1 / 40

Reflective and non-reflective Highway Barriers

Reflective and non-reflective Highway Barriers. K. Polcak (MD SHA) And R.J. Peppin (Scantek, Inc.). TRB ADC 40 Summer Meeting, 2010, Denver, CO. Reflections of Noise and Highway Barriers. What source to use? Point? Multiple point? Line? What road type to use? Straight? Curved?

ehowes
Download Presentation

Reflective and non-reflective Highway Barriers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reflective and non-reflective Highway Barriers K. Polcak (MD SHA) And R.J. Peppin (Scantek, Inc.) TRB ADC 40 Summer Meeting, 2010, Denver, CO

  2. Reflections of Noise and Highway Barriers • What source to use? • Point? • Multiple point? • Line? • What road type to use? • Straight? • Curved? • What frequency to use? • What absorption coefficient to use?

  3. Assumptions • ISO 9613-2 propagation • Propagation of point sources • Line sources are represented by point sources appropriately spaced • Common barrier attenuation equation • Surface absorption of barriers from 0.0 to 1.0 • Up to two orders of reflection • Source 1-m above ground • Receiver 1.5-m above ground • Soft ground

  4. Basic Set-up

  5. No Barrier

  6. No Barrier

  7. 3m Barrier ά=1.0

  8. 5m Barrier ά=1.0

  9. 5m Barrier ά=1.0

  10. 10m and 10m Barriers ά=1.0

  11. 10m, 10m Barrier ά=1.0

  12. 10m, 10m Barrier ά=1.0, 0.0

  13. Higher Barrier is Absorping

  14. 10m, 3m Barrier ά=0.0, 1.0

  15. Higher Barrier is Reflecting

  16. 10m, 10m Barrier ά=0.0, 1.0

  17. 10m 3m Barrier Reflecting

  18. 10m 3m Barrier Reflecting

  19. 10m, 10m Barrier, Both Reflecting

  20. 10m, 10m Barrier, Both Reflecting

  21. 10m, 10m Barrier, Both Reflecting

  22. Reflective Barrier as Seen on Road

  23. Left- Blue =55 Right Last Blue = 55

  24. Several Point Sources 10m Apart

  25. Multi Sources Spread Sound

  26. No Barriers

  27. Line source

  28. No Barrier

  29. Line Source-Section Absorptive Reflective

  30. Improvement over No-barrier

  31. Curved road

  32. No Barriers

  33. Two 5m Barriers Reflective Absorptive

  34. Usefulness of Barriers on Curved Sections

  35. Sound Absorption sensitivity

  36. Sensitivity- NOT DEFINITIVE • Only calculated for 500 Hz • Trends should be good • Results dependent not only on sound absorption coefficient, ά, but also on size of barrier • High sound absorption coefficients at low frequency for low barriers don’t really make sense. • You need big barriers to reflect low frequencies

  37. A 5m BarrierAbout 1 dB difference from 0.0 to 1.0

  38. Some Tentative Conclusions • Better to have a barrier than not- most times • Better to have absorptive than not! • Reflective might be worse than nothing in some instances. • Curves • Residents in multi-story buildings • Differences in sound absorption coefficient of less than perhaps 0.3 is worth squat. • Before putting in reflective barriers do a study to see if it makes sense

More Related