1 / 40

THE NEEDS OF HADRONTHERAPY IN SPAIN

THE NEEDS OF HADRONTHERAPY IN SPAIN. Ignacio Petschen Verdaguer IFIMED 2009. HADRONTHERAPY. Therapeutic Window: Favorable. tumor control. toxicity. 90%. PROBABILITY. 5%. DOSE OF RADIATION. H Cárdenas courtesy. HADRONTHERAPY. Therapeutic Window: Unfavorable. tumor control. toxicity.

elvis-mccormick
Download Presentation

THE NEEDS OF HADRONTHERAPY IN SPAIN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE NEEDS OF HADRONTHERAPY IN SPAIN Ignacio Petschen Verdaguer IFIMED 2009

  2. HADRONTHERAPY Therapeutic Window: Favorable tumor control toxicity 90% PROBABILITY 5% DOSE OF RADIATION H Cárdenas courtesy

  3. HADRONTHERAPY Therapeutic Window: Unfavorable tumor control toxicity 90% PROBABILITY 50% DOSE OF RADIATION H Cárdenas courtesy

  4. HADRONTHERAPY Therapeutic Window: Effect of reducing Volume of Normal Tissue tumor control toxicity 90% V1 V2 PROBABILITY 50% V2 < V1 5% DOSE OF RADIATION H Cárdenas courtesy

  5. Mendenhall courtesy

  6. AK Lee courtesy MD Anderson CC

  7. AK Lee courtesy MD Anderson CC

  8. 1862-1942

  9. Combs courtesy

  10. HADROTHERAPY: RBE PROTONS: Between 0,9 y 1,3 (average: 1,1) “plateau”: 0,9-1 “Bragg peak”: 1,2-1,3 CARBON IONS: Between 2 and 3 An increase of apoptosis induction, mainly at Bragg peak level, has been shown, for protons and ions.

  11. Combs courtesy

  12. HADRONTHERAPY: CARBON IONS - Reduction in the OER. - Lesser influence of repair phenomena. - Reduction of the differences in RS related to cell cycle position.

  13. HADRONTHERAPY: CARBON IONS Malignant tumors: -Well differenciated -Slowly growing -Hypoxic (RR) -Slowly cell cycle redistribution -repair-proficient tumors

  14. HADRONTHERAPY: IMAGE Only possible if modern image techniques are available

  15. Vikram courtesy (NCI)

  16. HADRONTHERAPY: IMAGE Ling et al. IJROBP, 47: 551 (2000)

  17. HADRONTHERAPY: CONFORMALITY Ling et al. IJROBP, 47: 551 (2000)

  18. HADRONTHERAPY • POTENTIALS: • High conformal dose distribution • Higher target dose • Steepest dose gradients between PTVs and PRVs • Reduction of patient integral dose • Increase RBE (ions) AIMS: -Tumor dose intensification (Increase of tumor control) -Low doses to the ORs and non involved tissue (less toxicity) -Higher survival rates -Better outcome in patients with RR-tumors (ions) -Reduction of RT-fractions (less treatment days)

  19. HADRONTHERAPYTHE TERA PROJECT • POTENTIAL INDICATIONS FOR PROTONTHERAPY • Category A: • Closenesstohighlycriticalstructures • - Onlywaytoadminister a radical dosewithoutproducing • serioussideeffects

  20. HADRONTHERAPYTHE TERA PROJECT • POTENTIAL INDICATIONS FOR PROTONTHERAPY • Tumoursbelongingcategory A: • Uveal melanoma • Base of skullchordoma and chondrosarcoma • Spinal and paraspinaltumours • Parasellarmeningioma • Opticalnerve glioma • Acousticnerveschwanoma

  21. HADRONTHERAPY: PROTONSUVEALMELANOMA: RESULTS CENTER 5 y. local control 5 y. ocular retention MGH 96% 84% PSI 94,8%· 86%· CP Niza 89% 88% CP Orsay 97% 92% Berlin 95,5%·· 87,5·· PC Clatterbridge 96,5% 90,6% Useful vision in > 50% · 10 years ··3 years

