1 / 12

P802.11p Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot

P802.11p Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot. Authors:. Date: 2009-07-15. This document contains the report to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee in support of a request for conditional approval to send IEEE P802.11u Draft 8.0 to Sponsor Ballot.

elise
Download Presentation

P802.11p Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. P802.11p Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot Authors: Date:2009-07-15 Lee Armstrong, Armstrong Consulting, Inc.

  2. This document contains the report to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee in support of a request for conditional approval to send IEEE P802.11u Draft 8.0 to Sponsor Ballot. • This document (11-09/0871rx) was approved during the closing plenary session of the 802.11 working group on 17th July 2009. • Passed in the Task Group <result> • Passed in the Working Group <result> Summary Lee Armstrong, Armstrong Consulting, Inc.

  3. 802.11 WG Letter Ballot Results – P802.11p Lee Armstrong, Armstrong Consulting, Inc.

  4. Comments by Ballot : Values Lee Armstrong, Armstrong Consulting, Inc.

  5. Comments by Ballot : Key • Non-Voter: comment accepted from a non-voter • Withdrawn: comment formally withdrawn by voter • Not Required: comment indicated as not required to satisfy voter • Satisfied: comment required to satisfy voter that is indicated as satisfied either by the voter indicating satisfaction with the specific comment, or by voting yes in a subsequent ballot • Unsatisfied: comment not meeting any of the above criteria – i.e., a comment that is indicated to be “required” by the voter, and the voter is maintaining a “no” vote, and the voter has not responded when asked about their satisfaction with the comment resolution or the voter has indicated they are unsatisfied with the comment resolution. Lee Armstrong, Armstrong Consulting, Inc.

  6. Unsatisfied Comments Lee Armstrong, Armstrong Consulting, Inc.

  7. Unsatisfied Comments : Key • The table shows the count of unsatisfied editorial comments and technical comments separately. The comments are then classified into: • A – Accepted. The comment was accepted and the change indicated by the commenter was approved. • C – Countered. The comment was accepted in principle, but a different change to the one indicated by the commenter was approved. • R – Rejected. The comment was declined and no change to address the comment was approved. Lee Armstrong, Armstrong Consulting, Inc.

  8. By commenter Lee Armstrong, Armstrong Consulting, Inc.

  9. 11p Topics – 1 Lee Armstrong, Armstrong Consulting, Inc.

  10. Unsatisfied comments • The composite of all unsatisfied comments and the resolutions approved by the comment resolution committee received during <sponsor|working group> ballot may be found in document: <doc ref> • A copy of this is attached. • Double click on the icon to the right to open this. • A copy of this same data presented using MyBallot access database report format is attached. • Double click on the icon to the right to open this. Lee Armstrong, Armstrong Consulting, Inc.

  11. 802.11 EC Motion – <agenda item#> <Conditional> Approval to send P802.11u to <Sponsor Ballot | RevCom> • Grant <conditional approval, under Clause 13 | approval>, to forward P802.11u Draft <n>.0 to Sponsor Ballot. • P802.11u had a <number>% approval on the last WG Recirculation Ballot. There were <n> voters that had voted NO [, then <number> of the NO voters changed to a YES vote]. • Task Group Vote on the Motion Passed: <for> y, <against> n, <abstain> a • Working Group vote on the Motion Passed: <for> y, <against> n, <abstain> a • Moved: <WG Chair> 2nd: <name> • Yes No Abstain It is critical that a properly formed motion be presented to the EC for consideration in the Friday afternoon session during the plenary when approval is requested. The wording of the motion used in the TG and then the WG does not need to be identical but complementary. Updates of the WG11 templates are needed. Lee Armstrong, Armstrong Consulting, Inc.

  12. 802.11 EC Motion – <agenda item#> Conditional Approval to send P802.11p to Sponsor Ballot • Grant conditional approval, under Clause 13 to forward P802.11p Draft 9.0 to Sponsor Ballot. • P802.11p had a 85.41% approval on the last WG Recirculation Ballot. • Working Group 11 vote on the Motion Passed: <for> y, <against> n, <abstain> a • Moved: Bruce Kraemer 2nd: <name> • Yes No Abstain Lee Armstrong, Armstrong Consulting, Inc.)

More Related