120 likes | 306 Views
AHI. Avian and Human Influenza Pandemic Preparedness. Pandemic Preparedness for the Humanitarian Community With the Pandemic Influenza Contingency (PIC) Support Team. Rome, June 28, 2007. Framework. Framework. Challenges. Approach. Implementation. Planning Framework – 4 Objectives. 1.
E N D
AHI Avian and Human Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Pandemic Preparedness for the Humanitarian Community With the Pandemic Influenza Contingency (PIC) Support Team Rome, June 28, 2007
Framework Framework Challenges Approach Implementation Planning Framework – 4 Objectives 1 A B Staff Health and Safety Business Continuity Implement measures that may minimize impact on Staff health and safety Maintain operational continuity (programme and infrastructure) C D New Services New Programmes Contribute to a system-wide effort to prepare for, prevent and combat AHI Identify and address food security needs of possible new beneficiary caseloads
Framework Challenges Challenges Approach Implementation Possible Pandemic Timeline ~ 2-3 weeks ~ 12-18 months 3 4 5 6 1 Prep. Mode Crisis Mode Crisis Mode Crisis Mode Lockdown Mode Lockdown Mode ~ 4-6 weeks ~ 4-6 weeks Key planning considerations • Time-scale – not a single event!! • Long term norms change • Tested / resilient systems
Framework Challenges Challenges Approach Implementation Market Disruptions 1 1 • Market Changes: • Commodities, Services, Staff, Fuel • Supply & demand will be affected (therefore Price) • Imposed restrictions (borders, freedom of movement, protectionism) • Increase in demand for humanitarian logistics services: • Increased complexity of supplying existing humanitarian crises • New Humanitarian crises • Geographic spread of the needs Logistics Challenges 2 2 Sea (shipping, port operations) Surface (road, train, borders crossings) Air transport (cargo, humanitarian workers, evacuation) Storage
Approach Framework Challenges Approach Implementation Prioritization 1 1 Partnerships 2 2 3 3 Planning
Approach Framework Challenges Approach Implementation Prioritization 1 1 • Using MapleCroft approach • Based on FAO, WHO, WB, OiE data • Hardship classification done by ICSC (International Civil Service Commission)
Approach Framework Challenges Approach Implementation Prioritization 1 1
Approach Framework Challenges Approach Implementation Prioritization 1 1
Approach Framework Challenges Approach Implementation Partnerships 2 2 • Humanitarian Partners: • To anticipate needs & capacities • To understand and manage expectations • Private Sector: • To understand their BCP • To build strategic partnerships • Civil and Military: • To understand their role in quarantine enforcement • To anticipate use of Military & Civil Defense assets (nat’l & internat’l) • Partners in Pandemic Preparedness: • UNSIC, PICs, participating Agencies and Donors • to ensure the Log’s CONOPS is in support to the overarching objectives of the UN System
Approach Framework Challenges Approach Implementation In order to support National Preparedness and Response Minimize a pandemic’s impact onStaff Health & Safety In order to maintain and sustain Operation capacity 3 3 Planning • Common objectives • Common planning standard => Based on similar guidelines => Global contingency planning effort • Anchored on UNCT paradigm => Inter-Agency => Country-specific
Implementation The Threat Preparedness Prioritization Logistics Next Steps – Implementation plans Share: • planning assumptions • baseline data Engage and test: • Ensure engagement of all stakeholders • Consolidate a civil society ownership • Test assumptions and plans • Develop protocols (SOPs) Aim for: • Multi-sectorial joint operation response • Robustness and flexibility • Reinforced resilience of the systems A B C
AHI Avian and Human Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Pandemic Preparedness for the Humanitarian Community With the Pandemic Influenza Contingency (PIC) Support Team Rome, June 28, 2007