1 / 15

Research Ethics

Research Ethics. PPAL 6200-3.0 7-8 February, 2012. Introduction. Why? Regulatory Framework Administration of the Framework here at York Practical Advice. Why? The University Setting. Academic Freedom comes with Social Responsibility

elana
Download Presentation

Research Ethics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research Ethics PPAL 6200-3.0 7-8February, 2012

  2. Introduction • Why? • Regulatory Framework • Administration of the Framework here at York • Practical Advice

  3. Why? The University Setting • Academic Freedom comes with Social Responsibility • Academic Freedom does not mean freedom from Peer Review • Ethics Review can improve Research Design

  4. Why? The Public Service Setting • The Charter of Rights and Freedoms • Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Legislation • Obligations arising out of Common Law • The Court of Public Opinion

  5. Basic Regulatory Framework in Canadian Research • Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, December 2010(TCPS2).

  6. What does TCPS2 Apply To • All researchers and research conducted in an academic setting in Canada involving human subjects • Most research otherwise funded by the federal government involving human subjects is regulated by rules largely based on the TCPS regime • Most research otherwise regulated by the federal government involving human subjects is regulated by rules largely based on the TCPS regime (see Sec 9.25 of Canada’s Research Based Pharmaceutical Companies 2010 Code of Ethics)

  7. Basic Principles of Ethical Research:Respect for Human Dignity • Respect for Persons • Autonomy and Informed Consent • Concern for Welfare • Protection of research subjects and in some research Promotion of their wellbeing • Protecting the wellbeing of communities and society as a whole • Justice • Treating people fairly and equitably • Recruitment process issues • Power imbalance between researchers and subjects

  8. Administration of the Framework @ York • TCPS2 Requires each institution that receives Tri-Council Funding (like York) to create a body which will: • review proposed research projects, • supervise on-going ones • and generally ensure compliance with the policy • Generically these bodies are called Research Ethics Boards or REBs. Additionally, REBs often take on other functions as well (such as advising on policy and training). • Here at York the REB is called Human Participants Review Sub-Committee [of Senate] or HPRC

  9. Basic Operating Principles of Any REB in Canada • Administer the policy at arms-length from university administration • Predominantly academics on the REB with community membership as well • Proportionate Review: Research that poses greater risks to the subject ought to receive more thorough review and more careful monitoring • Minimal Risk Threshold: Applications screened to determine if cross this threshold: Does the proposed research pose no greater risk to participant than what they would face in their daily life. • If cannot say Yes to this question, the research is NOT minimal risk. • Confidentiality and right of appeal

  10. Senate Policy: Ethics Review Process for Research Involving Human Participants Policy • Human Participants Review Sub-Committee (HPRC) which ensures review and supervision for all research involving human subjects • Office of Research Ethics (ORE) which administratively assists the committee • Delegation of supervision for student projects involving minimal risk. • As a graduate student you have a separate process to apply for permission that begins with your MRP supervisor (Who must sign off on your proposal) and the Research Committee in SPPA • If the Research Committee deems your project to be minimal-risk they have the authority to approve it on behalf of the HPRC.

  11. Practical Advice • You can find the forms you need by clicking on the link marked “Guidelines, Policies and Forms” on the MPPAL Website. • Using an informed consent document signed by each participant is the norm. • If you deviate from this you need a good reason. • Anonymity of research participants is the norm. • If you deviate from this you will definitely need a signed consent form where participants acknowledge they will be named in the research • The “its their job” guideline • The “I got this info through my job” warning • If you do not know, ASK!

  12. The Difference between a Guideline and a Regulation images from web

  13. The policies governing Research Ethics are Regulations not Guidelines • Violations of the policies governing research ethics are dealt with very harshly by both York and our funder/regulators in Ottawa. • Punishments for even first offences can be serious. photo from CTV NEWS (images.ctv.ca)

  14. Worse… • Depending on the offence you may also face repercussions from your employer video from Youtube

  15. But there is really no reason to run afoul of these policies as the rules are pretty obvious and straightforward. • Compliance does however take a bit of time, thought and planning. • It is well worth the effort.

More Related