1 / 19

OR in the Third Sector

This case study explores applying a strategic consultancy framework for nonprofit organizations in the Third Sector to enhance capacity building, transparency, and focus on outcomes. It delves into participatory approaches, value addition, and achieving impactful results through a systematic process.

elidab
Download Presentation

OR in the Third Sector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. OR in the Third Sector Pro Bono Case Studies Huw Evans

  2. Background • Police • Audit Commission • Independent consultant • Developing volunteering roles • Doctorate - developed an evaluative framework for approaches to and processes for public engagement • Community OR (COR) & OR in the Third Sector(ORiTS)

  3. Context • Connected via The Cranfield Trust and REACH • http://www.cranfieldtrust.org • http://www.reachskills.org.uk • Community OR & ORiTS • Capacity building • Participatory approaches • Adding value

  4. Developing the assignments • The link agency provided a project specification and expectations, e.g. time input required • Expenses paid ….. • The work was open to further interpretation and design in consultation with the client

  5. Values • Open, transparent • Capacity building • Expectations • their problems remained their property • did they want to change? • Whole systems approach • Develop self-awareness • Outcome focus • Learning • Action orientated • Adding value

  6. Scope • Strategic planning • Identifying outcomes • Gap analysis • Risk analysis • Clarifying my role • Capacity building • Making tacit knowledge explicit • Participatory approaches • Open, transparent, undermining ‘P’(‘p’)olitical agendas • Flexible / responsive approach to the assignment

  7. Case Studies Four charities • 3 are small organisations • 2 are trying to cope with funding cuts • 1 planning a big project to refurbish an iconic building and enter into partnership with another charity • 1 a regional wide agenda around literature coping with recent amalgamation/absorption of other organisations • 1 with an espoused world wide conservancy agenda • 1 with a youth and community agenda • 1 with an advocacy role for minority groups

  8. Theoretical domains • Complexity Theory • Groups • Systems Theory • Learning Organisations • Organisational Learning • Human Inquiry • Group Dynamics • Critical Systems Theory • Democratic Theory • Action research, participatory action research, self-reliant participatory action research

  9. Common themes • Consultancy seen as too expensive • Lack of common understanding about the priorities • Managers & directors working in isolation – knowledge remained tacit • Failure to draw upon the breadth and depth of human capital available • ‘P’(‘p’)olitical’ agenda • Time • Weak approach to development and capacity building • Weak outcome and user focus

  10. Blast & Prioritise workshop • Set a theme • Process • KISS principle • Blast - What works well? • Blast - What doesn’t work so well? • Group the issues and then prioritise them • Output • Develop and agree an action plan – inc risks • Requires some iteration • Outcomes • Self aware with a plan - refocused • Openness, transparency, undermines closed/political agendas, tacit knowledge made more explicit

  11. Open Space with Future Search • Using an Open Space approach • Empowers anyone to contribute • Individual responsibility • Owen, H. (1997). Open Space Technology (A User's Guide). San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler • Future Search timeline • Past, present, future • Individual, world, organisational perspective • Share information • Makes explicit peoples’ vision for the future • Weisbord, M. R. and S. Janoff (1995). Future Search - An Action Guide to Finding Common Ground in Organizations & Communities. San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler

  12. Case Study - 1 • Small agency – advocacy for BME groups • Funding had collapsed and were reduced to 1 member of staff • Unclear agenda, unrealistic expectations & confused priorities by the board • Developed a risk assessed action plan • Workshop with the recently redundant staff, manager and board

  13. Case Study 2 • World wide conservancy agenda with a zoological exhibition • Open Space adapted with the Future Search ‘timeline’ with managers, staff, trustees revealed: • Lack of common understanding • Poor structure • Problematic governance • Further workshop with trustees • Mindsets challenged – new ideas emerged • Confidence boosted

  14. Case Study 3 • Young people and wider community support agenda • Refurbishment of iconic premises plus partnership arrangement with an arts charity to share the new building • Coaching and mentoring the manager • Blast & prioritise workshop plus survey of users • New draft plan • More work emerging – this time for payment!

  15. Case Study 4 • Regional literary organisation • Recently merged with 2 other organisations • Heavily reliant upon a single funder • Wanted a new business plan • Resistant to a whole system approach • Blast & prioritise workshop with staff and managers • Workshop with the business planning sub-group of the Board • Satisfaction with vision, mission, values? • Blast & prioritise • Survey of stakeholders • Several hundred potential but circulated to 7 of whom four responded • The organisation then felt they were in a better position to write their new plan

  16. Theoretical domains

  17. How was it for me? • Interesting, fun, met new people and worked in new areas& I learned a lot • Issues about power, ego, status • Small interventions can make a difference • The approach adopted often exposed the ‘elephant in the room’ • Strategy and operational delivery are inextricably linked in well managed organisations • Confusion about separating ‘governance’ and ‘management’ from service development • Organisations can make more use of the breadth and depth of the human capital available • Risk management is seen as an adjunct to planning and not integral to it • 3rd Sector infrastructure organisations may not be meeting the needs of the sector • Pro bono work is not ‘free’ • Working via other organisations may not raise the profile of OR or the ORS • Boosts your experience and CV

  18. How was it for the client? • Added value • Knowledge management • Learning • People enjoyed being involved • More self-aware about challenges, priorities • New ideas emerged • Boosted capacity and confidence • “Failing to plan is planning to fail” (This, or variations, attributed to Benjamin Franklin, Winston Churchill et al)

  19. Contact Dr Huw Evans Independent consultant T/A HSE Organisational Development Tel: 07595 419938 Email: huwdevans@gmail.com Twitter: @wildkippers Linked in: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/huwdevans

More Related