1 / 30

Networking visit of SEE QA experts to the Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) and the Bologna Secr

Networking visit of SEE QA experts to the Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) and the Bologna Secretariat. BUCHAREST, ROMANIA 19 – 20 OCTOBER 2011. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS). QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ROMANIAN EDUCATION.

eilis
Download Presentation

Networking visit of SEE QA experts to the Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) and the Bologna Secr

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Networking visit of SEE QA experts to the Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) and the Bologna Secretariat BUCHAREST, ROMANIA 19 – 20 OCTOBER 2011

  2. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ROMANIAN EDUCATION

  3. Quality assurance in Romanian Education Provisions of government emergency ordinance(GOE) regarding quality assurance in education, no. 75/2005,approved by the law no. 87/2006, modified byGOE 75/2011 - main operationalconcepts for quality in education : • Quality assurance (internal) • Evaluation and control (internal & external) • Improvement (internal)

  4. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) • 1993: Law no. 88/1993 on Evaluation and Accreditation of Higher Education Institutions and Recognition of Diplomas • National Council for Academic Evaluation and Accreditation (CNEAA - NCAAA): 1993 - 2006 evaluation and accreditation of institutions and study programs • The Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) officially established by Government Emergency Ordinance No. 75 for Quality Assurance in Education of July 12th, 2005, modified and approved by Law 87/2006, Published in the Romanian Official Journal, Part I No. 334 of April 13th, 2006 – modified bygovernment emergency ordinance 75/2011 • ARACIS: Mission and objectives stated by Law ; also, ARACIS assumes and carries on the official rights and obligations of the former Romanian National Council for Academic Assessment and Accreditation (CNEAA) as well as its technical staff, archives and goods

  5. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) • Objectives - Quality assurance - develop and regularly review the national reference standards and the performance indicators, based on best practices, aiming to evaluate quality of higher education - cooperate with other national institutions involved in the development and promotion of policies and action strategies, aiming to increase the quality of education in Romania - organize yearly consultations with the higher education institutions to put forth the priorities in the field of quality assurance - develop its own procedures for the external quality evaluation and make them available to the public - perform external quality evaluation of programs and the providing institutions, national or foreign education establishments, as well as for the inter - institutional evaluation of similar programs, on contractual basis

  6. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Objectives - Quality assurance: - perform the quality evaluation in cases of certain programs and higher education establishments, upon request by the Ministry of Education, Research, Youth and Sports - publish the results of the external assessments - publish manuals, guidelines, papers summarizing the best practices in the quality assessment and assurance - develop regularly, every three years, system analyses on the quality of the higher education in Romania - cooperate with other similar foreign agencies in order to develop and implement effective measures to improve the quality of the higher education programs - develop the Code of Professional Ethics Code applicable to the ARACIS experts - publish yearly report on its own activity - develop reports aiming to assess its own operational quality, every three years, with a view to prepare itself for the external assessment by similar foreign agencies

  7. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Accreditation Two successive stages: a) provisional authorizing, as first step - gives the HEprovider the right to initiate and carry out the educational process and to organize, as the case may be, the admittance examinations; b) accreditation - grants the institution the right, along with the others rights provided under let. a), to issue diplomas, Ministry of Education, Research, Youth and Sports certificates and other official documents papers recognized by the Ministry of Education, Research, Youth and Sports and to organize, as the case may be, graduation examinations at Bachelor, Master and Doctorate level. Other tasks related to accreditation: a) develop on a regular basis the Methodology and the accreditation standards for different types of programs and HE providers, to be submitted to the Ministry of Education, Research, Youth and Sports and approved by the Government; b) to evaluate quality of higher education, based on the standards and Methodology, upon request or of its own motion, and to propose the authorization, respectively, the accreditation of the higher education providers and of their study domains and programs. Based on the ARACIS reports, the Ministry of Education, Research, Youth and Sports initiates the necessary legislative provisions for the establishment of higher education structures.

