1 / 12

New Zealand-led Drafting team

Example: MC for verifying the performance of a food safety control system. New Zealand-led Drafting team. Drafting Team. Costa Rica Kenya Kiribati New Zealand Samoa. Organism of concern. Campylobacter spp. Point in food chain – food/food process.

elan
Download Presentation

New Zealand-led Drafting team

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Example: MC for verifying the performance of a food safety control system New Zealand-led Drafting team

  2. Drafting Team Costa Rica Kenya Kiribati New Zealand Samoa

  3. Organism of concern Campylobacter spp

  4. Point in food chain – food/food process Food: fresh raw broiler chicken carcasses Point of food chain: after slaughter, dressing and initial chilling to check status at the end of primary processing

  5. Purpose Purpose: to verify whether a food safety control system applied to the slaughter and dressing of broiler chicken achieves a regulated performance target for Campylobacter

  6. Who should establish/who should apply Established: by regulator in consultation with industry Applied: by processors of broiler chickens. GHP and hazard-based measures are selected by individual processors that best meet the target.

  7. Sampling plan 3 samples to be taken each processing day 5 processing days = 15 samples = 1 processing period 3 processing periods = window So: n = 45 samples in window m = limit of 3.78 log10 colony forming units/carcass (90th percentile of target distribution curve) c = 6 (max. number of results that can be above m)

  8. Method of analysis Method of analysis: direct plate enumeration (mCCDA)

  9. Interpretation of results – Moving Window n= 45 samples in window m = 3.78 log10 cfu/carcass c = 6 (max. number that can be above m)

  10. Example – Moving Window 2 c = 6

  11. Example – Moving Window 3 c = 6 Action!

  12. Actions in case of non-compliance Escalating Response • GHP and HACCP review • Processing Equip WOF, Farm review • Sampling, + interventions • Regulatory visit +/- sanctions • Sanctions

More Related