430 likes | 540 Views
Chromatic Coloring with a Maximum Color Class. Bor-Liang Chen Kuo-Ching Huang Chih-Hung Yen* 30 July, 2009. Throughout this talk, all graphs considered are finite , undirected , loopless and without multiple edges. Definitions and Notations. Definitions and Notations.
E N D
Chromatic Coloring with a Maximum Color Class Bor-Liang Chen Kuo-Ching Huang Chih-Hung Yen* 30 July, 2009
Throughout this talk, all graphs considered are finite, undirected, loopless and without multiple edges.
Definitions and Notations • A proper k-coloring of a graph G is a labeling f : V(G) {1, 2, ... , k} such that adjacent vertices have different labels. The labels are colors; the vertices of one color form a color class.
Definitions and Notations • The chromatic number of a graph G, written χ(G), is the least k such that G has a proper k-coloring. • A chromatic coloring of a graph G is a proper coloring of G using χ(G) colors.
Definitions and Notations • An independent set in a graph is a set of pairwise nonadjacent vertices. • The independence number of a graph G, written (G), is the maximum size of an independent set in G.
Definitions and Notations • An independent set in a graph G is maximum if it has size (G). • Any color class S in a proper coloring of a graph G is obviously an independent set. If S is also amaximum independent set in G, then we say that the color class S is maximum.
Problem • We would like to know whether there exists a chromatic coloring of a graph G in which some color class is maximum.
Problem • We would like to know whether there exists a chromatic coloring of a graph G in which some color class is maximum. However, this cannot be guaranteed if χ(G) (G).
A graph G has a chromatic coloringin which some color class is maximumif and only if there exists a maximum independent set S in G such that(G S) = (G) 1.
Example χ(G) = 2 < 3 = (G) χ(G S) = 2
Example χ(G) = 3 < 4 = (G) χ(G S) = 3
Example χ(G) = 4 < 5 = (G) χ(G S) = 4
Example χ(G) = 4 < 5 = (G) χ(G S) = 4
Main Results • Theorem. Let G be a graph with χ(G) (G). Then there exists a chromatic coloring of Gin which some color class is maximum.
Preliminaries • Brooks’ Theorem. (1941) If G is a connected graph other than an odd cycle or a complete graph, then χ(G) (G).
Preliminaries • Lemma 1. Let G be a graph with χ(G) (G), and also let S be a maximum independent set in G. Then (G S) (G) 1if and only ifeach component of GS is not an odd cycle when (G) 3 or a complete graph of order (G) when (G) 3.
Proof. () It is trivial. () Suppose that (G S) (G) 1. Then (G S) (G). Hence, there must exist one component Gi of GS such that (Gi) (G). Since S is a maximum independent set in G, each vertex of V(G) S in G must be adjacent to some vertex of S, and (G) (G S) (Gi). Then, by (Gi) (G) (G) (Gi) andBrooks’ Theorem, either Gi is an odd cycle with (Gi) (G) 3, or Gi is a complete graph with |V(Gi)| (Gi) (G) 3. This is a contradiction.
Definitions and Notations • An odd path-component oran odd cycle-component of a graph G is a component of G isomorphic to an odd path or an odd cycle. AKn-component of G is a component of G isomorphic to a complete graph of order n. • If a path P in G is from vertex u to vertex v, then u and v are the endpoints of P.
Definitions and Notations Given a nonempty proper subset SofV(G). • A (S, S)-chain in G is a path that alternates between vertices in S and vertices in S, where S denotes V(G) S. • The set consisting of the neighbors of vertices of S in G is denoted by NG(S).
Preliminaries • Lemma 2. Let G be a connected graph with χ(G) (G) 3. The there exists a maximum independent setS in G such that (G S) 2 χ(G) 1.
Proof. By Lemma 1, it suffices to show that there exists a maximum independent set S in G such that GS contains no odd cycle-components. Hence, among all maximum independent sets in G, we let S be one satisfying that GS contains the least number of odd cycle-components, and denote such a number by t. We claim that t 0.
