290 likes | 447 Views
Non Unitary Random Walks. Philippe Jacquet INRIA-Polytechnique. In 1976…. Cadillac produced its last dinosaur…. Philippe was in INRIA for his first job creating the Algorithm project. Black Hole information loss paradox. Hawking’s information loss paradox claim (1976)
E N D
Non Unitary Random Walks Philippe Jacquet INRIA-Polytechnique
In 1976… Cadillac produced its last dinosaur…
Philippe was in INRIA for his first job creating the Algorithm project
Black Hole information loss paradox Hawking’s information loss paradox claim (1976) Black hole are not unitary and can destroye Information (hyper-computing, « P=NP », retro-information)
Unitary universe In an (honest) unitary universe All probabilities sums to one (!). Take a rabbit One month later it is either: 0.5 or 0.5 0.5+0.5=1
Unitary universe Wave function Ψis quantum physics Probabilistic interpretation Unitarity is a physical assumption
Non-unitary universe Take a and a black hole One month later either
In 2006 General motors produced its last dinosaur:
2006 Information loss paradox Hawking refutes his 1996 argument: Probability inside blackhole decays with blackhole lifetime, probability away from blackhole remains constant At the end only probability outside black hole remain: The rabbit never falls in black hole The black hole never forms
Information loss paradox refutation explained in modern economics The Rabbit has $1000 He invests $500 in a modern bank And keeps $500 in his pocket The modern bank loses 30% per year: At the end the rabbit has most of its remaining money in his pocket
Model refinement Investment portfolio: The rabbit put every year q fraction of its pocket money in the bank at time t, Let the money in bank BH Let the money outside the bank BH BH
non unitary Markovian system Matrix R is not unitary Probability vector if , then at time t most money is in the pocket if , then at time t most money is in the bank Consequence: The money can still be move inside the black hole bank Hawking refutation is refutable BH
Toward a refutation of Hawking refutation? • At every moment (discret) • the rabbit has a non zero probability to fall in the Black Hole (gravity) • if , then the rabit may never fall in the BH • if , then the rabbit eventually falls in the BH BH
Non unitarity Markov probability distorsion Black Hole with remaining lifetime t a at time 0 Let the sum of probabilities for the rabbit inside BH Let the sum of probabilities for the rabbit outside BH Apparent attraction probability : Apparent repulsion probability :
Apparent Black Hole repulsion The rabbit is repelled from Black Hole with apparent probability : if , then the repulsion is 100% if , then the repulsion is just increased
Non unitary random walk unbounded random walk sums of probabilities of state n for BH lifetime t … BH
« Flajoleries » (Nice maths) about non unitary random walks:Bivariate functional equation • With
Functional equation resolution • We have • But • With 0 1
Analytic resolution with Kernel • R(z,u) is analytic in the unit disk beyond • thus • And • Singular for and
Asymptotic behavior • Let If then main singularity on • relative repulsion • Uniform on all ranges
Large unitary default rate • When then main singularity at • The relative repulsion is neutral (flat)
Generalization • Non uniform random walks • Gravitational walks … BH
Non unitary Gravitational walks Repulsion point Apparent potential for lifetime=1, 400,800, 1600 Actual potential
2D non unitary gravitational walks Repulsion ring Apparent potential Actual potential