1 / 12

A Regulator’s Perspective on ERM

A Regulator’s Perspective on ERM. CAS / SOA ERM Symposium Washington, July 29, 2003 Allan Brender. Background on OSFI. Federal supervisor and regulator Integrated - cover insurers and deposit takers Protect rights of depositors and policyholders Organized by function, not by industry

eman
Download Presentation

A Regulator’s Perspective on ERM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Regulator’s Perspective on ERM CAS / SOA ERM Symposium Washington, July 29, 2003 Allan Brender

  2. Background on OSFI • Federal supervisor and regulator • Integrated - cover insurers and deposit takers • Protect rights of depositors and policyholders • Organized by function, not by industry • Cross-cultural fertilization

  3. OSFI’s Mandate • Determine whether FI’s are in sound financial condition and in compliance • Advise management and directors if the FI is not in sound financial condition or in compliance • Monitor / evaluate sectoral events that may have a negative impact on financial condition • Promote the adoption by FI’s of policies and procedures to control and manage risk

  4. OSFI’s Mandate Carry out regulation and supervision while recognizing that • Boards of directors are responsible for management of the FI • FI’s operate in a competitive environment that necessitates the management of risk • FI’s can experience financial difficulties that can lead to their failure

  5. Supervisory Framework • Identify significant activities • Evaluate inherent risk in each activity • Evaluate the quality of risk management for each risk • Rate net risk; determine risk direction

  6. Supervisory Framework • Consider capital and quality of earnings • Determine a composite rating www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca/eng/documents/practices/docs/framew_e.pdf

  7. RM in Banking • Emerged from Basel Accord • Relationship between RM and capital • Interaction of RM and capital requirements • RM was accepted as something more than a regulatory requirement • RM became an important part of banking culture

  8. RM in Insurance • Emerging slowly • Insurers and actuaries are sensitive to others’ risks • Insurers concentrate on a few specific risks of their own • They miss out on many others • Valuation models • Product design • Time scale is a factor • A significant culture change is required

  9. Appointed Actuary or CRO ? • Role of the AA • Role of the CRO • Who has the broader horizon? • Whistle blowing

  10. Financial Condition Reporting • DST, DCAT, DFCA, DFA, … • AA in Canada is required to prepare an annual financial condition report using DCAT • Aimed at directors and senior management • OSFI receives a copy • DCAT as a risk management exercise

  11. ERM in Practice • Solid corporate governance • Well-documented policies, procedures, and limits • Appropriate monitoring and reporting • Willingness to take necessary action

  12. www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca Thank you!

More Related