210 likes | 223 Views
This information release discusses the consideration of daughter products in a facility's radioactive material inventory. It presents an approach to address the potential impacts and evaluates the impact of daughter products on hazard categorization and inventory tracking. The evaluation includes determining isotopes of concern, evaluating decay chains, and comparing daughter products to their parents.
E N D
Addressing Daughter Products as Part of a Facility’s Inventory Nathan Cathey EFCOG Safety Analysis Work Shop Santa Fe, New Mexico May 6, 2012 Information Release – PNNL-SA-87527
Addressing Daughter Products as Part of a Facility’s Inventory • Why consider in-growth of daughter products? • Some daughter products have higher DOE-STD-1027 Threshold Quantities (TQ) or ICRP-71 dose conversions factors than their parents • This can impact • Hazard Categorization - comparison to TQ • Comparison to facility’s limits placed on inventory to maintain dose consequences within analyzed values • Describe an approach to address potential impacts from daughter products as part of a facility’s radioactive material inventory. • The isotopes of concern are identified, • The method of evaluating the decay chains, and • Factors comparing the daughter products to their parents are presented
Overview – Types of Material at PNNL Facilities (cont.) • PNNL has several radiological facilities and one Hazard Category 2 facility • PNNL uses a wide variety of materials in performing various research activities. • Isotopes run the gamut • Medical • Spent fuel • National Security • Waste stream treatment studies
Overview – Types of Material at PNNL Facilities (cont.) • Thousands of sealed sources and samples of radioactive materials are in use at PNNL • Some radioactive materials are kept for decades • Inventory of isotopes within in given source or sample will change over time which could potentially impact comparison of material to • Hazard Category threshold quantities (HC-3 TQs) • Radioactive material inventory limits
Method of Evaluation • Initial effort performed in 2005 • Purpose was to determine impact on HC-3 TQs • Work expanded to look at impact on Inventory Tracking at PNNL Hazard Category 2 facility in 2012 • Overview of Method • Determine isotopes of interest • Evaluated selected isotopes for various time periods (from weeks to up to 100 years) • Determine impact on HC-3 TQs • Determine impact on inventory tracking
Evaluation of Potential HC-3 TQ Impact • Initial work • 816 isotopes • First five daughters • Estimated parent and daughters’ activities for time at maximum activity or 100 years • Compared to HC-3 TQs then extended to HC-2 TQs • Excel Spreadsheet used to perform screening analysis
Evaluation of Potential HC-3 TQ Impact (cont.) • Screening narrowed consideration to 42 isotopes for evaluation • Some decay schemes can be complicated and require analysis via computer code.
Evaluation of Potential HC-3 TQ Impact (cont.) 226 Ra decay Radiological Health Handbook, US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, January 1970
Evaluation of Potential HC-3 TQ Impact (cont.) • Three primary methods were used to determine the activity of the parent and daughters at different decay times • Determine decay with ORIGEN-S code (within the SCALE software package) (ORNL) • Determine activity based on derived equations (isotopes with one or two daughters) • Zr-88, Pm-144, Eu-147, Gd-146, Lu-174m, and Pt-188 • Combined approach for longer decay chains that were not in ORIGEN-S, • Pa-230, Cm-240, and Cf-248 • Determine and evaluate first daughter product in ORIGIN-S • Calculate parent and first daughter analytically
Evaluation of Potential HC-3 TQ Impact (cont.) • Decay Times (Years) Examined based on Isotope Type • Light Element 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 1, 3, 10, 30, 100 • Actinide 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 10, 30, 100 • All analysis started with 1 Ci of parent
