130 likes | 157 Views
Team 5 Design Concept Selection. Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White. Outline. Concept Elimination Summary of Chosen Concept Strengths and Issues Variations. Concept 1 -- Eliminated.
E N D
Team 5Design Concept Selection Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White
Outline • Concept Elimination • Summary of Chosen Concept • Strengths and Issues • Variations AAE 451 – Team 5
Concept 1 -- Eliminated • Aft CG • Yaw Control • Canard Control AAE 451 – Team 5
Concept 3 -- Eliminated • Lack of customer interest • Lack of visual appeal • Structural Rigidity AAE 451 – Team 5
Concept 2 -- Selected • Twin-boom pusher prop • Double angled tail • Conventional landing gear • Diamond Wing AAE 451 – Team 5
Aerodynamics • Strengths • Propeller will improve separation issues • Wing area provides greater lift • Issues • Low Reynolds number (~191000) • Low AR (~3) AAE 451 – Team 5
Structure • Strengths • Carbon fiber rods • Shorter fuselage • Issues • Bending moment • Tail-Strike Protection • Landing Gear AAE 451 – Team 5
Dynamics & Control • Advantages • Easy to analyze and adjust • Two axis control on tail • Potential Issues • CG Near Engine (Aft of AC) • Lifting tail may be necessary • Moment caused from raised engine AAE 451 – Team 5
Propulsion • Advantages • More air over the tail • Issues • Propeller size • Pusher • “Dirty” Air aft of wing AAE 451 – Team 5
Manufacturability • Strengths • CNC machine adaptability • Large Continuous sections • Booms are simple • Issues • Blending the body and the wing • Resource limitations AAE 451 – Team 5
Possible Variations • Tractor • Straight Vertical Tail • Single Boom / Fuselage • W-tail AAE 451 – Team 5
Possible Variations • Anhedral Wing • Tail Dragger • Larger/Wider fuselage AAE 451 – Team 5
Future Work • Iterate Sizes • Weight Guessing • Performance Criteria AAE 451 – Team 5