150 likes | 329 Views
The U.S.-E.U. Safe Harbor Framework New Developments in Data Flows, Standards, & Compliance. Damon Greer U.S. Department of Commerce August 19, 2008. Safe Harbor Review How We Got Here.
E N D
The U.S.-E.U. Safe Harbor FrameworkNew Developments in Data Flows, Standards, & Compliance Damon Greer U.S. Department of Commerce August 19, 2008
Safe Harbor Review How We Got Here • European Union’s Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC) in force 1998; Member States implement national data protection laws; • U.S. does not meet EU’s adequacy requirement; U.S. Dept. of Commerce and European Commission negotiate compromise: U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework; in force November 1, 2000; • Nearly 1,600 U.S. organizations certified to Safe Harbor; 240 in first six months 2008 (45 in July)
Adequacy via the Safe Harbor • Safe Harbor certification is voluntary representation to European business partners and European citizens that U.S. companies will comply with the Safe Harbor Framework; • Eligibility limited to entities who fall under jurisdiction of the FTC and DOT – financial services sector, insurance, telecommunications common carriers, non-profits and meat processing enterprises not eligible ; • Nearly 1,600 U.S. organizations, including multinationals and SMEs are certified; valid for one year and commitment must be reaffirmed annually
The Safe Harbor Framework • 7 Privacy Principles • 15 Frequently Asked Questions • EU’s Adequacy Determination • Letters Between DoC & EC • Letters Between FTC, DOT, and EC • http://export.gov/safeharbor/
Compliance & Enforcement • In general, enforcement takes place in the U.S. in accordance with U.S. law (Section 5 Authority under FTC Act); • Private Sector Enforcement which has 3 elements: verification, dispute resolution, and remedies; • Human Resources* – Special Case: Must use EU data protection authorities for dispute resolution & follow national data protection laws with regard to HR; know about works councils
Compliance& Enforcement • U.S. culture of customer service is highly effective in addressing customer complaints/concerns, perhaps more than comprehensive legislation; • Independent recourse mechanisms are required to notify DoC of a company’s failure to comply with the Safe Harbor principles, and FTC has authority to take action. • No referrals or complaints filed with the EU DPAs; TRUSTe, BBB, DMA, and others report internal complaints resolved.
The Article 26 Derogations • Joining Safe Harbor is not the only meansof meeting theEU Directive’s requirements • Choices include: • “Unambiguous” consent of the data subject • Necessary to perform contract • Codes of Conduct • Standard Contractual Clauses • Direct compliance/registration with EU Authorities http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/index_en.htm
Developments in Data Protection/Privacy • ISO’s Joint Technical Committee Work on Global Privacy • Standard (4th Working Draft); • ISO’s JTC-1 SC 27 Proposes “Study Period” to examine forensic • processes’ standardization for digital evidence; • International Conference of Data Protection & Privacy • Commissioners serves as liaison to ISO privacy standards • development; • Standards Council of Canada convinces ISO/TMB to study • creation of Technical Committee for Privacy – June 2008
Developments in Data Protection/Privacy cont’d • EC’s DG for Information Society & Media proposes draft • privacy rules for RFID technologies; • Article 29 Working Party’s 2008 Work Program includes standards • development, e-discovery, review of regulatory framework for ecom- • munications within EU, search engines and new technologies with • privacy implications; • Since autumn 2007, rising concern in the EU over the use of e-discovery • for massive data transfers to U.S. either in anticipation of litigation or as • a result of ongoing civil court action.
Transatlantic Engagement • Continued dialogue with the European Commission; Conference on International Transfers of Personal Data, Brussels, October 2006; October 2007 in Washington, DC; • Workshop on International Transfers of Data, October 21, 2008, Centre de Conferences Albert Borschette (CCAB), Rue Froissart 36, B-1049 Brussels, Belgium • Increased Emphasis by Industry on Harmonizing Approval Process for Binding Corporate Rules; push by Art. 29 WP Chair has resulted in new BCR documents
We Self-Certify Compliance with: Safe Harbor Certification Mark
For additional information or questions Damon C. Greer U.S. Department of Commerce Telephone: (202) 482-5023 Fax: (202) 482-5522 Email: damon.greer@mail.doc.gov http://export.gov/safeharbor/