1 / 35

EMERGENCE OF ASYMMETRY IN EVOLUTION

EMERGENCE OF ASYMMETRY IN EVOLUTION. PÉTER VÁRKONYI . BME, BUDAPEST. IN COOPERATION WITH. GÁBOR DOMOKOS . BME, BUDAPEST. GÉZA MESZÉNA . ELTE, BUDAPEST. C. A. B. evolutionary time. evolutionary time. evolutionary time. x. x. x. symmetrical form. symmetrical form.

ekram
Download Presentation

EMERGENCE OF ASYMMETRY IN EVOLUTION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EMERGENCE OF ASYMMETRY IN EVOLUTION PÉTER VÁRKONYI BME, BUDAPEST IN COOPERATION WITH GÁBOR DOMOKOS BME, BUDAPEST GÉZA MESZÉNA ELTE, BUDAPEST

  2. C A B evolutionary time evolutionary time evolutionary time x x x symmetrical form symmetrical form symmetrical form EMERGENCE OF ASYMMETRY definition of symmetry time-dependent model

  3. I. TWO KINDS OF SYMMETRY IN ADAPTIVE DYNAMICS - simple reflection symmetry - „special” symmetry II. A TIME-DEPENDENT VERSION OF THE MODEL III. BRANCHING IN THE TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL - without symmetry - with reflection symmetry - with „special” symmetry IV. AN EXAMPLE

  4. x0 is symmetrical strategy if for arbitrary x and y x (slope of the spiral) x0-x x0=0 x0+x x0 x0 I. SYMMETRY IN ADAPTIVE DYNAMICS EXAMPLES IN LITERATURE: Geritz, S. A. H., Kisdi É., Meszéna G., Metz., J. A. J.: Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12:35-57. (1998) Meszéna G., Geritz S.A.H., Czibula I.: Adaptive dynamics in a 2-patch environment: asimple model for allopatric and parapatric speciation. J. of Biological Systems Vol. 5, No. 2 265-284. (1997)

  5. x (slope of the spiral) x0-x x0=0 x0+x I. SYMMETRY IN ADAPTIVE DYNAMICS x0 is symmetrical strategy if for arbitrary x and y x0 x0 • a symmetrical strategy is always singular • all the 8 typical configurations may appear

  6. x0 is special symmetrical strategy if for arbitrary x and y x0 x0 • a special symmetrical strategy • is always singular • there are two typical configurations I. A MORE SPECIAL SYMMETRY IN ADAPTIVE DYNAMICS If x0 is a symmetrical strategy, the asymmetrical individuals and their reflections are often completely equivalent.

  7. assumption: change of the model is slow, compared to evolution: evolutionary equilibrium in quasi-permanent model 3 separate time-scales: * - population dynamics (fast) * t - evolution (slower) * T- environmental change (slowest) problem is reduced to analysis of non time-dependent model at different values of a (T) parameter II. TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL T )

  8. at T=0: * x0 is a CSS and ESS singular strategy * population of x0 strategists in evolutionary equilibrium slow evolution later: * x0(T) slowly changes * a10(T) and a01(T) slowly change III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL (WITHOUT SYMMETRY)

  9. at T=0: * x0 is a CSS and ESS singular strategy * population of x0 strategists in evolutionary equilibrium a10 later: * x0(T) slowly changes * a10(T) and a01(T) slowly change T=0 a01 III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL (WITHOUT SYMMETRY)

  10. at T=0: * x0 is a CSS and ESS singular strategy * population of x0 strategists in evolutionary equilibrium later: * x0(T) slowly changes * a10(T) and a01(T) slowly change CSS 2 non-CSS 3 1 a01 ESS non-ESS III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL (WITHOUT SYMMETRY) a10

  11. CSS 2 non-CSS 3 1 a01 ESS non-ESS III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL (WITHOUT SYMMETRY) 1: the singular strategy becomes non-ESS T a10 t x x0

  12. CSS 2 non-CSS 3 1 a01 ESS non-ESS III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL (WITHOUT SYMMETRY) 2: T a10 t x x0

  13. CSS 2 non-CSS 3 1 a01 ESS non-ESS III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL (WITHOUT SYMMETRY) 3: the singular strategy becomes degenerate a10 this is atypical

  14. at T=0: * x0 is a CSS and ESS symmetrical strategy * population of x0 strategists in equilibrium T T t t A B x x0 x x0 III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH REFLECTION SYMMETRY

  15. at T=0: * x0 is a CSS and ESS special symmetrical strategy * population of x0 strategists in equilibrium later: * x0 does not change * a00 changes slowly a00 T=0 III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH SPECIAL SYMMETRY

