160 likes | 257 Views
Developing an Evaluation Strategy for the CETL in Creativity. Dr Paul Martin. What We Are. The University of Brighton Creativity Centre is half of ‘InQbate’ the Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) in Creativity.
E N D
Developing an Evaluation Strategy for the CETL in Creativity Dr Paul Martin
What We Are • The University of Brighton Creativity Centre is half of ‘InQbate’ the Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) in Creativity. • It is situated in the School of Environment and Technology behind Cockcroft Building
Our Mission • To enhance Creativity in Learning • To enhance Creativity in Facilitating Learning • To enhance Creativity in the Creative Process
Mission Achieved Through • The physical Creativity Centres activities • Projects in learning, facilitation and creativity + CDF projects • Developing a creative community • Working with InQbate and the wider CETL community • Researching aspects of creativity and disseminating findings
Context and Variables • Physical space • Virtual space • Personal space • Context of activity • Facilitation
Physical Space • The physical environment in which creativity takes place • Needs or preferences may vary with discipline eg; a studio for an artist or workshop for an engineer – or with personal likes or dislikes
Virtual Space • E-connections between individuals and groups with the centre and with the wider world community • Creation of national and international interest groups and communities
Personal Space • Shaped by a persons whole biography • By the individuals personal values, beliefs, perceptions, experiences • By cultural influences, family, friends, religion, society, gender, profession, trade, discipline etc. • By personal likes and dislikes
Context of Activity • Attitude towards type of engagement with creativity influenced by :- • Rationale eg; work, business, personal gain, personal enjoyment etc. • Who else is present eg; assessor, line manager, tutor, friends, work colleagues etc.
Facilitation • Transfer of knowledge to facilitation of meaning making / creativity • Traditional ‘Sage on the stage’ to ‘Guide on the side’ to ‘meddler in the middle’ or even ‘co-inquirer or creator’
Underpinning Philosophy of Research • Knowledge socially constructed • Constructivist / Interpretavist • Therefore a mostly qualitative approach • Findings not necessarily generaliseable to all situations
What We Want to Find Out • Need to refine questions about • Which types of space, furniture, environmental elements support creative process (cp) • Which technologies support the cp • Which types of facilitation support the cp
Issues • How to carry out worthwhile research in an area of such wide, interactive and complex variables.
Initial Research Methods • Time line observations • Facilitator / teacher evaluation forms • Centre feedback form • Booking / enquiry form info plus notes by centre staff
2nd Phase Research Methods • Initial research methods as appropriate plus • Learner / delegate evaluation forms covering their whole experience • Focus groups • Interviews with facilitators and learners • Filmed sessions
Creative Community • If you are interested in joining us to research in this field and help create a community of research into creativity please contact me @ • (p.r.martin@brighton.ac.uk)