210 likes | 383 Views
Cell Planning of 4G Cellular Networks. David Amzallag Computer Science Department, Technion. Joint work with Roee Engelberg (Technion), Seffi Naor (Microsoft Research) and Danny Raz (Technion). What is a cell planning?.
E N D
Cell Planning of 4G Cellular Networks David Amzallag Computer Science Department, Technion Joint work with Roee Engelberg (Technion), Seffi Naor (Microsoft Research) and Danny Raz (Technion)
What is a cell planning? • Planning a network of base stations (configurations) to provide the required coverage of the service area with respect to current and future traffic requirements, available capacities, interference, and the desired QoS • What is a typical outcome? • Coverage vs. capacity planning • Cell planning towards the fourth generation (4G)
Introducing the 4G cellular networks 100 Mbit/sec – 1Gbit/sec 15 Mbit/sec • High data rate (also in compare to HSDPA, in the downlink) + applications • System capacity is expected to be 10 times larger than current 3G systems • Drastic reduction in costs (1/10 to 1/100 per bit) • Cell planning with capacity limitations • “Base station on sprinkler” → high frequency → higher interference → small cells → larger number of base stations • OFDMA as the multiple access technique • Smart antennas and adaptive antennas • New approaches for optimization problems are required (e.g., radio access network design, satisfying mobile stations by more than one base station [IEEE 802.16e], automatic cell planning, self-configuring networks)
How to model the interference? • is the fraction of the capacity of a base station to a client • is the contribution of base station to client
How to compute ? • In general, • Since for relative small values of Two models of interference
A tale of two cell planning problems • A set of clients, each has a given demand • A set of possible base station configurations, each has a given capacityinstallationcost and a subsetof clients admissible to be covered by it • An interference matrix The budgeted cell planning problem (BCPP) asks for a subset of base stations whose cost does not exceed a given budget and the total number of (fully) satisfied clients is maximized. The minimum-cost cell planning problem (CPP) asks for a subset of base stations of minimum cost that satisfy at least of the demands of all the clients, All-or-Nothing coverage type constraint
Current cell planning solutions • Extensive study in the last years; Only special cases of the problem were investigated (almost all are minimum-cost type objectives) • Not supporting external impact matrix or interference • No capacity handling • In most cases, only meta-heuristics are used; No approximation algorithms • Not supporting budget constraint • Not supporting (fast) “special cases”
On the approximabaility of BCPP 2006 2007 1999 2004 Budgeted unique coverage [DFHS] All-or-nothing demand maximization [ABRS] Budgeted maximum coverage [KMN] Maximizing submodular functions [Sviridenko] approximable within Budgeted facility location In general, not approximable within [tight] For r-restricted version approximable within [tight] Budgeted cell planning Submodularity:
On the approximabaility of BCPP Here comes the bad news, as expected A Subset Sum instance The corresponding BCPP instance Conclusion. It is NP-hard to find a feasible solution to the budgeted cell planning problem
The k4k-budgeted cell planning problem • Adopting the k4k property: Every set of k base stations can fully satisfy at least k clients, for every integer k • Still NP-hard • Good news: No longer NP-hard to approximate • General idea behind our - approximation algorithm: • A best-of-two-candidates algorithm • How many clients are satisfying by more than one base station? • Covering clients by a single base station
How many clients are satisfied by more than one base station? When the corresponding graph is acyclic Base station Mobile client Leaves are the clients satisfiedby a single BS
How many clients are satisfied by more than one base station? When the corresponding graph contains cycles Edge weights are Client of demand of 7 Base station i’ gives client j’ 3 units Cycle canceling algorithm on BS with capacity of 10 Conclusion. (here is the set of clients that are satisfied by more than one base station)
Satisfying clients by a single base station The client assignment problem (CAP) • How many clients can be covered by a set of opened base stations? How many more can be covered if another base station is to be opened next? Formally, for a given set of BSs, let be the number of clients that can be covered, each by exactly one BS. • CAP’s resume: • The function is not submodular • CAP is NP-hard • Special case of the well-studied GAP (approximable within [FGMS, 2006])
Satisfying clients by a single base station The client assignment problem (CAP) • Algorithm 1. Pick a minimum-demand client Find the first BS in a given order that can cover If it exists – then assign to this BS; Otherwise, leave client uncovered • Properties: • Algorithm 1 is a ½-approximation algorithm to CAP • For every set of BSs and every base station • For every set of BSs and every base stations [Algorithm 1]
Satisfying clients by a single base station The budgeted maximum assignment problem (BMAP) • Find a subset of BSs whose cost does not exceed a given budget that maximizes • BMAP’s resume: • A generalization (capacitated) of the budgeted maximum coverage problem ([KMN, 1999]) • A greedy -approximation algorithm (maximizing ) [Algorithm 2]
A -approximation algorithm for the k4k-BCPP ← the output of BMAP algorithm on the same instance ← the maximum number of base stations that can be opened using budget ifthen Output and a set of clients that can be covered using the k4k-oracle else Output and the clients covered by CAP algorithm for these base stations [Algorithm 3]
Analysis Number of clients covered by Algorithm 3 Value of optimal solution for the BMAP instance property Cycle canceling
Open problems • Minimum-cost cell planning problem (CPP) • Special case: without interference • An - approximation algorithm • An - approximation algorithm (here ) • Good practical results in two sets of simulations • What about the general case? • Minimum-cost site-planning problem