150 likes | 349 Views
Motivation. Improved performance from inherently high-efficiency cyclesCarnot cycle: impractically high compression ratios for even realistic temperature rangesTwo cycles with Carnot efficiency: Stirling cycle (isochoric heat regeneration/isothermal expansion and compression) : also impractical
E N D
1. Engines with no gaseous emission Fazle Hussain, Valery Zimin and Dhoorjaty Pradeep
fhussain@uh.edu
2. Motivation Improved performance from inherently high-efficiency cycles
Carnot cycle: impractically high compression ratios for even realistic temperature ranges
Two cycles with Carnot efficiency:
Stirling cycle (isochoric heat regeneration/isothermal expansion and compression) : also impractical due to very high pressures
Ericsson cycle (isobaric heat regeneration/isothermal expansion and compression) : modest pressure ratios deliver high efficiency; e.g. 87.5% with 2400 K.
3. Alleviating Pollution Hydrocarbon combustion ? H20 + CO2
Chief problem: NOx
Solution: combustion with pure Oxygen
Advantages:
No NOx
Temperature restricted by materials alone
Handling of exhausts far easier
(a) lower mass flow rate
(b) fewer chemical components
Cost:
Energy for air separation (not very large)
4. Key features Applications: local power plants, large vehicles, ships
5. Ericsson cycle
6. Power plant schematics
7. Two emisionless-engine designs:
Vortex Engine: for low-grade fuels (e.g. biomass)
Rotary Engine: for high-grade fuels (e.g. natural gas)
9. Key components of rotary engine Air separator
Isothermal liquid ring compressor
Ceramic heat exchanger & expander
High-temp isothermal combustor
CO2 liquefier
Water-spray cooler
10. Liquid-ring compressor
11. New combustor/expander
12. Expander operation
14. Power from combustion of 1kg/s CH4
at 87.5% thermodynamic efficiency: 43.75 MW
Amount of O2 consumed: 4 kg/s
Power consumed by N2 – O2 separator: 4 MW
Losses due to leakage in expander (estimated at 0.6%): 0.26MW
Loss due to heat flux through ceramic layers of expander (1.1%): 0.48MW
Losses due to leakage in compressor (estimated at 1.2%): 0.53 MW
Power consumed by CO2 liquefier (with recuperation) 0.15 MW
Estimated losses in heat regenerator: 1.8 MW
Other losses (frictional, incomplete combustion…): 0.85 MW
Total available work: 35.68 MW
Energy density of CH4 combustion: 50 MW
Overall plant efficiency: 71.4 % Energy balance
15. Experimental 10 kW set-up
16. Summary