  8. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) • Status and Resources - autonomous institution, of national interest, a legal entity with its own income and expenditure budget - lead by a board of 17 members (15 academics and two students), with high academic and moral status, holding teaching positions in the higher education system. Every four years, the Council of ARACIS shall renew its composition by opening 10 positions to a new selection procedure. The members of the Council can sit for only two terms, 4 years each. Rectors and persons holding official positions with the Presidency, Government or Parliament cannot become or remain members of the Council of ARACIS.

  9. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Resources (human) - develops its own database of external evaluators, based on a transparent methodology (more than 1000 Romanian academic experts who passed on-line examination, students, foreign evaluators and representatives of the labor market) - consistency of evaluation: the Council set up 15 permanent specialty (subject) Commissions - permanent staff (35 – increase forseen)

  10. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Resources (facilities) • premises (rented) • furniture (purchased) • equipment (purchased) • one car

  11. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS)Independence • The Agency is independent of any political or other external influence • From the financial point of view, as stated by the Government Ordinance No 102/2006, ARACIS is funded as follows: a) fees collected for covering the costs of external evaluation for authorization/ accreditation/periodic evaluation of the higher education establishments and their study domains or programs; b)contracts for external evaluation of quality in higher education, concluded with third parties, as the Ministry of Education, Research, Youth and Sports; c) grants obtained through participation in international programs, donations, sponsorship activities, as well as other sources duly established.

  12. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Mission statement The mission statement of the Agency is specified in the Law 87/2006 In accordance with its mission and the legal provisions, ARACIS elaborated a Methodology for external evaluation, standards, standards of reference and list of performance indicators, which was approved by Government Decision No. 1418/2006in which the mission specified is fully stated. According to this “Methodology”, quality assurance in education makes reference to the following fields and criteria: A. Institutional capacity B. Educational effectiveness C. Quality management

  13. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) • The definition and operation of the procedures of the Agency are stated in the “Methodology” are detailed in the “Guide of the Activities of Quality Evaluation of University Study Programs and Higher Education Institutions” developed and approved by the Council of the agency: Part I -Authorization/accreditation of licence (bachelor) and master programs (Bologna “First” and “Second” cycles); Part II - External quality evaluation for accreditation at institutional level; Part III - External quality evaluation at institutional level at accredited institutions; Part IV – External evaluation of Departments for Teacher formation and training in HE institutions; Part V – External evaluation of departments and distance learning programs offered by universities.

  14. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) A NEW METHODOLOGY! (PROBABLY THIS MONTH) Because QA is a continuous process A new legal context ARACIS already realized a system analyze for Romanian HE system

  15. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) A new legal context • The law on quality assurance, law no. 87/2006, remains into force. The law establishes the general criteria for quality assurance: institutional capacity, educational effectiveness and quality management. • A new law on education has been passed; the law foresees a differentiation process among universities – there will be three non-hierarchical categories: education centred, education and research and respectively research intensive universities.

  16. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) A new legal context The law also foresees the multiplication of the evaluation processes and focuses: • Evaluation for the authorization/accreditation and periodical evaluation (every five years) of institutions, licence programmes, master domains and doctoral schools • Evaluation for the classification of universities and ranking of study programmes • The law also foresees a new financing methodology – the allocation of funds will be more competitive on the basis of the ranking of the study programmes.

  17. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) ARACIS finished the following evaluation activities: • - external evaluation of quality for 80 public and private accredited institutions • - external evaluation of a number of 2220 study programs, at the request of the interested institutions, in view of accreditation or periodic quality evaluation; • - external evaluation of a number of 2950 master programs, at the request of the interested institutions, in view of accreditation.

  18. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Strong points of the Methodology • Quality Barometers : high degree of consensus among the major stakeholders - academic staff and students as regards the appropriateness of these procedures • The Methodology has been recognized at European level (ARACIS - full member of ENQA in June, 2009 and listed in EQAR in September, 2009) • A large number of universities and study programs have been evaluated

  19. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Strong points of the Methodology ACADEMIS project: • opportunity to broaden the area of institutional evaluation by covering a large part of the higher education landscape • systematic data gathering on main stakeholders’ opinions and perceptions on quality; objective data on universities (benchmarking exercise); secondary analysis and reflection on the current methodology. • active participation of students in external institutional evaluation • framework for wide consultation with experts in universities in order to improve the existing methodology on an evidence and data based approach.

