1 / 21

Brief Introduction to (VUV/)Soft X-ray FELs

ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources March 5 th -9 th , 2012 Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Newport News, VA. Brief Introduction to (VUV/)Soft X-ray FELs. R. P. Walker Diamond Light Source, UK. Status of VUV/Soft X-ray FELs. Working definition:

eman
Download Presentation

Brief Introduction to (VUV/)Soft X-ray FELs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ICFA Workshop on Future Light SourcesMarch 5th-9th, 2012Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityNewport News, VA Brief Introduction to (VUV/)Soft X-ray FELs R. P. Walker Diamond Light Source, UK

  2. Status of VUV/Soft X-ray FELs Working definition: VUV: ~200 nm – ~20 nm (5 eV – 50 eV) Soft X-ray: ~20 nm – ~1 nm (50 eV – 1 keV) • Operating • FLASH (Germany) • - so far the only operating soft X-ray User facility • FERMI@ELETTRA (Italy) • - call for proposals issued; 1st external users later this year • Planned • NGLS (US): 0.28 – 1.2 keV • WiFEL (US): 5 – 900 eV • SPARX-FEL (Italy) : 30 eV – 2 keV • JLAB VUV FEL (JLAMP) (US): 600 MeVcwrecirculatinglinac, oscillator FEL 10-100 eV

  3. Note that X-ray FEL facilities may also operate in the soft X-ray range, or contain specific soft-X-ray FELs e.g. • LCLS: has operated down to 400 eV • European XFEL SASE3: 4.7 nm – 0.4 nm (260 eV to 3 keV) • SwissFEL “Athos” at 2.4/3.1 GeV: 7 – 0.7 nm, variable polarization, HHG seeding + single-stage HGHG (or other scheme) • PAL-XFEL SXFEL1 at 3 GeV: 1-10 nm

  4. Many (X)FEL test facilities are in the soft X-ray range • Operating • SCSS (Japan): 250 MeV • SPARC (Italy): 200 MeV • Shanghai Deep-UV FEL (SDUV): 150 MeV • Construction • Shanghai Soft X-ray FEL (SXFEL) • approved in Feb. 2011; construction started early 2012 • 840 MeV normal conducting S-band + C-band linac • possible future upgrade to 1.3 GeV for soft X-ray user facility • Planned • CLARA (UK) • LUNEX5 (France) See separate session on test facilities

  5. Not to mention several projects that have • “fallen by the wayside ..” • 4GLS • BESSY FEL • LUX • Arc-en-ciel • NLS … technically not dead, just not proceeding at the moment .. Fallen by the Wayside, E.Bundy, 1886.

  6. FLASH Radiation Parameters 2011 Wavelength range (fundamental) 4.1 – 45 nm Average single pulse energy 10 – 400 μJ Pulse duration (FWHM) 50 – 200 fs Peak power 1 – 3 GW Average power (example for 3000 pulses/sec) ~ 300 mW Spectral width (FWHM) ~ 0.7 - 2 % Average Brilliance 1017 – 1021 * Peak Brilliance 1029 – 1031 * * photons/s/mrad2/mm2/0.1%bw • > 150 publications on photon science, many in high impact journals • 3740 hours of SASE delivery Sep. 2010 – Sep. 2011 • Accelerator up-time ~ 96% • SASE delivery to experiments ~ 75% (rest is tuning, set-up etc.)

  7. FLASH-II • Construction has started • Commissioning May 2013 • SASE: 4-60 nm • HHG seeded: 10-40 nm (at 100 kHz)

  8. FERMI@Elettra S-band linac 1.2 GeV (later 1.5 GeV) FEL-1: HGHG down to 10nm Status: operating 20-65 nm FEL2: two stage HGHG with fresh bunch technique, to 4 nm (1.5 GeV) Status: install & commission in 2012

  9. FERMI@ELETTRA Photon Beam Parameters to date Photon energy range 19‐62 eV (20‐65 nm) Tunability ~ 5% Polarization LV/LO/LC/RC Energy/pulse 20‐ 30 μJ Estimated pulse length <150 fs Repetition rate 10 Hz FEL mode TEM00 FEL bandwidth 30‐90 meV n(FWHM) FEL bandwidth ΔE/E= 6x10‐4 (rms) Photon energy fluctuations ~1.1 meV (rms) FEL bandwidth fluctuations ~ 3% (rms) http://www.elettra.trieste.it/FERMI/index.php?n=Main.Parameter

  10. Superconducting L- band electron linear accelerator Undulators 2.2 GeV 1.7 GeV Experimental Areas SRF gun Bunch compressors Beam switchyard with RF separators Monochromators 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 m Wisconsin FEL (WiFEL) • 2.2 GeV CW SC linac with RF separation for many high-rep-rate beamlines • Low charge bunches (200 pC) • Seeding with High Harmonic Generation sources • Cascaded harmonic generation without “fresh bunch” • Development of a superconducting cw 200MHz electron gun is underway

