320 likes | 335 Views
Learn about the importance of studying neutrinos, their role in element formation, and their potential for future applications. Discover the SuperNEMO experiment and its goal to measure neutrino decay. Explore the NEMO-III detector and its findings, as well as the proposed design and sites for SuperNEMO. Join the international collaboration of scientists in this exciting research endeavor.
E N D
Search for 0nbb decay with SuperNEMO Ruben Saakyan UCL UCL_HEP/MSSL day out 18 July 2005
Outline • Neutrinos • 0nbb decay • NEMO-III • SuperNEMO
Why study neutrinos? • 2nd most abundant particle in the Universe photons ~ 107/m3 neutrinos ~ 3 106/m3 protons ~ 0.5/m3 • As many produced in Big Bang as photons. Crucial for element formation. • Only 1% of energy from supernova appears as photons. Other 99% is neutrinos. • Neutrinos are crucial for our understanding how the Sun shines. • Very important for heavy element formation in stars (CNO cycle). • Neutrino astronomy: the only way to study distant objects • Very far-future neutrino beams: search for oil and destroy WMD?
Why study neutrinos? • Essential part of the building blocks of matter and the Universe • Fundamental for understanding deep principles of nature • In Standard Model assumed to be massless • We now know they have non-zero mass • Neutrino mass – window beyond Standard Model
Absolute neutrino mass • Neutrino oscillations measure Dm2 can not solve this problem • For sure less than 0.0000000000000000000000000000000001 g • 3H decay (look at end point of b-spectrum) • Cosmology • 0nbb decay
Weighing neutrino. Cosmology. mi < 0.7 – 2.2 eV
Double beta decay and neutrino mass • Neutrino nature Dirac (n (anti)n vs Majorana (n = (anti)n) • The only way to answer this fundamental question • Absolute neutrino mass • Might be the only way to weigh n in a lab • Important consequences for particle physics, cosmology, nuclear physics
Double beta decay and neutrino mass DL=0 DL=2 ! Q
214Bi unknown 214Bi 0nbb 71.7 kgyr A controversial claim by Heidelberg-Moscow group (4.2s)
NEMO-3 AUGUST 2001
20 sectors B(25 G) 3 m Magnetic field: 25 Gauss Gamma shield: Pure Iron (e = 18 cm) Neutron shield: 30 cm water (ext. wall) 40 cm wood (top and bottom) (since march 2004: water + boron) 4 m Able to identify e-, e+, g and a The NEMO3 detector Fréjus Underground Laboratory : 4800 m.w.e. Source: 10 kg of isotopes cylindrical, S = 20 m2, e ~ 60 mg/cm2 Tracking detector: drift wire chamber operating in Geiger mode (6180 cells) Gas: He + 4% ethyl alcohol + 1% Ar + 0.1% H2O Calorimeter: 1940 plastic scintillators coupled to low radioactivity PMTs
Cathode rings Wire chamber PMTs Calibration tube scintillators bb isotope foils
bb2n measurement bb0nsearch bb decay isotopes in NEMO-3 detector 116Cd405 g Qbb = 2805 keV 96Zr 9.4 g Qbb = 3350 keV Sensitivity to mn ~ 0.2 – 0.4 eV by 2009 150Nd 37.0 g Qbb = 3367 keV 48Ca 7.0 g Qbb = 4272 keV 130Te454 g Qbb = 2529 keV 82Se0.932 kg Qbb = 2995 keV External bkg measurement natTe491 g 100Mo6.914 kg Qbb = 3034 keV Cu621 g (All enriched isotopes produced in Russia)
Transverse view Run Number: 2040 Event Number: 9732 Date: 2003-03-20 Longitudinal view Vertex emission Vertex emission Drift distance Deposited energy: E1+E2= 2088 keV Internal hypothesis: (Dt)mes –(Dt)theo = 0.22 ns Common vertex: (Dvertex) = 2.1 mm (Dvertex)// = 5.7 mm • Trigger: 1 PMT > 150 keV • 3 Geiger hits (2 neighbour layers + 1) • Trigger rate = 7 Hz Criteria to select bb events: • 2 tracks with charge < 0 • 2 PMT, each > 200 keV • PMT-Track association • Common vertex • Internal hypothesis (external event rejection) • No other isolated PMT (g rejection) • No delayed track (214Bi rejection) bb events selection in NEMO-3 Typical bb2n event observed from 100Mo Transverse view Run Number: 2040 Event Number: 9732 Date: 2003-03-20 Longitudinal view 100Mo foil 100Mo foil Geiger plasma longitudinal propagation Scintillator + PMT