  16. III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH SPECIAL SYMMETRY at T=0: * x0 is a convergence stable and ESS special symmetrical strategy * population of x0 strategists in equilibrium later: * x0 does not change * a00 changes slowly 1 a00

  17. the m size of mutational steps is small but not infinitely small there is a time-interval when |a00|<<m2 The model behaves as in the case of a00=0; the character of the singular strategy is determined by higher order terms. III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH SPECIAL SYMMETRY 1: the singular strategy becomes non-ESS and non-CSS 1 a00

  18. a10 CSS non-CSS if a000 a01 ESS non-ESS III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH SPECIAL SYMMETRY 1: the singular strategy becomes non-ESS and non-CSS 1 a00

  19. T a00<0 a000 t a00>0 x x0 A III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH SPECIAL SYMMETRY a10 CSS non-CSS a01 ESS non-ESS

  20. III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH SPECIAL SYMMETRY T a10 a00<0 CSS t non-CSS a000 a01 ESS non-ESS a00>0 x x0 A

  21. III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH SPECIAL SYMMETRY T a10 a00<0 CSS non-CSS a000 a01 ? ESS t non-ESS a00>0 x x0

  22. s(y) 4th order x0 y s(y) x0 y s(y) x0 y III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH SPECIAL SYMMETRY a10 CSS non-CSS a01 ESS non-ESS

  23. III. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH SPECIAL SYMMETRY T a10 a00<0 CSS non-CSS a000 a01 ESS t non-ESS a00>0 x x0 C

  24. * x0=0 is a special symmetrical strategy * 2 patches with capacities c1, c-c1 with optimal strategies 0 and 1 * resident population: * the number of the offspring is proportional to the frequency of the given strategy; the offspring is randomly distributed in the patches * the chance of the xj strategists surviving the 1st period in the ith patch is proportional to fi(xj) * in the 2nd period, the living space in the patches is allocated randomly among survivors. IV. AN EXAMPLE Geritz, S. A. H., Kisdi É., Meszéna G., Metz., J. A. J.: Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12:35-57. (1998)

  25. x x -1 1 y 1 + + + + + 0 + -1 x -1 0 1 c1/c=0,5 c1/c=0,6 c1/c=0,4 AN EXAMPLE IV. AN EXAMPLE

  26. x 1 0,953 0,643 T CSS, ESS c1/c non CSS, non ESS 0,355 0,5 0,858 1 CSS, non ESS CSS, ESS coalitions AN EXAMPLE IV. AN EXAMPLE y 1 + + + + + 0 + -1 x -1 0 1 c1/c=0,5 c1/c=0,6 c1/c=0,4

  27. x 1 0,643 T CSS, ESS c1/c non CSS, non ESS 0,5 0,858 1 CSS, non ESS t Time-dependent model produces branching where asymmetrical mutants spread, but symmetrical strategists also survive c1/c=0,5 0,953 x AN EXAMPLE IV. AN EXAMPLE 0,953 0,355 CSS, ESS coalitions

  28. A B C T T T x x x occurs at symmetrical strategies occurs at special symmetrical strategies SUMMARY * two classes of symmetrical strategies * in slowly changing environment Can we observe this kind of branching in Nature ?

  29. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH REFLECTION SYMMETRY at t=0: * x0 is a convergence stable and ESS symmetrical strategy * population of x0 strategists in equilibrium later: * x0 does not change * a10 and a01 slowly change

  30. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH REFLECTION SYMMETRY at t=0: * x0 is a convergence stable and ESS singular strategy * population of x0 strategists in equilibrium a10 CS later: * x0 does not change * a10 and a01 slowly change non-CS 2 4 1 a01 ESS non-ESS 3

  31. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH REFLECTION SYMMETRY 1: the singular strategy becomes non-ESS a10 CS non-CS 2 evolutionary time 4 1 a01 ESS non-ESS 3 x x0

  32. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH REFLECTION SYMMETRY 2: the singular strategy becomes non-CS a10 CS non-CS 2 evolutionary time 4 1 a01 ESS non-ESS 3 x0 x

  33. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH REFLECTION SYMMETRY 3: the (non-CS) singular strategy becomes non-ESS a10 CS CS non-CS non-CS 2 evolutionary time 4 1 a01 ESS non-ESS 3 x x0

  34. BRANCHING IN TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL WITH REFLECTION SYMMETRY 4: the singular strategy becomes degenerate a10 this is atypical CS non-CS 2 4 1 a01 ESS non-ESS 3

More Related