1 / 17

Persistence Diagram: Topological Characterization of Noise in Images

Persistence Diagram: Topological Characterization of Noise in Images. Moo K. Chung Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior University of Wisconsin-Madison www.stat.wisc.edu/~mchung. Brain Food Meeting November 5, 2008.

ellis
Download Presentation

Persistence Diagram: Topological Characterization of Noise in Images

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Persistence Diagram: Topological Characterization of Noise in Images Moo K. Chung Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior University of Wisconsin-Madison www.stat.wisc.edu/~mchung Brain Food Meeting November 5, 2008

  2. Acknowledgments Kim M. Dalton, Richard J. Davidson Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior University of Wisconsin-Madison Peter Kim University of Guelph CANADA

  3. Standard model on cortical thickness 6mm 0mm Gaussian  GLM

  4. Heat kernel smoothing makes data more Gaussian – central limit theorem QQ-plot 100 iterations Thickness 50 iterations Chung et al., 2005. NeuroImage

  5. Heat kernel smoothing widely used cortical data smoothing technique cortical curvatures (Luders, 2006; Gaser, 2006) cortical thickness (Luders, 2006; Bernal-Rusiel, 2008) Hippocampus (Shen, 2006; Zhu, 2007) Magnetoencephalography (MEG) (Han, 2007) functional-MRI (Hagler, 2006: Jo, 2007) General linear model (GLM) + random field theory Can we do data analysis in a really crazy way? Why? We may be able to detect some features that can’t be detected using the traditional approach.

  6. Persistence diagram Local max Local min A way to pair local min to local max in a nonlinear fashion.

  7. Persistence diagram Sublevel set Number of connected components Local min: Birth: Local max: Death: Pair the time of death with the time of the closest earlier birth

  8. PD-algorithm for pairing Set of local max Ordered local min For i from n to 1, let be the smallest of two adjacent local max iterate pair delete

  9. Rule for pairing local minimum to local maximum death 2 2 3 3 3 2 1 birth

  10. Persistence diagrams will show signal pattern

  11. Orthonormal basis in [0,1] Produces sine and cosine basis Removes sine basis

  12. High order derivatives are computed analytically without using finite difference more stable computing Measurement = f + noise

  13. Persistence diagram Red: local max Black: local min

  14. More complicated example black = top red = bottom Statistical analysis?

  15. Cortical thickness Flattening Weighted-SPHARM Chung et al., 2007, IEEE-TMI

  16. Signal difference noise red=autism black=control local min and max computation New inference & classification framework under development

  17. Thank you If you want to analyze your data this way, please talk to me 

More Related