1 / 3

Differences between Research and Evaluation (Smith, M. and Glass, G. (1987) Research and Evaluation in the Social Scien

Differences between Research and Evaluation (Smith, M. and Glass, G. (1987) Research and Evaluation in the Social Sciences . New Jersey: Prentice Hall). The intents and purposes of the investigation; The scope of the investigation; Values in the investigation; The origins of the study;

elu
Download Presentation

Differences between Research and Evaluation (Smith, M. and Glass, G. (1987) Research and Evaluation in the Social Scien

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Differences between Research and Evaluation(Smith, M. and Glass, G. (1987) Research and Evaluation in the Social Sciences. New Jersey: Prentice Hall). • The intents and purposes of the investigation; • The scope of the investigation; • Values in the investigation; • The origins of the study; • The uses of the study; • The timeliness of the study; • Criteria for judging the study; • The agendas of the study.

  2. Differences between Research and Evaluation(Norris, N. (1990) Understanding Educational Evaluation. London: Kogan Page). • The motivation of the enquirer; • The objectives of the research; • Laws versus description; • The role of explanation; • The autonomy of the enquiry;

  3. Differences between Research and Evaluation • Properties of the phenomena that are assessed; • Universality of the phenomena studied; • Salience of the value question; • Investigative techniques; • Criteria for assessing the activity; • Disciplinary base.

More Related