which the defendant is found to be 80% at fault and the plaintiff 20% of the award received by the plaintiff would be $800,000.
50/50
If the plainitff contributed more than 50% of the fault to the damages or injuries, there is no award
21. Contributory Negligence If the plaintiff’s negligent actions helped in any way to cause or aggravate an injury the plaintiff cannot win the lawsuit regardless of the negligence of the defendant
22. Warnings and Participation Forms Primary reasons for warnings are to communicate:
As to how a person should engage in the activity
What is required to prevent unreasonable risk of injury
The condition of the physical environment
Modifications needed to prevent injury
23. Warnings and Participation Forms For warnings to be effective they should:
Be obvious and direct
Specific to the risk
Understandable
Located at the point of the potential hazard
24. Participation Agreements Used to identify potential risks of the activity and to explain expectations for the participant.
Gives documentary evidence that efforts were made to inform and educate the participant.
Minors as well as parents should sign the participation form for the reasons given previously
25. Participation Agreements
A document in which the participant or his/her parents sign which identifies:
An understanding of the risks
An appreciation of the risks
An understanding of the safety rules and procedures
An agreement to comply with the safety and procedure rules
Specifically request that the person be allowed to participate in the activity
26. Releases Releases
A contract signed by the participants or their parents that absolve the institution, coach, or administration from liability if an injury is incurred
27. Releases Generally not considered valid by the courts because:
No one can legally waive the rights of another
Children considered minors cannot legally enter into contracts that waive their rights
Violates public policy and is therefore invalid
Courts do no like to grant pre-event protection of the participants from the consequences of their own actions
28. Releases May be valuable for adults, in the private sector when the following are available:
Options are reasonable and present
Adults better understand the risks and responsibilities
29. Privilege Allows a person to act in way that may usually be considered assault and battery
2 most common examples are:
Self-defense
Acting in defense of a third party
30. Self-Defense Varies by state
Need to question
Did the person use reasonable force to get away from the situation?
Did the person who was attacked retreat when the opportunity presented itself?
31. Third Party Defense Varies by state
Usually refers to people who are defending another family member
32. Assault Defenses If the defendant can prove that any of the 3 elements of assault is missing
defendant intend to cause harm or apprehension
plaintiff felt reasonable apprehension of imminent harm
no consent on the part of the plaintiff,
That is the primary defense.
Examples?
33. Battery Defenses 2 primary defenses are:
Touching was not intentional
Plaintiff consented to the touching
What are some examples?
34. Battery Defenses 2 primary defenses are:
Touching was not intentional
Plaintiff consented to the touching
What are some examples?