EU Horizon 2020 instruments for a H2020 ESSnuSB Project

1. EU Horizon 2020 instruments for a H2020 ESSnuSB Project Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund

2. Outline • Context relevant to EC decisions • Goals and objectives of Horizon 2020, succeeding to FP7 • Instruments and Call calendar in H2020 • Other EC instruments Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund

3. Context For Research Infrastructures, the goal of the EC instrument is primarily to create a coherent “ecosystem” of scientific research infrastructures in Europe. Hence the importance of proposing infrastructures that are coherent and synergetic with former EC investments and existing reference roadmaps: • Former and running EC FP7 projects • ESFRI roadmap with the European Strategy for HEP as its HEP extension Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund

4. Context: EC funded neutrino projects • EUROnu: FP7 Design Study, 1/9/2008 to 31/8/2012, 4 ME over 4 years, 15 EU institutes (BE, BU, CH, DE, FR, IT, SP, UK) ; Review of the three currently accepted methods to realize neutrino oscillation facilities (Superbeams, Beta Beams and Neutrino Factories), with assessments of physics reach, cost and risk. • LAGUNA & LAGUNA-LBNO: FP7 Design Studies: i), 1/7/2008 to 31/7/2010, 1.7 ME over 2 years, ii) 1/9/2011 to 31/8/2014, 4.9 ME over 3 years; 21 EU institutes. Design study of a EU underground laboratory in seven pre-selected locations with geo-technical assessment of the cavern needed, and evaluation of costs and impact, including long baseline neutrino physics with beams from CERN. Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund

5. Context 1: EC funded neutrino projects Requirement 1: Whatever EC instrument is proposed, it is necessary to show clearly the relations of the new ESSnuSB proposal to EUROnu and LAGUNA and demonstrate complementarity and networking. Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund

6. Context 2: The European Strategy for Particle Physics “CERN should develop a neutrino programme to pave the way for a substantial European role in future long-baseline experiments. Europe should explore the possibility of major participation in leading long-baseline neutrino projects in the US and Japan.” Requirement 2: Clarify the situation of the proposal with respect to the HEP Strategy, that is taken as the ESFRI list extension for HEP. (ESFRI: the European Strategy Forum for Research Infrastructures) Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund

7. We are here Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund

8. Horizon 2020Research Infrastructures • Developing the European infrastructures for 2020 and beyond • Development of new world-class research infrastructures. Support will be provided for the implementation and operation of the research infrastructures listed on the ESFRI Roadmap. Support will cover the preparatory phase of new ESFRI projects, and the implementation and the operation phases of prioritised ESFRI projects. Further world-class facilities will also be part of this action. • Opening the national facilities by integrating them into networks (IA’s). • Development of ICT based • Fostering the innovation potential of the infrastructures and their human • Reinforcing European policy and international cooperation Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund

9. WorkProgramme H2020-INFRADEV-2014-2015 1- H2020-INFRADEV-1-2014 – Design Studies (bottom-up) Publication date: 2013-12-11; deadline 2014-9-2; total budget 15 ME Specific challenge: The aim of this activity is to support the conceptual and technical design and preparatory actions for new research infrastructures, which are of a clear European dimension and interest. Major upgrades of existing infrastructures may also be considered if the end result is intended to be equivalent to, or capable of replacing, an existing infrastructure. Scope: Design studies should address all key questions concerning the technical, legal and financial feasibility of new or upgraded facilities, leading to a 'conceptual or technical design report' showing the maturity of the concept and forming the basis for decision makers. Expected impact: awareness of funding bodies, sound basis for policy bodies, capacity building thanks to advanced technical work. Funding:typically between 1 and 3 ME Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund

10. WorkProgramme H2020-INFRADEV-2014-2015 2- H2020-INFRADEV-2-2015 –PP of ESFRI projects (targetted) Publication date: 2013-12-11; deadline 2015-1-14; total budget 14 ME Expected impact: raise the technical, legal and financial maturity of projects for new research infrastructures to the level required to enable the construction work to start. Funding: up to 2 ME 3- H2020-INFRADEV-3-2015 –Implementation and operation of ESFRI projects (targetted); Funding up to 15 ME. Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund

11. WorkProgramme H2020-INFRADEV-2014-2015 4- H2020-INFRADEV-4-2014/2015 –Implementation and operation of cross-cutting services and solutions for clusters of ESFRI and other RI’s. Publication date: 2013-12-11; deadline 2014-9-2; total budget 55 + 25 ME Specific challenge: break isolation of ESFRI RI’s Scope: for proposals built around ESFRI projects; Proposals should develop synergies and complementarity between ESFRI projects, optimise technological implementation, coordination, harmonisation, integration…in specific thematic areas. Expected impact: …development of a consistent European research infrastructures ecosystem… Funding request expected between 6 and 15 ME Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund

12. EC Evaluation grid Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund

13. New in Horizon 2020 • Funding rate for research: up to 100% of total cost (was 75%) • Overheads: 25% of direct costs for all participants (was 65% flat rate or “real” overheads from analytical accounting) • Signature of GA max 8 months after deadline of Call. For the DS 2/5/2015 max. Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund

14. OtherEC Instruments Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, ESSnuSB meeting in Lund