1 / 13

Innovation in Latin-America: indicators and surveys

RICYT Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología. Innovation in Latin-America: indicators and surveys . Diana Suárez. Innovation Indicators for Latin America Workshop 19 March, 2009 Paris, France. The LA environment. Innovative features Low S&T expenditure

elliott
Download Presentation

Innovation in Latin-America: indicators and surveys

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RICYT Red Iberoamericana de Indicadoresde Ciencia y Tecnología Innovation in Latin-America: indicators and surveys Diana Suárez Innovation Indicators for Latin America Workshop19 March, 2009Paris, France

  2. The LA environment • Innovative features • Low S&T expenditure • Low endowment of qualified personnel • High public expenditure participation • Low patent rate • Context • Unstable macroeconomic environment • M-L & L Tech goods • Low external insertion ¿? “Developing countries”

  3. Methodological Approach Macroeconomy Trajectories Incentives Institutional framework _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Innovation Strategy Innovative behaviours Purpose Impact Obstacles Obstacles Objectives Innovation Activities Results Funding and information _ _ _ _ _ Innovation System

  4. Innovation in Latin-American firms What can we test? • Results of Innovation activities • Expenditure on Innovation activities • R&D human resources • Links, cooperation and sources of information • Obstacles

  5. How can we test?

  6. 1. Results • High product innovator rate but low rate of firms that applied for patents, • Developing countries: more process than product innovators.

  7. 2. Expenditure • Low innovation expenditure with high deviations • Concentrated on capital goods (then innovators)

  8. 3.Human resources in R&D • Even the firms with R&D expenditure and personnel present low rates of efforts. • R&D expenditure and human resources are not enough to understand innovative activities.

  9. 4. Innovative strategies • Capital goods and R&D are the most important activities in terms of expenditure, • But training and engineering and industrial design are also important in terms of impact of the capital good acquisition.

  10. 5.Links and cooperation

  11. 6. Obstacles

  12. Summary and conclusions • Innovative features • Low, concentrated and heterogeneous innovation expenditure • High rate of innovators but low scope of innovations • Low cooperation rates and contradictory numbers • Macroeconomic obstacles (uncertainty and funding) • Implications • Importance of the subject approach and the integrated analysis (IA expenditure vs. R&D) • Simple indicators are not enough (efforts, results, scope and impact) • Deeper analysis of cooperation and links with the NIS • Endogenous vs. exogenous obstacles

  13. www.ricyt.org dsuarez@ricyt.edu.ar

More Related