130 likes | 540 Views
PARENTS INVOLVED IN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS v. SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1. Amanda Prince Stephanie Sequeira James Hastings. Legal Precedence. Argument for the petitioners Harry J.F. Korrell. Argument in support of Petitioners Solicitor General Paul D. Clement.
E N D
PARENTS INVOLVED IN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS v. SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 Amanda Prince Stephanie Sequeira James Hastings
Argument in support of PetitionersSolicitor General Paul D. Clement
What would you decide?
References • The oyez project at iitchicago-kent college of law. Grutter v. bollinger(2003, June 23). Retrieved march 2, 2012 from http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_02_241 • The oyez project at iitchicago-kent college of law. Gratz v. bollinger(2003, June 23). Retrieved march 2, 2012 from http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_02_516 • The oyez project at iitchicago-kent college of law. Parents involved in community schools v. seattle school district no. 1 (2007, June 28). Retrieved March 2, 2012 from http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2006/2006_05_908 • Parents involved in community schools V. Seattle school district no. 1: Voluntary racial integration in public schools. (2007). Harvard Law Review, 121(1), 98-103. Retrieved march 2, 2012 from EBSCOhost • Parents involved in community schools v. seattle school district no. 1 et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit, Retrieved march 2, 2012 from: http://www.supremecourt.gov