  11. NGLS High rep. rate soft X-ray FEL facility; 2.4 GeV cw s/c linac • Up to 106 pulses per second • Seeded • Ultrashort pulses from 250 as – 250fs • Narrow energy bandwidth to 50 meV • Adjustable photon energy from 280 eV – 1.2 keV • Polarization control 3 initialbeamlines: ≤1 μs ~10–100 fs 10 μs Seeded or self-seeded SASE or self-seeded 2 color seeded 5 – 250 fs 0.25 – 25fs 5 – 150 fs • Up to 100 kHz • High resolution • ~Time-bandwidth limited • 1011 – 1012 photons/pulse • 10-3 – 5x10-5 ∆w/w • Highest rep rate, MHz • High flux • 1011 - 1012 photon/pulse • 100 W • Up to 100 kHz • Ultra-fast • 250 as pulses • Two color • 108 ph/pulse • Diffractive imaging(at highest rate) • Photon correlationspectroscopy • High-resolution spectroscopy • Diffractive imaging (with harmonics) • MultidimensionalX-ray spectroscopy

  12. NGLS • LBNL submitted a proposal to DoE in December 2010 • DOE approved CD-0: “Mission Need” for a Next Generation Light Source in April 2011 • Currently no DOE budget to pursue a Project • LBNL is • Performing Accelerator and Detector R&D • Performing feasibility studies which will inform a Conceptual Design

  13. Users’ Requirements high pulse energy transverse coherence fs pulses (or less) polarization control easy tunability multiple, simultaneous users high repetition rate regularly spaced pulses THz radiation in synchronism with FEL two-colour FEL pulses longitudinal coherence / pulse uniformity* high degree of amplitude stability* small linewidth* precise synchronism with lasers for pump-probe expts.

  14. Users’ Requirements high pulse energy transverse coherence fs pulses (or less) polarization control easy tunability multiple, simultaneous users high repetition rate regularly spaced pulses THz radiation in synchronism with FEL two-colour FEL pulses longitudinal coherence / pulse uniformity* high degree of amplitude stability* small linewidth* precise synchronism with lasers for pump-probe expts. Most requirements not specific to soft X-rays … Especially for soft-X-ray FELs (?) .. that was the view, but now XFEL users are starting to demand such properties

  15. Users’ Requirements high pulse energy transverse coherence fs pulses (or less) polarization control easy tunability multiple, simultaneous users high repetition rate regularly spaced pulses THz radiation in synchronism with FEL two-colour FEL pulses longitudinal coherence / pulse uniformity* high degree of amplitude stability* small linewidth* precise synchronism with lasers for pump-probe expts. SASE Seeded * or oscillator

  16. Users’ Requirements high pulse energy transverse coherence fs pulses (or less) ……………………………….many different schemes polarization control …………… APPLE/DELTA/crossed undulator etc. easy tunability …………………………………… variable gap undulator multiple, simultaneous users ………… electron switchyard schemes high repetition rate ………………………………… superconducting RF regularly spaced pulses ………………………. cw superconducting RF THz radiation in synchronism with FEL ……………… (pre)/afterburner two-colour FEL pulses ………………………………..… various schemes longitudinal coherence / pulse uniformity* high degree of amplitude stability* small linewidth* precise synchronism with lasers for pump-probe expts.

  17. Technical Issues • Seeding: • - laser sources for shorter wavelength and higher rep. rate • - seeding / modulation / harmonic generation schemes • - modelling thereof • Electron beam optimisation: • Bunch compression – how many? • Seeded FELs in particular require: • - e- pulse shape control: flat slice parameters  flat gain length over length of seed pulse + timing jitter; even more for “fresh-bunch” schemes • - timing jitter reduction due to linac phase and voltage fluctuations •  careful optimisation of gun + linac parameters to meet these requirements

  18. Technical Issues • Electron sources • - development of a low emittance, high rep rate injector, is still an an area of active R&D (see session on Electron Sources) • Electron beam switching schemes for multiple FELs • - magnetic or RF separation ? tolerances … • Diagnostics (electron & photon) for low charge, short pulses

  19. In addition, a big issue is COSTparticularly for high repetition rate FELs, SCRF technology, especially cw SCRF, is very expensive: cw SCRF (NLS, NGLS, WiFEL) Science driven “Cost” pulsed SCRF (FLASH, EXFEL) ~ 1 kHz NCRF currently no demand, but is there a “niche” ? ~ 100 Hz NCRF (LCLS, SACLA, PAL XFEL, SwissFEL etc.) “Rep. rate”

  20. Given the wavelength range and type of machine, how to reduce costs ? …… reduce electron beam energy BUT: Science driven • Shorter period undulators •  higher field • new designs, materials …SCUs ? •  lower gap – what really is the limit ?? • Higher harmonics • - schemes to enhance harmonic output (e.g. phase jumps) • - seeding and harmonic generation schemes • Ultra-low emittance guns • - “conventional” guns at low charge • - novel electron sources Could be an interesting combination.. But reduced pulse energy ..

  21. Thanks for your attention

More Related