40 likes | 161 Views
The 600A corrector can be split into 3 categories with different functionalities. Each 600 A LHC corrector circuit fall into one, two or the three categories. Squeeze for the mains in IR1 & IR5. Quadrupole gradient [T/m] from Q1 to Q6 as a function of b * :
E N D
The 600A corrector can be split into 3 categories with different functionalities. Each 600 A LHC corrector circuit fall into one, two or the three categories
Squeeze for the mains in IR1 & IR5 Quadrupole gradient [T/m] from Q1 to Q6 as a function of b*: beam1 (left) and beam2 (right) Rather smooth and/or monotonous (note Q6 going to very low gradient which will be the limiting circuits below b* ~2m ).
Squeeze for the trims QTL11, QT12 and QT13 Quadrupole gradient [T/m] in the trim quadrupoles (QTL11,-QT12,QT13) as a function of b*: beam1 (left) beam2 (right) • More “erratic’’ with big jump at b* ~2m and 5 m, with unavoidable zero-crossing for both beams
Target obtained on dI/dt and d2I/dt2 (guess-estimate in some cases) • 0) : The acceleration means what it means!.. i.e. I(t)=I(0)+(dI/dt) × t + 1/2 × (d2I/dt2 )× t2 • 1) : d2I/dt2 further pushed by a factor of 3 for MO’s (starting of the ramp above 2 TeV not yet defined) and for MQSX,MCBX2 & 3 (requirement during squeeze not yet known if large dynamic b-beating). • 2) : d2I/dt2 could be compromised (reduced) for MCBX1 … but the parallel separation has to be switched off as quickly as possible to bring the beams into collision (to avoid parasitic collision at very small separations during a too long period). Is dI/dt sufficient to warrant a degaussing cycle of the corrector after each fill??