260 likes | 281 Views
Chapter 3: The Litigation/Trial Process. David Baumer Spring 2003. The Trial Process. Litigation is expensive and risky for various reasons Damage awards can be highly variable Juries can be overpowered by emotion and award sums far in excess of “actual” damages
E N D
Chapter 3: The Litigation/Trial Process David Baumer Spring 2003
The Trial Process • Litigation is expensive and risky for various reasons • Damage awards can be highly variable • Juries can be overpowered by emotion and award sums far in excess of “actual” damages • In addition, things could leak out during litigation that could generate adverse publicity • Often caused by ex-employees • For these and other reasons, companies often take many measures to avoid court appearances
The Adversarial Process • If both parties have standing, it means • They have real current interests at stake • In general the plaintiff has the burden of proving by a • Preponderance of the evidence that his or her version of events are accurate and • Deserving of a verdict in his or her favor
Value of a Lawsuit: Plaintiff • The value of a lawsuit is based on • Expected values, which may have large variances, and • Reducing to present value, when any damage award is actually received • Adjustments should be made for • adverse publicity • cost of litigation • loss of future business relationship • risk aversion—probably should imagine the worst
Value of a Lawsuit: Defendant • Businesses are frequent targets for litigation • For business to business suits, there should be significant savings if the parties settle • These savings can be realized if the parties have similar expectations as to the outcome of the case • In many cases court litigation can be avoided altogether if the parties have agreed in a contract to arbitrate and have waived their right to sue in court • The decision as to how to deal with nuisance suits should take reputation into account
Stages of Litigation • In most cases when a person has a potential claim against another person, a settlement occurs, rather than litigation • Settlements can occur at any stage in litigation • Litigation begins with pleadings • Followed by motions • If motions to dismiss are denied then discovery begins • Following discovery there is a pretrial conference, a trial and then more motions and possible appeals
Litigation • Litigation may appear linear but it is actually iterative • Pleadings • The complaint is a short statement of facts which the plaintiff claims entitles him to a court remedy, if proved • Pleadings provides general notice to the defendant as to what the suit is about • Once the complaint is filed the defendant is served with a summons • Occasionally defendants evade lawsuits by evading service of summons
Pleadings and Motions • After the def. is served • He or she is required to file an answer within 20 or 30 days or else lose the case by default • Def.s may also file a motion to dismiss • May allege that the pl. failed to allege a cause of action--even if all the statements in the complaint are proved the def. is not liable to the pl. • If the motion is granted the case is over unless the pl. appeals and wins a reversal
Pleadings: Answer • In most cases the def. files an answer • It is common for def.s to issue of general denial of all the allegations contained in the complaint • In some answers, def.’s file affirmative defenses • In an affirmative defense the def. alleges additional facts that she claims exonerates her • Def.s have the burden of proof with respect to the facts alleged in support of the affirmative defenses
Counterclaim • When a def. files a counterclaim, she is claiming that the pl. is liable to her • Counterclaims have the same characteristics as the complaint, i.e., short statement of facts that provides notice to the other party • If the def. files a counterclaim, the pl. must file a reply, which has the same characteristics an answer • When there are multiple plaintiffs and defendants, there could be cross-claims between the pls.and defs.
