1 / 42

Immigrants in the U.S. Economy: A Host Country Perspective

Immigrants in the U.S. Economy: A Host Country Perspective. Pia Orrenius, Ph.D. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Sam Houston State University Huntsville, Texas April 12, 2008. Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are those of the presenter;

elke
Download Presentation

Immigrants in the U.S. Economy: A Host Country Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Immigrants in the U.S. Economy: A Host Country Perspective Pia Orrenius, Ph.D. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Sam Houston State University Huntsville, Texas April 12, 2008 Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are those of the presenter; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System.

  2. Overview • Immigration • Population, labor force growth • Changing characteristics of foreign born • Reasons for coming: Cyclical, regional effects • U.S. workers • Taxpayers • Policy

  3. U.S. Immigrants:How many are there?

  4. The foreign-born population islarger than ever before Source: Census Bureau

  5. And foreign-born share of population headed to historic peak Source: Census Bureau

  6. U.S. Immigrants:What do they do?

  7. Foreign-born share of employment growth substantial Percent 2003-2006 Source: BLS

  8. Foreign-born share of employment growth by selected occupations Percent 2003-2006 Source: BLS

  9. U.S. Immigration: How has it changed?

  10. Increasingly bimodal education distribution of foreign-born workers Percent Source: Ottaviano & Peri, 2005

  11. Illegal inflows rival legal Source: Jeffrey Passel and Roberto Suro, Pew Hispanic Center (2005)

  12. Three out of ten foreign-born are undocumented Source: Pew Hispanic Center(2005)

  13. U.S. Immigrants: Why do they come?

  14. Why do they come? • Economic conditions • Destination • Origin • Family reunification • Social or political conditions • War • Persecution

  15. Real-time migration, U.S. and Mexican business cycles Thousands, SA Migrant apprehensions Source: CBP, Department of Homeland Security

  16. Apprehensions a function of labor demand(Detrended employment, apprehensions lagged 6m) Thousands, SA Thousands, SA Employment Apprehensions Source: BLS, DHS

  17. Among Mexican immigrants, illegals more mobile than legals Percent Source: Bean et al, 2007

  18. U.S. Immigrants: Where do they go?

  19. Growth in the foreign-born population 1990-2006 Percent 0 - 99 100- 199 200- 299 300- 434 Source: Census, ACS

  20. State GDP growth drives foreign-born population growth FB growth + GSP + FB growth + GSP - FB growth – GSP + FB growth – GSP - Source: Census, ACS, BEA

  21. U.S. immigration:How are natives affected?

  22. Effects of immigration on natives • Immigration has effects similar to trade • GDP rises, GDP per capita rises • Who benefits? • Immigrants • Bulk of GDP increase goes to them • Natives get $30 to $60 billion • Consumers • Prices of certain goods and services fall • Capitalists (investors, producers, homeowners)

  23. Effects of immigration on natives • Who loses? • Wage effects • Low-skilled native workers • Prior immigrants • Fiscal effects • Certain taxpayers

  24. Wages of less-skilled workers in long-run stagnation Real median weekly earnings by education level High school diploma, no college Source: BLS

  25. Wages of less-skilled workers in long-run stagnation Real median weekly earnings by education level High school diploma, no college Source: BLS

  26. Wage Effects of Immigration • Models with large adverse effects (Borjas 2003) • Assume perfect substitutability, no change in capital • 3% drop in native earnings on average • 9% drop for natives who are low-skilled • Other models (Ottaviano & Peri 2006) • Allow imperfect substitutability, change in K

  27. Native-born labor force change, by education Thousands Source: 1996-2006; BLS, Haver Analytics

  28. Native and foreign-born labor force change, by education Thousands Source: 1996-2006; BLS, Haver Analytics

  29. Wage Effects of Immigration • Models with large adverse effects (Borjas 2003) • Assume perfect substitutability;no change in K • 3% drop in native earnings on average • 9% drop for natives who are low-skilled • Other models (Ottaviano & Peri 2006) • Allow imperfect substitutability, change in K • 2% rise in native earnings on average • 1% drop for low-skilled natives • Big declines for prior immigrants

  30. Fiscal impact of immigration • Fiscal impact • Tax contributions minus transfer payments and cost of public services received, expressed in net present value • Tax contributions include • Payroll, income, sales, property taxes • Majority of illegal immigrants have payroll taxes withheld • Public transfers and services include • Education, health care, welfare (EITC, TANF), police and fire • Estimates • Gold standard: National Research Council (1997) • Recent work: Robert Rector’s piece for Heritage • Household-level analysis

  31. NRC: Immigrants have positive fiscal impact when including their descendants 1996 Dollars, NPV Level of Education Source: National Research Council, The New Americans (1997)

  32. NRC: But immigrants have a negative fiscal impact in their lifetime 1996 Dollars, NPV Source: National Research Council, The New Americans (1997)

  33. U.S. immigration policy: Where are we headed?

  34. Walls on the Southern border not new

  35. Where is policy headed? • More interior enforcement • No-match program, Real ID Act, worksite raids, higher employer fines • E-verify: immigration status verification • Local, state enforcement of immigration laws • Local, state ordinances reg. illegal immigrants

  36. Worksite enforcement jumps in ‘06, ‘07

  37. No-match letter program: forthcoming safe harbor guidelines could have big impact • SSA sends no-match letters to employers with workers whose SS numbers don’t match names • Under original proposed rules, employers have to fire workers within 90 days • If caught, employers assumed to have ‘constructive knowledge’ and may face stiff penalties • If implemented without comprehensive reforms, no-match could impact millions of workers & grow shadow economy

  38. Where do we go from here? • Implications of no-match, interior enforcemnt • Relative demand for illegal workers falls • Segmented labor markets • More employment off-the-books; Decline in tax receipts • Lower wages, worse working conditions for illegals • Turnover, lost benefit coverage • Move from large to small employers • Greater inequality; slower assimilation • Reallocation of workers across states, localities • Less illegal immigration, all other things same

  39. Conclusion • Foreign-born important role in economic growth • Benefits of immigration extensive • Labor market impacts limited; fiscal impact sizable • Current policies & unintended consequences

  40. Where undocumented immigrants live Source: Pew Hispanic Center(2005)

More Related