210 likes | 422 Views
Outline. Introduction Planar CPW ResonatorsDesignCharacterizationExperimental VerificationHF Materials characterizationA. Process FlowB. Parameter Extraction IV.Summary/Conclusion. Introduction. Goal:To reduce the cost of developing complex integrated systems, diagnostic methods are
E N D
1. Application of Uniplanar Structures for High Frequency Material Characterization Can Eyup Akgun1, Rhonda Franklin Drayton1,
Daniel I. Amey2, Tim P. Mobley2
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Union Street Southeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455 USA;
2. DuPont Microcircuit Materials, 14 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, North Carolina, 27709 USA.
2. Outline
3. Introduction
Goal:
To reduce the cost of developing complex integrated systems, diagnostic methods are needed to characterize the material system.
Objectives:
To implement in situ material characterization methods using modern design techniques
To investigate use of planar resonator structures that complement surface and embedded design methods
To extend the testable range of planar resonators to cover broadband frequencies up to 50 GHz frequencies.
4. Resonator Methods Resonators are used to extract dielectric constant and loss tangent in materials
Current Planar Approaches
20 GHz: Microstrip T-resonator (Amey and Curilla)
30 GHz: Coplanar Waveguide T-resonator with an open-stub (Peterson and Drayton)
40 GHz: Microstrip ring resonators
This work:
50 GHz: FGCPW with shorted T- and ring resonator
Resonator design depends on satisfying impedance requirements
5. Field Distribution After microstrip, CPWs have become another option in
MICs and MMICs and interconnect materials
CPW offers:
Less dependence on substrate height
Eeff less sensitive to impedance changes
Does not support parallel-plate modes, hence, less radiation loss than CPW
After microstrip, CPWs have become another option in
MICs and MMICs and interconnect materials
CPW offers:
Less dependence on substrate height
Eeff less sensitive to impedance changes
Does not support parallel-plate modes, hence, less radiation loss than CPW
6. Background: Finite Ground Coplanar Waveguide Design Design Guidelines
50 ohm line (S-g-Wg) (Agilent’s ADS LineCalc) with 3 mil gaps (g)
c/b ratio > 3 c/b ratio>3 important for approximating infinite ground casec/b ratio>3 important for approximating infinite ground case
7. Resonator Architectures T-resonator*
- Shorted FGCPW w/ single and double stubs
Ring resonator*
- FGCPW with coupled feeds
1) Conventional feed geometry
2) Inset feed geometry
3) Inset-T feed geometry
8. T-resonator design: FGCPW Approach Wire-bonds are important in suppressing odd-mode excitationWire-bonds are important in suppressing odd-mode excitation
9. Theoretical Characterization: Ansoft’s HFSS E-field Simulations
10. Measurement Method
11. Feedlines: FGCPW
Testing method: On-wafer probing using CPW probes with 250 µm pitch (middle of signal line to ground plane separation)
TRL calibration- reference plane is shifted to stub junction
12. Characterization: S-parameter response
13. Air-bridge Placement Effects: Balanced T-resonator
14. Ring resonator design: FGCPW Approach
15. FGCPW Ring resonator design-alternate feed designs
16. Ring resonator response
17. Material Characterization Application of Balanced T resonator toward extraction of material properties
er
Tan ?
18. Material characterization
19. Preliminary Findings
20. Summary/Conclusion FGCPW approach to Balanced T and T resonators demonstrate strong peaks up to 50 GHz.
Ring resonances up to 50 GHz are more sensitive to airbridge placement.
Dielectric constant values from Balanced T data are consistent with microstrip data.
Loss tangent extractions needs further experimental investigation.
21. Acknowledgements NSF Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers under grant #ECS-99906017
Dupont Educational Aid Grant
Any findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.