Electronic Filing • Has the potential to be much more efficient than paper filing • In the past, firms had to hand carry motions to the courts • Searching documents was laborious • Copying records was expensive • Has the potential to eliminate much of the advantages associated with location of law offices relative to the courthouse
Discovery • Purpose of discovery is to allow parties to discover the facts necessary to prove or disprove allegations made in the pleadings • Enables one side to become aware of the other side’s evidence • Promotes settlements, especially when one side discovers its evidence is weaker than expected • During discovery the def. often files motions for a summary judgment (MSJ) • If the motion is granted, the case is over unless the pl. wins a reversal on appeal • MSJ should be granted if there is no genuine issue of fact
Discovery • Tools of discovery • Depositions--out of court questioning of witnesses, including parties • Written interrogatories--only allowed against other parties • Allows for more in-depth questioning requiring use of documents • Subpoena--one party requests that the other party produce documents
Discovery • Other tools of discovery • Requests for Admissions • Often used when the def. files a general denial • Used to narrow down exactly what the other party is saying is wrong • Physical and Mental Examinations • If the physical condition of either party is an issue, the other party can request a physical or mental examination • Refusal to cooperate during discovery is subject to sanction by the court, including dismissal of the case
Pretrial Conference • At the end of discovery, before the trial, the judge will call for a conference between the parties • At the pretrial conference, the judge will try to get the parties to settle • If the judge is unsuccessful in achieving a settlement, the judge will try to get the parties to stipulate to uncontested facts so that the focus of the trial can be on the contested facts
Trial • Jury trials cost more money, so parties often waive their right to have the case tried before a jury • During voir dire jurors are questioned for possible bias • Attorneys also have a certain number of preemptory challenges, which are challenges without stating a reason • In civil cases, there can be less than 12 jurors and verdicts that are not unanimous
Trials • Beginning with the pl., each side makes an opening statement • In the opening statement, a party states the facts it intends to prove to the jury • Proof often takes place through testimony, though there are other forms of presenting evidence • Motion for Directed Verdict • Often filed by the def. when the pl.’s case is weak • In the motion the def. claims that there is no credible proof of one or more of the elements of the cause of action • If the motion is granted the case is over unless the pl. wins a reversal on appeal
Trial • Closing arguments • Each side summarizes the evidence in a way that is favorable to their contentions • Jury instructions • Each side will propose its own version of jury instructions that is slightly slanted in their direction. If too one-sided, the judge will use the other side’s proposed instructions as a template • Jury instructions are a frequent basis for appeal
Verdict • Most juries do reach a verdict, especially in civil cases where unanimity is not required if both sides agree • It is a mistrial if there is a hung jury which takes place when the • There is disagreement among jurors and unanimity is required, or • The required majority is not achieved
Post Trial Motions • When it is apparent that the trial court judge made a mistake, he or she may grant a motion for new trial • Rather than having the decision of the trial court reversed on appeal • Misconduct by attorneys could be grounds for declaring a mistrial • Also a judge may disagree with the jury verdict and grant a motion for a new trial
Post Trial Motions • Motion for J. n.o.v. • If the motion is granted the judge is saying the case should not have gone to the jury, even though the judge allowed the jury to render a verdict • By allowing a case to go to a jury and then granting a J.n.o.v., there is a jury verdict if the decision to grant the J.n.o.v. is reversed • Allowing a case to go to a jury, but granting a J.n.o.v. conserves judicial resources
Remedies • As indicated previously, settlements can occur at any time, even after the jury verdict • The pl. may settle for something less than the jury award, but the def. agrees not to appeal • In most cases successful pls. are awarded compensatory damages • There are limits on recoveries for damages that are deemed too speculative • Contract pls. are awarded what they would have received had the contract not been breached • Tort pls. are awarded economic and non-econ. damages
Damage Awards • Punitive damages • Are generally not awarded in contract cases even if the breach of contract is deliberate • For intentional torts, the pl. may be able receive punitive damages, which are designed to punish the def. and deter other similarly situated defs. • Punitive damages can be awarded if the def. show a reckless disregard for the safety of others • Punitive damages should bear some reasonable relationship to compensatory damages
Equitable Remedies • A pl. may be able to get an temporary injunction, even before the trial takes place • Must be able to show that • Irreparable damage will take place if the def. is not stopped and • The pl. is likely to win if the case goes to trial • If the pl. wins at trial, the injunction may be made permanent • Contract pls. may request specific performance if monetary damages are inadequate and the consideration is unique, or has special value to the pl.
Appeals to Higher Courts • Appeals are generally based on errors of law by the trial court judge • Legal errors could take place based on • Motions, the granting or non-granting of motions • Jury instructions • Admission or non-admission of evidence • Appellate courts can • affirm the verdict of the trial court • reverse the trial court • reverse the trial court and remand the case for a new trial
Judgments • When a case has been decided, the doctrine of res judicata applies to prevent retrials of the same case in another state • State courts accord decisions made by the courts in other states comity • In most cases when the def. loses, he or she writes out a check to the pl • Sometimes the pl. has to obtain a writ of execution to enforce the judgment • Wages can be garnished or bank accounts seized • Liens can be placed on real property