  20. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Weak points identified in the HE system • Low level of differentiation among universities with regard to mission, strategies and quality assurance procedures • High degree of homogeneity and institutional isomorphism in organisation but Objective reason: specialized universities (i.e. medical, military, technical etc.) are more homogeneous than comprehensive universities

  21. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Weak points identified in the HE system • High levels of formalism and ritualism in the internal quality assurance practices in institutions; the focus has been on drafting dossiers for accreditation and/or periodic evaluation • SERs of higher education institutions: are too "laudatory," instead of showing an understanding the concepts of QA and the activities themselves.

  22. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Weak points identified in the HE system • The internal quality assuranceis mostly a technical bureaucratic activity - not embedded in the day-to-day routines and practices of the universities or study programmes • The involvement of students - achieved in the external evaluation but to a much lesser degree in the internal quality assurance

  23. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Weak points identified in the HE system • The quality assurance practices have not been internalized - largely decoupled from the teaching/learning and research current activities in the universities • Internal quality cultures have not yet emerged, but rather countre-cultures blaming the excessive bureaucratization of academic activities. • Many higher education institutions do not demonstrate the effectiveness of their own internal quality assurance processes

  24. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) New approach to policy making • The ACADEMIS project has facilitated the collection and analysis of relevant objective and subjective data at systemic level. The policy making process now benefits from a broader range of experiences and evidence as regards quality assurance in Romanian higher education. • The elaboration of the new methodology is an evidence-based type of policy making involving numerous actors and stakeholders and will be the result of systematic reflection on the current methodology’s achievements and weaknesses.

  25. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Setting new QA principles • Shift of focus: from quality control or monitoring (external evaluation) to quality enhancement. • Balanced focus on the benchmarking approach andCompulsory normative minimal requirements(mostly for accreditation) and fitness-for-purpose approach (for periodical evaluation) • Benchmarking approach – meeting of threshold indicators’ level for accreditation purposes – inter-institutional comparisons – benchmarking will be a dynamic process based on the current performance of Romanian unis, but also observing European trends and benchmarks.

  26. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Setting new QA principles • Fitness for purpose – mainly a quality enhancement tool; universities and study programmes will be encouraged to gather systematic data and to set internal reference points – intra-institutional or intra-programme comparisons. Universities will be encouraged to reflect on the strenghts and weaknesses and to take remedial decisions on the basis of evidence.

  27. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Setting new QA principles • Accepted definitions - ENQA: • Fitness for purpose equates quality with the fulfilment of a specification or stated outcomes: Institutional choice between a range of indicators according the university mission and objectives • Fitness of purpose evaluates whether the quality-related intentions of an organisation are adequate. Increased weight and importance to the internal mechanisms for quality assurance Implementation of yearly internal quality assurance reports of the study programmes/institutions

  28. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) Setting new QA principles • Balanced set of indicators focusing mostly on processes (internal management of quality at all levels, study programmes, faculties, institution) and outputs (learning outcomes, scientific production), but also inputs (staffing, teaching/learning environment) • Periodical evaluation will be mostly focused on the audit of the internal quality system (process) and quality enhancement. The institutions will be thus encouraged to assume full responsibility for assuring quality and also to involve stakeholders so as to assure the validity of their study programmes.

  29. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) NEW METHODOLOGY FOR QA • The European Standards and Guidelines • Multi-stage procedure: internal evaluation followed by external evaluation and decision making – it has already been successfully established and will be maintained. • Important focus on internal evaluation • Bottom-up approach in setting indicators and procedures at institutional level. • Quality indicators in-built form within the programme and more focused on student learning experiences.

  30. Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ARACIS) NEW METHODOLOGY FOR QA • An inclusive and evidence based process of defining the list and threshold level of indicators for accreditation of different types of universities and study programmes. • Quality is a contextual and cultural concept: there can be various ‘qualities’ • Diversity will be assumed and encouraged: not just one path to quality assurance - institution specific paths encouraged • Involvement of stakeholders will be stimulated

More Related