110 likes | 129 Views
Study reviews medicine use in children under 5 in primary care settings in developing countries from 1990-2009. Key findings, interventions, and recommendations to improve childhood infection treatment.
E N D
Medicines use in children under 5: Twenty years of practice patterns and intervention effects Medicines use in children under 5 years primary care in developing and transitional countriesResults from studies reported between 1990-2009 Kathleen Holloway, Verica Ivanovska, Dennis Ross-Degnan
Background • Common childhood infections still a major avoidable cause of under 5 mortality • Many efforts made to improve the treatment of common childhood infections • ARI/Diarrhoea control, Integrated Management of Childhood Illness • Little evidence of progress Objectives • To undertake a systematic quantitative review of studies published between 1990 and 2009 about medicine use in children < 5 years in primary care in developing and transitional countries in order to assess progress and the impact of interventions undertaken to improve use
Methods • Database (MS Access) created of studies on use of medicines in primary care in developing and transitional countries • All studies published during 1990 – 2009 reporting quantitative data eligible for inclusion • This study uses a subset of studies in children <5 years • Data on commonly used medicine use indicators measured in these studies plus details of study setting and methodology extracted from the reports/articles & entered into the database • Studies identified from INRUD bibliography, PubMed, WHO archives (EMP, CAH), MSH archives • As far as possible, extracted data from one study was entered as one database record • All data-entry checked by 2 persons (KAH, VI) • Analysis done using excel • To estimate trends and patterns of use, medians of medicine use indicators (limited to baseline data for intervention studies)estimated by study year, region, facility ownership, and prescriber type were calculated
Results • 394 surveys conducted in 78 countries – identified • 82% surveys included > 2 health facilities &/or > 599 patient encounters • Facility type • % surveys done in the public sector 74.5%, private-for-profit sector 25% and private not-for-profit sector 0.5% • % of surveys done in pharmacy shops 13%, non-licensed shops 3%, households 7%, hospitals 7%, PHC 41%, hospitals+PHC 29% • Prescriber type • % surveys examining prescribing by doctors 26%, nurses or paramedics 56%, CHW 10%, pharmacist/assts 3%, layperson 5% • Disease type • % surveys examining treatment of diarrhoea 60%, ARI 58% , malaria 32%
Public vs Private treatment of childhood infectionsdoctors, nurses & paramedics only
Intervention impact • 226 surveys were associated with an intervention to improve medicines use • 45 interventions were adequately evaluated, using RCT, pre-post with control or time series study design • Effect size of interventions • Pre-post change (intervention group) – pre-post change (control) calculated for each outcome measured in each study • 2 measures of effect for each intervention study: • largest % change in any outcome measured • median % change across all outcomes measured • Median of the above 2 measures calculated across all studies by intervention type
Intervention impact: largest % change in any medicines use outcome measured in each study
Intervention impact: median % change over all medicines use outcomes measured in each study (av.4/study)
Conclusions • Key Lessons Learnt • Treatment of childhood infections remains poor in all regions over the past 25 years and is worse in the private compared to the public sector • Effective interventions are those with multiple components e.g. provider & consumer education with supervision, community case management, IMCI • Medicines use database can be used to monitor treatment of childhood infections in developing & transitional countries, where there is little data and methodological limitations • Policy implications • Implement more multi-faceted interventions to improve treatment of childhood infections & evaluate the impact using adequate study design • Future research agenda • Identify how to build effective interventions & monitoring into the health care systems in a sustainable way • How to expand/maintain the drug use database and put it in the public domain (requires funds)