1 / 19

National Health Bill – presentation to Portfolio Committee

National Health Bill – presentation to Portfolio Committee. Dr. Saadiq Kariem for ANC national health secretariat & committee. GENERAL COMMENTS. ANC Health Secretariat and Committee would like to fully support the Bill; and congratulate the Ministry and DOH on a comprehensive document.

eloised
Download Presentation

National Health Bill – presentation to Portfolio Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. National Health Bill – presentation to Portfolio Committee Dr. Saadiq Kariem for ANC national health secretariat & committee

  2. GENERAL COMMENTS • ANC Health Secretariat and Committee would like to fully support the Bill; and congratulate the Ministry and DOH on a comprehensive document. • The primary objective of the Bill: to establish a unitary health system is achieved • Co-operative governance between the various sections of the SA health system is achieved.

  3. Clear distinctions are presented between the national, provincial, local spheres of government • Bill clarifies the distinction between municipal health services & prov/national • Bear in mind health care principles of Alma Ata – move governance to lowest level possible

  4. Bill largely silent on regulation of private sector although other legislation exists ( eg MSA + related amendments ) • NHB deals with service provision/ dispensing vs. MSA deals with licensing – needs to be borne in mind • WHO Report of 2000: SA inability to control rampant private sector

  5. Support the UWC recommendations on equity in preamble: but also Need more equity in terms of health care financing between the public and private sectors • consider accepted principles of PHC: efficiency, effectiveness & WHO concepts of Goodness & Fairness

  6. We note the recommendations of COSATU / NEHAWU on issues of SHI / NHI in terms of the Mafikeng & Stellenbosch resolutions of the ANC; • This is a difficult issue but perhaps needs some directive in the Bill and follow the recommendations of the DOH on this matter for a 2 stage development of SHI first then move to NHI

  7. Chapter 2: Users & HC providers • Emergency treatment ( S 5 ): should this be defined? • Consent ( S 7): form should be specified ( written vs. oral ) • HC provision without consent: if Serious risk to public health – needs to be defined ito HR culture

  8. User participation ( S8) : difficult issue – need enabling mechanisms to realise this right for disempowered • Discharge reports ( S 10 ): should include inpts & outpts; should include basic Dx, Rx, Follow up • Dissemination of info ( S 12 ): support this but difficult from facility point; ? Operating schedules

  9. Confidentiality & Access to records: fully support • Complaints (S18): need an action plan / recourse to further action should complainant not be happy: difficult ? Timeframes • Responsibilities of users (S 19): expanded to include own responsibility for health

  10. Rights of health care providers not specifically mentioned at all – include :eg Protection against abuse of health workers? • Appropriate delegations ito S 97 to heads of institutions where appropriate

  11. Chapter 3: National Health • Fully support functions of the national DOH ( S 20 ) • Potential conflicts between national norms vs. provincial policies – National role vs. Schedule 4 competency • National Health Council to have more direct control over SAMHS? & thus use of military hospitals for public use • National Health Forum to meet annually ( not every 2 years )– do more than merely share information, could provide input to national policies/ implementation progress

  12. Chapter 4: Provincial Health • Support the implementation role of provincial DOH ( S 27 ) • Planning of private facilities in provinces to be carefully monitored – prevent excesses • Providing health services to prisons? Will have budgetary implications fro health • PH Council is weighted towards local municipalities & local government (S 28 ) • Any financial / other assistance received by provinces from foreign govts / donors to provinces must be sanctioned by national DOH to ensure equity and equitable access to $ and £

  13. Chapter 5: District Health System • Support the contiguous and continuous boundaries • Municipal health services in the Bill do not include some the preventive / elements – vs. principles of Alma Ata • Community Involvement in health – needs to be permeate all sections

  14. Chapter 6: Health establishments • Classification of facilities (S 40 ): should classification be linked to service delivery? • If so: need delinking of academic institutions from traditional tertiary support base • Certificate of Need ( S41 ): STRONGLY SUPPORT this – needs to be more restrictive of private establishments • Too restrictive of public facilities eg. Increase/ decrease in beds depended many operational factors • Establish appeals process in S 43 ito fairness of who gets the C. of Need

  15. Chapter 7: HR planning • (S53) AHC: as above: delinking tertiary teaching platform from tertiary service platform in line with WHO – support UWC changes to ( S53)& ( S 56 ) • Development of Finance & Personnel plans should be compulsory for all levels of health service • These should bear in mind national needs, normative standards, skills mix

  16. Governance issues ito the DHS must be resolved wrt conditions of service etc ( see also UWC presentation ) • Representation of academic institutions on national / provincial bodies resolved with DOE ( see also UCT presentation ) • Support the UWC position & move further to: active redistribution plan to ensure equity ito rural-urban divide; doctor-nurse; inter-provincial equity

  17. Absolute nursing crisis – need to expand the teaching units in SA; and ? • DIFFERENT PARADIGM IN SOUTH AFRICA: HR planning: • Development of a new cadre of health worker in SA – entry level health practitioners; a mid level health practitioner; nurses; doctors • Need to prevent the super-specialisation of doctors in favour of generalists who can be utilised at secondary & primary levels

  18. Chapter 8: blood & related products • Regulation of prices should be responsibility of National DOH and not NPO ( S 58 ) • Bl. Transfusion service must be national entity • Some form of regulation of number of facilities that can be designated – public & epidemiological needs

  19. Chapter 9 & 10 • National research structure should have some regulatory functions ito national research agenda that appropriate to SA demographics, BOD, epidemiological transitional profile • Support establishment of Office of Standards Compliance & regulatory role

More Related