Sum of Fraction for HC-3 TQs • For isotopes with one or two daughters or that the parent is in ORIGIN-S • Parent activity divided by HC-3 TQ • Daughter activity divided by HC-3 TQ • Summed for each time point • For isotopes with longer decay chains not in ORIGIN-S • Determine adjusted HC-3 TQ for first daughter • Sum of Fraction for decay chain • Parent activity divided by HC-3 TQ • First daughter activity divided by adjusted HC-3 TQ
Sum of Fraction for HC-3 TQs (cont.) • New HC-3 TQ was reciprocal of the maximum Sum of Fractions • Some reached their maximum in the first 2-3 weeks • Others continued to grow through 100 years. • HC-3 TQ unaffected for 28 of the 40 isotopes evaluated. • Fourteen isotopes that would impact HC-3 TQs • Ac-227, Gd-146, In-114m, Pa-231, Pt-188, Pu-241, Ra-223, Ra-225, Ra-226, Th-234, U-232, U-233, U-234, and Zr-88. • Established administrative thresholds in PNNLs Radioactive Material Tracking (RMT) system to account for daughter product in-growth
Impact on Inventory tracking at 325 Building • PNNL operates one Hazard Category 2 facility: 325 Building – Radiochemical Processing Laboratory (RPL) • Dose Consequences and TSR Inventory Limit based on “Equivalent Curies” • Pu-239 Equivalent (Pu-239E) for particulates • H-3 Equivalent (H-3E) for gases • Approach similar to that of HC-3 TQ • Evaluated same 40 isotopes based on earlier work • Tracked particulates and gas (e.g., Rn-222) separately. • Pu-239E and H-3E conversion factors based on : • ICRP-71 dose conversion factors • Considered inhalation, groundshine, and submersion • Conversion factors are divisors
Equivalent Dose For Each Decay Chain • For isotopes with one or two daughters or the parent is in ORIGIN-S • Parent divided by Dose Conversion Factor (DCF) • Daughter activity divided by DCF • Summed for each time point • For isotopes with longer decay chains not in ORIGIN-S • Determine adjusted DCF for first daughter • Parent divided by DCF • Daughter activity divided by adjusted DCF • Summed for each time point
Equivalent Dose For Each Decay Chain (cont.) • Impact on H-3 E • Maximum Quantity from daughter ingrowth is approximately 2 CiH-3 E • Five orders of magnitude less than they RPL TSR limit for H-3 E • Not analyzed further • Fifteen nuclides have adjusted Pu-239 E conversion factors greater than the parents alone. • Values for Gd-146 and Pt-188 not calculated since these isotopes are not presently at PNNL.
Impacts of Equivalent Dose Evaluations • How does this impact the RPL inventory in RMT? • Using the adjusted Pu-239E CF would • Increase the Pu-239E by < 10 % (includes “double counting” any parent –daughter inventory entries) • Increase the Pu-239E by ~ 6 % (accounting for top parent –daughter inventory entries) • Options considered addressing the in-growth of daughters • Have user enter daughter product activity at specified times • Revised RMT to periodically calculate parent and daughter activities • Revise RMT to use adjusted DCF to report Pu-239E inventory • Monitor impact through periodic assessments
Recommendations for Equivalent Dose Impacts • Recommend that DCFs in RMT not be changed at this time • Monitor impact through periodic assessments • Basis of Recommendation; • Quantities of applicable isotopes are generally small • Doesn’t introduce new requirements on users or complicated routines in RMT • Current inventory is ~ 18% of TSR LCO limit • TSR LCO OPERATING LIMT is 10% less than that analyzed in DSA • RPL Control Range is 10% less than the TSR LCO OPERATING LIMIT
Summary • Hazard Category 3 Threshold Quantities • Fourteen nuclides have adjusted HC-3 TQs greater than the parents alone: • Ac-227, Gd-146, In-114m, Pa-231, Pt-188, Pu-241, Ra-223, Ra-225, Ra-226, Th-234, U-232, U-233, U-234, and Zr-88. • Results have been integrated into PNNLs Radioactive Material Tracking system • Radioactive Material Inventory • Fifteen nuclides have adjusted Pu-239E conversion factors greater than the parents alone: • Ac-227, Bk-249, Cf-253, Gd-146, In-114m, Pa-231, Pt-188, Pu-241, Ra-223, Ra-225, Ra-226, Th-234, U-232, U-233,, and Zr-88 • Impact will be monitored through periodic assessment