1 / 26

Can we explain differences in interactions of sFRPs with Wnt by in silico analysis?

Can we explain differences in interactions of sFRPs with Wnt by in silico analysis?. Catalina Hernàndez Sánchez Marlène Jagut Aline Stedman Karine Treguer Danuta Wawrzak. The canonical pathway Wnt 1,2,2b,3a,7a,7b,8,8b Fz 1,3, 5,7. The Ca2+ pathway Wnt 4,5a,11 Fz 2,7.

elkan
Download Presentation

Can we explain differences in interactions of sFRPs with Wnt by in silico analysis?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Can we explain differences in interactions of sFRPs with Wnt by in silico analysis? Catalina Hernàndez Sánchez Marlène Jagut Aline Stedman Karine Treguer Danuta Wawrzak

  2. The canonical pathway Wnt 1,2,2b,3a,7a,7b,8,8b Fz 1,3, 5,7 The Ca2+ pathway Wnt 4,5a,11 Fz 2,7 The Wnt binding partners The planar polarity pathway Wnt 5a,11 Fz 1,7

  3. The sFRPs structure CRD Cystein Rich Domain NTR Netrin domain • - Wnt binding domain. • CRD similar to the CRD of Fz • 10 conserved cysteines : 5 disulphide bridges. • Domain similar to the Netrins • Netrin = extracellular proteins • Netrin = control guidance of CNS commissuralaxons

  4. Differential interaction patterns of sFRPs with Wnts

  5. The sFRPs are highly conserved (ClustalW) X = xenopus G = chicken ZF = zebrafish M = mouse

  6. The sFRPs are highly conserved (ClustalW) X = xenopus G = chicken ZF = zebrafish M = mouse

  7. The sFRPs are highly conserved (ClustalW) sFRP1 and 5 are very close

  8. The sFRPs are highly conserved (ClustalW) X = xenopus G = chicken ZF = zebrafish M = mouse

  9. The sFRPs are highly conserved (ClustalW) X = xenopus G = chicken ZF = zebrafish M = mouse

  10. The sFRPs are highly conserved (ClustalW) X = xenopus G = chicken ZF = zebrafish M = mouse

  11. The sFRPs are highly conserved (ClustalW) sFRP4 and 3 are very close

  12. The CRD domain of sFRPs is highly conserved between the species (ClustalW) CRD of sFRP 3 CRD of sFRP 3 CRD of sFRP 3

  13. The CRD domain of sFRPs is highly conserved between the species (ClustalW) CRD of sFRP 3 CRD of sFRP 3 CRD of sFRP 3 10 cysteines residues

  14. Alignment of the five CRD domains of mouse sFRPs (ClustalW)

  15. Alignment of the five CRD domains of mouse sFRPs (ClustalW)

  16. Alignment of the five CRD domains of mouse sFRPs (ClustalW)

  17. Alignment of the five CRD domains of mouse sFRPs (ClustalW)

  18. PDB-blast to choose the good template to model sFRPs

  19. PDB-blast to choose the good template to model sFRPs PDB-blast for sFRP 1, 2 and 5: Template: CRD frizzled 8

  20. PDB-blast to choose the good template to model sFRPs PDB-blast for sFRP 1, 2 and 5: Template: CRD frizzled 8 PDB-blast for sFRP 3 and 4: Template: CRD sFRP3

  21. Modeling of the CRD domains sFRPs sFRP1 sFRP2 sFRP5 sFRP3 sFRP4 Template: CRD frizzled 8 Template: CRD sFRP3

  22. Comparison of the CRD domains of sFRP2 and sFRP4 sFRP2 sFRP4

  23. Comparison of the CRD domains of sFRP2 and sFRP4 sFRP2 sFRP4

  24. sFRP1 Merge sFRP1 and CRD sFRP3 Merge sFRP1 and Fz8 • Both of the templates give the same results (which is true for all the FRPs)

  25. sFRP4

  26. sFRP5

More Related