1 / 19

Graphical Models for Mobile Robot Localization

Graphical Models for Mobile Robot Localization. Shuang Wu. Global Localization. In an occupancy map, estimate the pose of the robot X = <x,y, θ>. (0,0). occupied. free. θ. The inputs. Laser readings z t = {r 1 ,r 2 … r 180 } Odometer reading a t = {d,theta}

ely
Download Presentation

Graphical Models for Mobile Robot Localization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Graphical Models for Mobile Robot Localization Shuang Wu

  2. Global Localization • In an occupancy map, estimate the pose of the robot X = <x,y,θ> (0,0) occupied free θ

  3. The inputs • Laser readings zt = {r1,r2…r180} • Odometer reading at = {d,theta} • Prior sample set, Bel(X0)= <Xi,wi>, n possible pose

  4. prediction update Could use Bayes Filter

  5. Recursive Bayes Filter normalizing constant action model sensor model

  6. <x,y,θ>t <x’,y’,θ’>t+1 odometer reading New Positions:Generate X’ according to P(X’|X,a) p(X’|X,a) ~ X’ + N(0,Σd) + N(0, Σθ) at = (1, 45˚)

  7. p(z|X’) = Sensor model • weight w’ by p(z|X’) w,<x’,y’,θ’>t+1 p(z|X’)*w, <x’,y’,θ’>t+1 p(z|X’) = N(d,Σs), where Σs is the measure of noise in the laser readings d is the distance to the closest obstacle zt = (1, 1.41,…,3)

  8. Likelihood weighted sampling Samples are drawn from the target distribution Importance Sampling Samples are drawn from a proposal distribution(g) Re-weight samples to account for the difference between the proposal and target distribution proposal target Sampling Key: represent belief states by set of weighted samples g 0, f 0

  9. Resampling • Reason: Waste of CPU time if we keep propagating particles that have 0 weight. • Goal: Minimize variance of the importance weights

  10. Rao-Blackwell Theorem • Particle Filters approximate any distribution independent of size of state space. The complexity of the standard PF algorithm is O(N). • Motivation: In very high-dimensional spaces, a large number of particles is needed to represent the posterior • Solution: Reduce size of state space by marginalizing out some of the variables.

  11. Rao-Blackwellised • Step1. Divide the set of variables into sets R and L where R = set of sampled variables and L = remaining variables in the DBN at time t. • Choice of RB variables: nodes that have no parents in the current time slice or have parents that are already in R. Keep growing R until the remaining variables can be updated exactly. • Step2. Sample the set of variables Rt from Rt-1 using standard PF • Step3. Compute the remain variables analytically.

  12. RBPF Prediction: • Now the particle set is represented by Update: Proposal distribution: Importance weights

  13. Implementation Implementation Summary: • Used Rao-Blackwellised particle filtering to solve localization problem. • Able to localize within about 4cm (using a 20 x 20 x 10 resolution grid). • Implementation is written in Java. • Takes 16 seconds on my 2.4 GHz 512MB Windows XP machine for data set 1 (not counting loading data and ray tracing pre-computations). • Ray tracing takes 8 seconds, plus 14 seconds for pre-computing grid ranges.

  14. Results(Implemented in Java)

  15. Step 110

  16. Step 565

  17. Step 580

  18. End of Forward Run

  19. The End

More Related