  22. HADRONTHERAPY: PROTONS BASE SKULL CHORDOMAS AND CHONDROSA. RESULTS CHORDOMASCHONDROSA. CENTER 5 y. local control 5 y. local control MGH 73 % 99 % CPULL 59 % 75 % CP Orsay 71 % 85 %

  23. HADRONTHERAPYTHE TERA PROJECT • POTENTIAL INDICATIONS FOR PROTONTHERAPY • Category B : • Prevalently local evolution • - LowRadiosensitivity

  24. HADRONTHERAPYTHE TERA PROJECT • POTENTIAL INDICATIONS FOR PROTONTHERAPY • Tumoursbelongingtocategory B : • Prostaticadenocarcinoma • Retroperitoneal sarcoma • Salivaryglandtumours • Uterinecervixcancer (IIB bulkyor IIIB) • Undiff. tumours of thethyroidgland

  25. HADRONTHERAPYTHE TERA PROJECT • POTENTIAL INDICATIONS FOR PROTONTHERAPY • Category C : • Protons as “boost” in a restrictedvolume • -Irradiationvolumewith a large safety margin • - Selectionbasedontheinitial response tophotonirradiation

  26. HADRONTHERAPYTHE TERA PROJECT • POTENTIAL INDICATIONS FOR PROTONTHERAPY • Tumoursbelongingtocategory C : • Head and neckcancer • Low grade glioma • Malignantthymoma • Biliarytracttumours • Somelungtumours (NSCLC) • Oesophagustumours • Somepediatrictumours (CNS, sarcoma)

  27. HADRONTHERAPYTHE TERA PROJECT • POTENTIAL INDICATIONS FOR PROTONTHERAPY • Category D : • Tu. withlocallyadvancedconditions and unfavourable prognosis • -Expectingsurvivalwith heavy symptomatology • - Paliationwithphotonsoftenunsatisfactory

  28. HADRONTHERAPYTHE TERA PROJECT • POTENTIAL INDICATIONS FOR PROTONTHERAPY • Tumorsbelongingtocategory D : • Pancreascancer • High grade glioma • Paraaorticmetastaticadenopathies • Pelvicrecurrences in previouslytreatedareas • Rhinopharingealrecurrences in previouslyirradiatedareas • isolatedbrainmetastasis

  29. HADRONTHERAPY: PROTONS PATIENTS CALCULATION • According to an Italian epidemiological study (reduction to ¾ = 45/60). • Patients with elective indications for protontherapy (cat.A) • TUMOR TYPES: RT pat/y %prot Pat prot/y • Uveal melanoma . 232 100% 232 • -Chordomas 35 100% 35 • -Chondrosarcomas (head,trunk) 68 100% 68 • -Meningiomas base of the skull 188 50% 94 • Naso-etmoidal/paranasal tumors 105 100% 105 • CNS Schwanoma 225 15% 34 • Hypophysis adenoma 562 10% 56 • Pediatric solid tumors 727 15% 109 • TOTAL 2.142 34% 733 Krengly and Orecchia. Radiother Oncol, 73, S21-23 (2004)-modif-

  30. RT-PROTONS: PATIENTSCALCULATION • AccordingtoanItalianepidemiologicalstudy (reductionto ¾ = 45/60). • Patientstobeincluded in clinicaltrials (cat B) • TUMOR TYPES: RT pat/y %Prot Pat prot/y • -Brain gliomas 1.950 20% 390 • -Prostate carcinoma 16.750 25% 4.188 • -Pancreatic carcinoma 6.788 20% 1.357 • -NSCLC 23.250 5% 1.162 • -Biliarytracttumors 3.225 10% 322 • -Bladder carcinoma 12.713 10% 1.271 • -Head and Necktumors 5.085 15% 763 • -Brain gliomas 1.950 20% 390 • -Esophageal carcinoma 2.130 5% 106 • Undiff. thyroidcancer 75 50% 37 • Uterinecervixcancer 2.243 20% 448 • Hepaticcancer 10.005 10% 1.000 • -Pelvicrecurrence >375 50% >190 • TOTAL >86.539 13% >11.624

