1 / 26

Pensoft Journal System 1.0 ⇒ 2.0

ViBRANT. Lyubomir Penev , Jordan Biserkov , Teodor Georgiev , Pavel Stoev. Pensoft Journal System 1.0 ⇒ 2.0. Pro- iBiosphere Workshop, 11-15 February 2013, Leiden. What is the PJs?. What is the PJS?. Online platform for: Authoring via Pensoft Writing Tool (PWT) Peer-review

elinor
Download Presentation

Pensoft Journal System 1.0 ⇒ 2.0

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ViBRANT LyubomirPenev, Jordan Biserkov, TeodorGeorgiev, PavelStoev Pensoft Journal System 1.0 ⇒ 2.0 Pro-iBiosphere Workshop, 11-15 February 2013, Leiden

  2. What is the PJs?

  3. What is the PJS? • Online platform for: • Authoring viaPensoft Writing Tool (PWT) • Peer-review • Editing • Publishing • Dissemination of scientific papers

  4. Pensoft Writing Tool (PWT) • The manuscript of the future • Today! • (almost)

  5. Reviewers types in pjs 2.0

  6. Nominated reviewer • Receives a formal request • Cancelled if not responded to with N days • Expected to submit a thorough review • Can edit and comment online • Has an individual due-date • Reminded via email if late

  7. Panel reviewers • Receive a notification • No obligation is taken up or implied • Encouraged to submit a review • Can comment • Have a common due-date • Can’t work on manuscript after due-date • Not reminded via email

  8. Review processesin PJS 2.0

  9. Review processes in PJS 2.0

  10. Review processes in PJS 2.0

  11. Review processes in PJS 2.0

  12. Review processes in PJS 2.0

  13. Feedback Decision

  14. Markup

  15. Upfront OR In-House markup ? • We have both of them! • PJS 1.0 + PMT • PWT + PJS 2.0 • The journal decides which one to offer • Then the authors choose

  16. What formats does PJS 2.0 use? • XML in • XML out • XML throughout • The humans never see it! • They read the web page • or download the PDF

  17. Just to make this really clear • Author DO NOT DO markup in PWT! • They just write their manuscripts • the PWT DOES the markup for them

  18. Benefits for authors

  19. Benefits for authors • All versions of the manuscript stored online • Faster, better peer-reviews • Can suggested reviewers • Simplified interface • No software to install, totally web based • Article parts are marked-up, not trapped in a monolithic publication. • Article parts are stored in appropriate worldwide databases

  20. Benefits for reviewers

  21. Benefits for reviewers • Easy on-line editing • Credit for reviews – option to publish the review alongside the article • Simplified interface, no-nonsense dashboard, clear due dates • Email reminders

  22. Benefits for journals

  23. Benefits for journals • Per journal settings for • manuscript types • review process types • due dates • file-based or/and web-based workflow • Technical excellence • United user (authors, reviewers, editors) base across the different journals. Journals benefit from each other. • Frequently Asked Questions by society journals that want to move to advanced open access publishing • http://www.pensoft.net/FAQ-by-society-journals

  24. Work flow

  25. Document flow Reviewer 1 versionn Reviewer 1 versionn edit copy merge Author’s versionn Subject Editor versionn Merged Vversionn Accept/Reject changes, edit Decision,revisions merge Reviewer 2 versionn Reviewer 2 Vversionn copy edit

  26. Thank you foryour attention!

More Related