220 likes | 235 Views
Promoting reading courses & literacy, enhancing student experiences, implementing reading workshops & professional development. Advancing student reading across campuses with partnerships & diverse strategies.
E N D
Read for LIFE Learning Information Fulfillment Entertainment
Read for LIFE GOAL #1: Strengthen students’ experience in reading courses GOAL #3: Advance reading across curricula and campuses GOAL #2: Promote BCTC Literacy
GOAL #1: Strengthen students’ experience in reading courses • Reading tutor and contact for Compass Reading Refresher • Professional development for reading faculty • ShareFests – over 20 meetings in the last 4 years • Reading workshops • E-community • National Conferences • Course improvements • Course offerings – RDG 20, IRW 95 • Co-requisites - RDG 30/BIO 120, HIS 109, COM 252 • RDG 20 book project – ND shows average improvement of 2.04 to 2.63 • Assessment of reading classes • Nelson Denny – average improvement of reading courses has increased from Fall 2009 (1.74) to Spring 2012 (5.66) • Developmental reading advising • Implemented RDG 20 advising • Mandatory placement compliance has increased (Fall 2006 38% - Fall 2013 80%) • Reading liaisons • communication with gen ed and technical faculty about reading expectations in the classroom • Created a “textbook” with sample chapters from various disciplines across campus to us in our RDG 185
GOAL #2: Promote BCTC Literacy • BCTC terms and processes • Terms like: SAP, hybrid, GPA, AA/AS, SGA, academic ombud • Processes like: how to change a major, what to do when you have a problem with an instructor • Incorporated BCTC terms in RDG 185/GEN 102/FYE 105 • Survey students every Spring Fling • Part of the developmental reading advising • Promotion of BCTC Literacy across campuses with PR/marketing – • Are you in the know? Read for LIFE Homepage
GOAL #3: Advance student reading across curricula and campuses. • Over 145 reading-focused professional development offerings • On-line professional development • Cross-trained reading/writing tutors • Reading Tutor – 119 hours this semester • 14 reading partnerships
Goal #3 Reading Partnerships • Electronics – Kevin Jenson • Math – Ruth Simms • Biology – Becky McCane • Communications – Stacy Webster-Little • Machine Tool Technology – Danny Roberts • Carpentry – Laura Lynch • Art – Chris Huestis • English 101 – Kathy Swango • Medical Information Technology – Tammie Disco-Boggs • Biotech – Tammy Liles • English 102 – Leif Rigney • History – Karen Gauthier • Financial Aid – Michael Birchett • CIT 105 – Paul Sirimongkhon • FYE 105 – Laura Williams • Nursing – Evelyn Grigsby
Reading in Math Lack of background knowledge Lack of vocabulary Notation heavy Content packed Unable to monitor understanding Unfamiliar text structure Unwilling to “take the time”
Math Comprehension • Locate key information • Organize information • Rehearse • Pre read • Note take • Annotate • Summarize
Examples of Strategies • Anticipation Guides/Student example • Frayer Models/Student example • Annotating exercises/Student example • Reaction Review Guides • Course Notebooks
Unofficial Results • Student Survey • Comparison of two MA 108R sections
Kathi Crowe kathi.crowe@kctcs.edu • Beth Healander beth.healander@kctcs.edu • Brandon Knight brandong.knight@kctcs.edu