From NEMO-III to SuperNEMO. Motivation. • Very successful technology. > 15 years of experience. • Quick start as a lengthy R&D is not needed • Next generation bb0n experiments should have at least one “bubble chamber”-like detector which will see a signature of bb events
SuperNEMO = NEMO3×10(20) + better DE/E • Sensitivity ~0.03 – 0.06 eV in 5 yr • Feasible ifZero BG experiment: • 1)No BG from radioactivity • the only possible BG from • 2n tail (NEMO-III) • 2) Improve DE/E from • existing (14%-16%)/E to • (7%-9%)/E* • *Demonstrated (UCL+ Bordeaux) DE/E = 8% at 1 MeV DE/E = 12% at 1 MeV
SuperNEMO. Possible Sites. • Frejus – France (new cavern) • Boulby – UK • Gran Sasso – Italy • Canfranc – Spain
Baseline conceptual design. Scintillator blocks SuperNEMO = submodule × 50 100 kg of 82Se (or other) in 2m×4m×40m + shielding 10-20,000 PMts/scintillator blocks
Possible alternative scintillator bar design Double sided readout If feasible can reduce the number of PMT’s to 3-5,000 as well as the floor area to ~12x12 m2
The UK group is part of the international Super-NEMO collaboration (UCL/MSSL, Manchester) This proposal is part of a coordinated approach with the French to start Super-NEMO UK/French groups have agreed on the sharing of the main work. Other collaborators (Russia, Czech Rep, Japan, US will contribute on a smaller scale) Money request for a 2 yr design study submitted by UK (PPRP), France (IN2P3), US (NUSAG). UK main contributions: Tracking detector Finish up ongoing scinitllator R&D UK involvement
MSSL involvement • Large scale production exploit MSSL technical expertise • New Lab space allows UK to bid for such big construction projects • MSSL main contributions • Tracking detector R&D + Wiring robot • SuperNEMO submodule production
Wiring robot The challenge: from 6,000 to ~60,000+ cells • Wires must be • strung • terminated • crimped • This can not be done • manually (~10 min/wire) • Complications • Copper pick-ups • Must be cost effective • Solder can not be used (radiopurity)
Tracker Read-out Electronics • Prompt signal from anode • wires (transverse coordinate) • Delayed signal from cathode • rings (longitudinal coordinate • TDC read-out with ~20 ns • resolution • Triggering based on track • parameters • Custom discriminator chip on or close to detector • Challenges: • Large number of channels (~60,000+) • High radiopurity
Tracker Front-End ASIC(Application Specific Integrated Circuits) • Design and prototype at UCL/MSSL • Amplifiers and discriminators with programmable threshould and zero suppression • Data collection and triggering/buffering/clock via serial link to minimise number of connections • Exact ASIC specifications need to be developed
Tracker Read-Out Boards • Design and prototype in close collaboration with UCL and Manchester HEP • Concentrator boards receive data from ASIC • provide data reduction and concentration • provide trigger data and first stage track reconstruction • Final read-out/track reconstruction/on-line monitoring via a DAQ PC farm. • FPGAs can be used to model ASIC for prototyping
SuperNEMO Milestones. • 2004 – 2005: ongoing scintillator R&D in UK, France, Russia, US • March 2005. Design study proposal submitted to UK and French funding agencies. UK answer after 24th August By mid 2007 • Full Technical Design • Prototype • Experimental site • 2007: Full Proposal • 2007 – 2010: Production • 2009-2010: Start taking data • 2014: planned sensitivity ~0.04 eV
Conclusions • Very exciting time for neutrino physics in general and 0nbb in particular • A positive signal is now a serious possibility in light of oscillation results • Costs of experiments in the £25M range: this is more than reasonable for the potential scientific gain • SuperNEMO is so far the only project which will look at 0nbb signature • Thanks to MSSL facilities UK (and specifically UCL) can be a crucial player in these and other large HEP projects