300 likes | 517 Views
Overview. Basic Logic of School-wide PBSConnect points between school systems and families. Family Connection Foci. Understanding the ecology of the familyDevelopment of collaborative partnerships between parents and professionalsIdentification of family strengths and the child's positive contributionsDevelopment of standards and practices that strengthen family members and build on their existing skills and resourcesIdentification of sources of stress for the family(Koegel, L., Koegel, R9446
E N D
1. Families and Positive Behavior Support: Developing Connections to Improve Student Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D.
University of Missouri
Www.missouri.edu/~spedtl
OSEP Center on Positive
Behavioral Intervention & Supports
Www.pbis.org
3. Family Connection Foci Understanding the ecology of the family
Development of collaborative partnerships between parents and professionals
Identification of family strengths and the child’s positive contributions
Development of standards and practices that strengthen family members and build on their existing skills and resources
Identification of sources of stress for the family
(Koegel, L., Koegel, R., Boettcher, Brookman-Frazee, 2005;
Lucyshyn & Albin, 1993)
4. Starting Point Schools and their communities should define what “involvement” means across a continuum of behavioral supports
Schools should build a system that is accessible and open to family involvement
Schools cannot mandate family involvement
Schools must build a system of support that is not-contingent on family involvement
Families should also work toward understanding limitations of education system
5. A Working Definition of “Family Involvement” Awareness
Involvement
Support
6. School-Wide Positive Behavior Support
7. Common challenges facing educators… Problem behavior increasing
More students not coming to school prepared to learn (socially and academically)
Disconnect between traditional school “discipline” practices and student learning history
Students with chronic challenging behavior need comprehensive, school-wide systems of support
8. Typical responses to students Increase monitoring for future problem behavior
Re-review rules & sanctions
Extend continuum of aversive consequences
Improve consistency of use of punishments
Establish “bottom line”
Zero tolerance policies
Security guards, student uniforms, metal detectors, video cameras
Suspension/expulsion
Exclusionary options (e.g., alternative programs)
9. The Danger…. “Punishing” problem behaviors (without a proactive support system) is associated with increases in (a) aggression, (b) vandalism, (c) truancy, and (d) dropping out. (Mayer, 1995, Mayer & Sulzar-Azaroff, 1991, Skiba & Peterson, 1999)
10. Outcomes from current “discipline” system… Failed attempts to provide individualized and appropriate educational opportunities for students with disabilities and students from diverse backgrounds
Disenfranchisement of families and communities
Fragmented, redundant, and inefficient multidisciplinary efforts
11. Toward a Solution The answer is not the invention of new solutions, but the enhancement of the school’s organizational capacity to:
Accurately adopt and efficiently sustain their use of research-validated practices
Provide a Seamless continuum of behavioral and academic support for all students
Be part of a district wide system of behavior support
Increased focus, teacher training, community training, and funding for early intervention
12. Positive Behavior Supports PBS is a broad range of systemic and individualized strategies for achieving important social and learning outcomes while preventing problem behavior
OSEP Center on PBIS Emphasize that PBS should be viewed as a continuum of services -- Can’t have individual without system
Emphasize that PBS is concerned with teaching / building replacement behavior, not simply reducing problem behavior “ What do you want them to do instead?”
For all kids
Focus on prevention
Emphasize that PBS should be viewed as a continuum of services -- Can’t have individual without system
Emphasize that PBS is concerned with teaching / building replacement behavior, not simply reducing problem behavior “ What do you want them to do instead?”