  31. HADRONTHERAPY: C-IONS PATIENTS CALCULATION • According to an Italian epidemiological study (reduction to ¾ = 45/60). • Patients elegible for C-ions therapy • TUMOR TYPES: RT pat/y %prot Pat prot/y • Salivary glands tumours 465 50% 232 • -ENT mucosal melanoma 23 100% 23 • -Bone sarcoma 390 10% 39 • Soft tissue sarcoma 1.020 10% 102 • NSC Lung cancer 23.250 5% 1.162 • Hepatocelular carcinoma 3.750 10% 37 • Prostata carcinoma 16.748 5% 837 • TOTAL 45.646 5,5% 2.432 Krengly and Orecchia. Radiother Oncol, 73, S21-23 (2004)-modif-

  32. HADRONTHERAPY: PATIENTSCALCULATION POTENTIAL RECRUITMENT FOR HADRONTHERAPY IN FRANCE “ One-daysurvey” in 5 radiationtherapydepartments: InstitutionsNr pat./dayNrpot. H-indications/dayAnnualrecruit. Besançon 115 13 130 Lyon Bérard 152 13 130 Pierre Benite 100 26 260 Dijon 83 11 110 Grenoble 82 14 140 Total 532 77 (14,5%) 770 RT treatments/year: 160.000 Potentialindicationsforhadrontherapy: 23.000 Baron et al. Radiother Oncol, 73, S 15-17 (2004)-modif-

  33. HADRONONTHERAPY: PATIENTS CALCULATION POTENTIAL RECRUITMENT FOR HADRONTHERAPY IN AUSTRIA “Nationwidesurvey” in 12 austrianradiationtherapydepartments. Accordingtothecriteriafrom 5 EuropeanUniversityHospitalsinvolved in hadronprojects (Heidelberg, Milan, Lyon, Vienna and Innsbruck) Inhabitants Austria: 8.000.000 New cancerpatients/year: 36.500 RT-treatments/year: 15.141 Potentialindicationsforhadrontherapy/year: 2.044 (13,5% RT) Mayer et al. Radiother Oncol, 73, S 24-28 (2004)-modif-

  34. HADRONONTHERAPY: PATIENTS CALCULATION CONCLUSIONS ACCORDING EXPERTGROUP FROM ITALY, GERMANY, FRANCE AND AUSTRIA (% RTpatients who need HT): Main indications for protons 1% Indications for protons which require clinical trials 12% Indications for C-ions which require clinical trials 3% Amaldi and Kraft. Rep Prog Phis, 10, 478-85 (2005)

  35. HADRONTHERAPY: PATIENTS CALCULATION Cancer incidence rate in Spain 385 Annual cancer incidence in Spain 173.250 Nr of cancer patients elegible for RT in Spain (50%) 86.625 Nr of cancer patients undergoing RT in Spain (43%) 74.500 Nr of RT patients elegible for PT in Spain (13%) 9.750 Nr of RT patients elegible for C-ions in Spain (3%) 2.250

  36. HADRONTHERAPY: PATIENTS CALCULATION Averagetime per fraction: 20’ (3 fr/h) Double shift : 2x7h: 14h/day Nr of patients/day for PTU: 42 fr/day 5 days/week: 250 treatment days/year Output for PTU: 10.500 fr/year

  37. HADRONTHERAPY: PATIENTS CALCULATION Average Nr fractions/patient (for protons): 12· Average Nr fractions/patient (for C-ions): 8· Nr patients/year treated /PTU (for protons) 875 Nr patients/year treated /PTU (for C-ions) 1.300 Nr PTU needed in Spain 11-12 Nr C-ionsTU needed in Spain 2 ·Krengly and Orecchia. Radiother Oncol, 73, S21-23 (2004)

  38. HADRONTHERAPY: PROTONSSOME CONCLUSIONS • Advantages due mainly to excellent dose distribution. • -Main indications in recognized tumor types and locations (> 10%). • -Need to have at least one protonterapy center in Spain: Valencia • -Need to perform fase II y III trials comparing protons with photons. • -Further increase of protontherapy facilities to cover the spanish needs.

  39. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATENTION Delaney courtesy

More Related