Proof.(continued) Suppose otherwise. Then t 1, and we use C to denote someodd cycle-component of GS.Consider any vertex v1 in C. Then there must exist exactly a vertex w1 of S adjacent to v1 in G and (GS) (G) 1 2. Now, let Pv1w1 v2w2 be a maximal(S, S)-chain from v1 in G.Thenvi Sandwi Sfor alli 1.
Proof.(continued) Furthermore, let r denote the leasti such that (1) wihas less than 3 neighbors in G or (2) the two neighbors of wi other than vi in G are not exactly the two endpoints of some odd path-component of GS.
w2 w1 wn S P v1 GS u2 v2 un vn un+1 vn+1 (1) If r does not exist, then
w2 w1 wn S P v1 GS u2 v2 un vn un+1 vn+1 (1) If r does not exist, then
w2 w1 wr1 wr S P v1 GS vr+1 u2 v2 ur1 vr1 ur vr (2) If r exists, then
w2 w1 wr1 wr S P v1 GS vr+1 u2 v2 ur1 vr1 ur vr (2) If r exists, then
wr v1 GS u2 v2 ur1 vr1 ur vr (2) If r exists, then
Preliminaries • Lemma 3. Let G be a connected graph with χ(G) (G) 4. The there exists a maximum independent set S in G such that (G S) (G) 1.
Main Results • Theorem 4. Let G be a graph with χ(G) (G). Then there exists a maximum independent set S in G such that χ(G S) χ(G) 1.
Proof. Suppose that G consists of the components G1, G2, …, Gt, where t 1. It suffices to claim that there exists a maximum independent set Si in each component Gi such that χ(GiSi) χ(G) 1. First, if χ(Gi) χ(G) 1, then any maximum independent set Si in Gi has the property that χ(GiSi) χ(Gi) χ(G) 1. Next, if χ(Gi) χ(G) (Gi), then Gi is an odd cycleor a complete graph. Moreover, if χ(Gi) χ(G) (Gi) 2, then Gi is a path or an even cycle. In each of these two cases, it is not difficult to find a maximum independent set Si in Gi such that χ(GiSi) χ(Gi) 1 χ(G) 1. Finally, if χ(Gi) χ(G) (Gi) 3, then there exists a maximum independent set Si in Gi such that χ(GiSi) χ(Gi) 1 χ(G) 1 by Lemmas 2 and 3.
Main Results • Corollary 5. Let G be a graph with χ(G) (G). Then there exists a chromatic coloring of Gin which some color class is maximum.
Definitions and Notations • Let χmax(G)denotethe least ksuch thata graph G has a proper k-coloring in which some color class is maximum.
Main Results • Proposition 6. χ(G) χmax(G)χ(G) + 1 for any graph G.
Proof. Let S be a maximum independent set in G. Since GS is a subgraph of G,we haveχ(GS) χ(G). Then it is easy to obtain that χmax(G) χ(GS) + 1 χ(G) + 1 byadding the additional color class S to a chromatic coloring of GS. Besides, it is trivial thatχmax(G) χ(G).
Main Results • Corollary 7. Let G be a graph with χ(G) (G). Then χmax(G)χ(G).
Main Results • Corollary 8. If G is a connected graph other than an odd cycle or a complete graph, then χmax(G) (G).
Proof. By Brooks’ Theorem, we have χ(G) (G). If χ(G) (G) 1, then χmax(G) χ(G) + 1 ((G) 1) + 1 (G). If χ(G) (G), then χmax(G) χ(G) (G) by Corollary 7. Hence, the assertion holds.
Main Results • Theorem 9. A graph G with (G) 3 χ(G) is equitably 3-colorable if and only if one of the following statements holds: 1. no components of G or at least two components of G are K3,3; 2. (G K3,3) |V(G K3,3) | / 3.