For all kids
Focus on prevention
13. PBS is not... Not specific practice or curriculum…it’s a general approach to preventing problem behavior
Not limited to any particular group of students…it’s for all students
Not new…its based on long history of behavioral practices & effective instructional design & strategies
14. School-wide Systems of Positive Behavior Support Incorporate best practice in professional development and system change (teams)
Data-based decision making
Effective behavioral support is consistently implemented
Appropriate student behavior is taught and publicly acknowledged
Problem behaviors have clear consequences
Effective Behavioral Support strategies are designed to meet the needs of all students
Focus on establishing school environments that support long term success of effective practices {3-5 years}
Stress:
Teams
Use of data
Sustained practices
Effective practices--admin support, job embedded PD, building critical mass of staff fluent in skills, learning community/culture of learning more about PBS
Assessment--data driven decision making
continuum--all kids, tough kids who need more practice, toughest kids “heavy hitters” “frequent flyers”. Support for everyone!
Long term success--takes commitment, leadership (administrators and team)
Stress:
Teams
Use of data
Sustained practices
Effective practices--admin support, job embedded PD, building critical mass of staff fluent in skills, learning community/culture of learning more about PBS
Assessment--data driven decision making
continuum--all kids, tough kids who need more practice, toughest kids “heavy hitters” “frequent flyers”. Support for everyone!
Long term success--takes commitment, leadership (administrators and team)
15. The Good News… Research reviews indicate that the most effective responses to school violence are:
Social Skills Training
Academic Restructuring
Behavioral Interventions
(Elliot, Hamburg, & Williams, 1998; Gottfredson, 1997; Lipsey, 1991; 1992;Tolan & Guerra, 1994)
18. Universal Strategies: School-Wide Essential Features
Statement of purpose
Clearly define expected behaviors (Rules)
Procedures for teaching & practicing expected behaviors
Procedures for encouraging expected behaviors
Procedures for discouraging problem behaviors
Procedures for record-keeping and decision making (SWIS.org)
19. Benton
20. Universal Strategies: Nonclassroom Settings Identify Setting Specific Behaviors
Develop Teaching Strategies
Develop Practice Opportunities and Consequences
Assess the Physical Characteristics
Establish Setting Routines
Identify Needed Support Structures
Data collection strategies
21. Universal Strategies:Classroom Needed at the classroom level...
Use of school-wide expectations/rules
Effective Classroom Management
Behavior management
Instructional management
Environmental management
Support for teachers who deal with students who display high rates of problem behavior
22. Universals: Connect Points To Families Primary Focus = Awareness
Information, Information, Information (2-way)
Educators and parents sharing information across multiple venues
Involvement
Parent team member
Specific activities to partner with families at school
Support
Information regarding range of services & supports
Referral Points
Strategies for home use
23. Michigan project(Ballard-Krishan, McClure, Schmatz, Travnikar, Friedrich, & Nolan, 2003) Training teams comprised of educators and parents to train school teams in school-wide PBS
Demonstrate respect for each training team member’s knowledge
Identifying strengths of each trainer
Encourage and offer financial resources for training teams to attend professional development
Offer on-going mentoring
Provide all trainers with skills and resources to train
Clear operational policies
24. Benton Elementary Fourth year of school-wide PBS
Reluctant Families
Overview of system and connect points at back to school night -- message = partners in their children’s education
Targeted specific activities with time commitments
“Passport”
Complete passport = dinner with family
25. PBIS.org Educator Resources New Hampshire - Family Engagement Checklist
New York PBS Matrix for Family Involvement
26. Small Group/Targeted Connected to Universal systems
Simple “sort” based on presenting concerns
Social-Behavioral Concerns
Social skills
Self-management
Academic Concerns
Peer Tutors
Check in
Homework club
Emotional Concerns
Adult Mentors
27. Small Group/Targeted: Connect Points To Families Primary Focus = Involvement
Parent consent/ information meeting
Parent part of planning
Follow-up meetings and outcome sharing
Awareness
Continuum of supports explained
Referral points defined
Support
Partnership to explore school / home strategies
Quick easy “generalization strategies” for home use
28. Intensive / Individual Student Connected to Universal systems
Quick supportive response to teacher
Clear process to refer, assess, and plan
Cornerstone of individual plans = Functional Behavior Assessment
29. Individual/Intensive: Connect Points To Families Primary Focus = Support
Partner planning – strengths-based focus using functional behavioral assessment
Facilitating interagency programs
Targeted training/supports for families
Awareness
Information (e.g., IDEA, ADA, Mental Health, District Services)
Accessible referral point (special education / non-special education)
Teacher education RE impact on family
“Science” of behavior for both educators and family
Involvement
Family advocacy groups on school/district team
Parents of children with disabilities on school/district team
30. Conclusion
31. Parent Voices… Everyone who works with children, should strive to support the family as well as the child
Divorce “early intervention” from “early diagnosis”
Shorten the lag between research discoveries and application within schools
(Johnson, 2000)
Disseminate more information about PBS to educators
Ensure college/university faculty fluent with PBS
Collaborative partnerships start when children young
Keep the “pendulum” in the middle
(Fisher, 2000)
32. 12 Key Connections Between Individual/Intensive & Families Build collaborative partnerships with families and other professionals who serve the child or youth with a disability.
