130 likes | 257 Views
WRA 150: Evolution of American thought. THURSDAY, OCT. 2, 2013. AGENDA. Housekeeping Building a rubric Peer Review What’s next. GOALS FOR TODAY. Work together to create a rubric that will be used to evaluate your papers
E N D
WRA 150: Evolution of American thought THURSDAY, OCT. 2, 2013
AGENDA • Housekeeping • Building a rubric • Peer Review • What’s next
GOALS FOR TODAY • Work together to create a rubric that will be used to evaluate your papers • Creating transparency about what is asked and expected of you, how to achieve these expectations, and what is valued in a paper like this • Continue getting/giving feedback from/to your fellow classmates on your papers through peer review. • To leave class with a clear plan for writing your final drafts.
CREATING A RUBRIC • Because the last paper was not evaluated at such a granular level (i.e. I was mainly concerned with abstract things arrangement and voice), this paper will be a little more structured in terms of assessment • The goal of a well-constructed rubric is to identify the criteria for a successful performance and describes the qualities of strong, adequate, and weak performances. • Collaborating together on the rubric can help guide your writing process as you move forward.
CREATING A RUBRIC • With that in mind, what sorts of things do you think this paper should be evaluated on? • What categories should be represented on the rubric? • Basically, what are the essential elements that must be present in the paper to ensure that it is high in quality? • Not only that, but how are they being characterized? What makes these strong, weak, etc? • How many categories do we want to be assessed? • Things like: Focus/purpose, development/process, arrangement, audience, language, style • What do these things actually mean when being assessed?
THINGS WE NEED TO CONSIDER • What are the categories • How should these categories be weighted? • What is the most important element? How many points will it be worth? • What is our scale? • Ex. Grades: A-F; Levels: strong, okay, shitty; ETC. • How do we describe the performance of each category/criteria?
RUBRIC • Having discussed what makes a strong paper and outlining the categories that you guys think are the most important for assessment should help guide you as you engage in…
PEER REVIEW • Just like last time, take some time to jot down two to three things that you specifically want your peer reviewers to focus on • This will help make the peer review useful for you in very pointed ways • Think about the things we just talked about while creating the rubric.
PEER REVIEW • Get into groups of three and exchange papers • Take 15-20 minutes to reading through each paper carefully (twice, if necessary) taking notes and paying special attention to the areas of concern that the writer already outlined. • After everyone is finished reading and reviewing each paper in the group, take 10 or so minutes to discuss—as a group—one paper at a time. • Again, use the rubric we made as talking points.
TO SUM UP • Hopefully building the rubric together helps you better understand what is expected of you and how to achieve the benchmarks we as a group came up with • Coupled with the peer review, hopefully you leave class with a clear writing agenda for your final drafts. • That’s all
FOR NEXT CLASS • We will be talking about the Project 3: the Disciplinary Literacies paper • Read: • “Blue Collar Brilliance” by Mike Rose (on course website)