Adhere to family-centered principles and practices throughout assessment, support plan development, and implementation support activities.
Help families identify and achieve meaningful lifestyle outcomes for their child with a disability and the family as a whole.
Recognize that problem behaviors are primarily problems of learning.
Understand that communication is the foundation of positive behavior.
Conduct functional assessments to understand the functions of problem behavior and the variables that influence behavior and to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of behavior support plans.
33. 12 Key Connections Between Individual/Intensive & Families Develop individualized, multi-component support plans that help families create effective family contexts in which problem behaviors are irrelevant, ineffective, and inefficient at achieving their purpose.
Ensure that PBS plans are a good contextual fit with family life.
Utilize the family activity setting as a unit of analysis and intervention that can help families embed interventions into family life.
Provide implementation support that is tailored to family needs and preferences.
Engage in a process of continuous evaluation of child and family outcomes.
Offer support to families, professionals, and other members of a support team in a spirit of sincerity and humility.
(Lucyshyn, Horner, Dunlap, Albin, & Ben, 2002, p. 13)
34. Family Support References Ballard-Krishan, S. A., McClure, L., Schmatz, B., Travnikar, B., Friedrich, G., & Nolan, M. (2003). The Michigan PBS iniative: Advancing the spirit of collaboration by including parents in the delivery of personnel development opportunities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5, 122-126.
Fisher, C. (2000). Ripple or tidal wave: What can make a difference? Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 120-122.
Johnson, C. (2000). What do families need? Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 115-117.
Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Boettcher, M., & Brookman-Frazee, L. (2005). Extending behavior support in home and community settings. In L.M. Bambara & L. Kern (Eds.) Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior support plans (pp. 334-358). New York: Guilford Press.
Lucyshyn, J. M., & Albin, R. W. (1993). Comprehensive support to families of children with disabilities and behavior problems: Keeping it “friendly.” In G.H.S. Singer & L.E. Powers (Eds.) Families, disability, and empowerment: Active coping skills and strategies for family interventions (pp. 365-407). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Lucyshyn, J. M., Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Albin, R. W., & Ben, K. (2002). Positive behavior support with families. In J.M. Lucyshyn, G. Dunlap, & R. W. Albin (Eds.), Families and positive behavior support (pp. 3-44). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Lucyshyn, J. M., Dunlap, G., & Albin, R. W. (Eds.), Families and positive behavior support. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Singer, G. H. S., Goldberg-Hamblin, S. E., Peckham-Hardin, K. D., Barry, L., & Santarelli, G. E. (2002). In J.M. Lucyshyn, G. Dunlap, & R. W. Albin (Eds.), Families and positive behavior support (pp. 155-183). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Stichter, J. P., & Calidicott, J. M. (1999). Families, school collaboration, and shared vision in the context of IDEA. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 252-255.
Vaughn, B. J., White, R., Johnston, S., & Dunlap, G. (2005). Positive behavior support as a family-centered endeavor. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 27, 55-58.